Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Subject: Chertoff, Kyl, and amnesty
National Review's The Corner ^ | 6/13/07 | Anonymous e-mailer

Posted on 06/13/2007 11:50:20 AM PDT by jhs80

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: politeia

As I watch this, my own concern is that Americans themselves have lost belief and confidence in self government. For instance, I wonder why it is that there is any need for Minutemen, anymore. Having been shown how, why is it that residents of the border states don’t enforce their own borders without them? Alll they do is whine about the feds.


61 posted on 06/14/2007 4:44:28 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Buenos Dias from Mexico. GOOD POINT. The infrastructure and sharing information in Mexico really is behind, and it would ALL so difficult to do background checks, especially if they are using an alias or fraudulent name and stealing I.D. BOY...do I know this happens...
Juan Pena married Maria Jesus only to find out he was really Enrique and was wanted for violent crimes in Queretaro. Just go down and tell people your momma and daddy never registered you, pick a name and date and start all over. Use those legal documents you get at the BANK and Bingo.
NYET...no background records are on computerized on line like in the ole USA.
Send em all back, we need them here and they’ll bring money, it would be good for the Dad’s to be back home with their teen age boys. THIS is the slant MSM and even FR has missed. The impact on nuclear families of kids growing up with no male figure..just grandma and a single love starved mom.
Don’t send them back with AIDS, as this has happened SO MANY times we have Indigenous villages now infected wth AIDS and no one has medical facilities to know how it is diagnosed or treated.
Send em home. Do us all a favor. Adios


62 posted on 06/14/2007 4:47:54 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Too many sweeping generalizations for me. What is your responsibility to comply with the law?


63 posted on 06/14/2007 4:51:42 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gonzo

How about these?

Texas Employers for Immigration Reform (TEIR) represents a broad base of Texas businesses, including farmers, hotels, restaurants, banks, manufacturers, retailers, and associations. Join today and add your organizations name to this growing list of supporters.

http://txeir.org/supporters.aspx


64 posted on 06/14/2007 4:58:02 AM PDT by Master of Orion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
Yes, one does become pessimistic about citizens' interest in preserving self-government. Ultimately we do get the government we deserve. But after reading Downsizing Democracy: How America Sidelines its Citizens and Privatized its Public by Crenson and Ginsberg I changed my attitude about how much "we the people" should be blamed for this state of affairs.

This book documents how almost every policy enacted by the federal government in the past 70 years, from income tax withholding to legislating by the judiciary, welfare programs and Presidential executive orders and war powers, has acted to marginalize citizens and make it harder for citizens to mass together to influence Congress in the way necessary for republican self-government. We have been bribed to give up our role as citizens with welfare programs (bread and circuses) and when that doesn't work the courts or the executive steps in impose an elite policy against the will of the people.

We have been trained by a paternalistic welfare state to think of ourselves as "customers" not citizens and we have been effectively neutered in terms of our ability to influence public policy. The illegal immigration issue highlights this disconnect more clearly than any other. We have had an open borders policy imposed on us against our will for 40 years that we have never voted for and in direct defiance of our democratically enacted laws against illegal immigration. When the elites can't bribe us or control us in any other way, they simply refuse to enforce the policies we have put into law through Congress. They don't believe we have any right to have any say over any public polices that conflict with their elite agenda.

Recovering self-government will take re-educating an entire generation of Americans to value the liberty to govern ourselves over the benefits of social security, Medicare, Medicaid and other federal income transfer programs. It will also take starting a political movement that believes in the principles of republican self-government that will challenge both political parties for the allegiance of citizens.

Call me naive, but I do believe that there remains an instinct for liberty and self-government especially among Americans old enough to have been educated under the old regime when citizens were still respected as citizens and not demoted to customers. I have enough confidence in the ancient American faith of liberty and popular self-government to believe that the majority of Americans would respond to a political movement that properly explains what is at stake. What we lack is the leadership. Where is our current champion of self-government, the modern day equivalent of Thomas Jefferson?

65 posted on 06/14/2007 5:29:56 AM PDT by politeia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

‘I agree with you. Very few businesses can actually use these people, and big corps don’t think it is worth the risk, as they have deep pockets. Most of these people are off the books self-employed.’

Yep.


66 posted on 06/14/2007 5:56:20 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

‘While I think you have a reasonable point about making sure that ones claims are backed up, there certainly are at least some businesses (particularly in agriculture) that want this.”

No disputing that ‘some’ do, but its not the epidemic the media and some politicians are claiming.


67 posted on 06/14/2007 5:57:10 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: okie01

‘I’m not buying the ‘business wants this’ argument for the simply reason I’ve never read of a single business that supports it.
Tyson, for one. ‘

Combining every corporate entity thats been shown to be using illegals routinely, its a microscopic percentage of the whole.

That contradicts the MSM and the politicians.


68 posted on 06/14/2007 5:58:30 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

Which law? Privacy act? EEO act? Immigration laws? Bureaucratic regs? I have no sympathy for these companies, but this is being driven by the customers.


69 posted on 06/14/2007 5:59:13 AM PDT by steve8714 ("A man needs a maid", my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gonzo

‘Same gig, and I’m not buyin’ it either, Badeye. It’s a bogus argument, but it leaves the question - why-in-hell is Bush pushing so hard?’

I have no idea why the President is pushing this thing so hard, given the obvious flaws, and the general publics distrust of the Federal Govenrment to enforce the laws or secure the border. Bush’s second term has been a HUGE disappointment to me.

Freepmail .................... FRegards

Got it and responded.


70 posted on 06/14/2007 6:00:00 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Yep, there are a few, a relative few.

But its not the gigantic ‘problem’ some make it out to be.


71 posted on 06/14/2007 6:01:56 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

I live in a lawn service neighborhood. I’m one of the very few residents who actually own and use a lawnmower. Everyone else pays someone else to do it. I have noted that, this year, most of the crews on the trucks are Mexicans, often times including the boss/driver.
As an aside, I believe that LaRaza and the “caliphate” have a lot in common as regards the US and it ain’t good.

No disputing what you say here. Its just not the problem some pretend it is, for whatever reason.

And you might have a point about La Raza.


72 posted on 06/14/2007 6:02:48 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jhs80

I am SO disappointed in Kyl!!! Sen. Kyl....NEVER co-sign a bill with a KENNEDY....NEVER!!!


73 posted on 06/14/2007 6:22:33 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy (Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

You will be looking for work, soon. Or, in jail. Watch out. Your use of the term professional is not any I recognize.


74 posted on 06/14/2007 6:28:18 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: politeia

Certainly a move to increase the power of the federal government has been central to Democrat ideas. The chief means has been the witholding of income taxes. The second has been the network news which focuses attention on NYC and Washington seeking to defy the “all politics is local” truism With all eyes on DC and its big pot of money, local government goes on mostly unobserved. I think pressure group politics is a shadow government we neither elect or control.


75 posted on 06/14/2007 6:36:03 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jhs80
QUISLING: a synonym for traitor, someone who collaborates with the invaders of his country.
76 posted on 06/14/2007 6:40:41 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

I neither sanctioned this nor do I participate in it. I merely report what I saw. You make too many assumptions.
Illegals are a pain in the ass, but employers want them because they get the same output every day of the week, every week of the year. Yankee workers call in sick on Monday and Friday, have their P.O. appointments during work hours, and like to organize unions or file for workers compensation. Illegals don’t. The wage rates tend to be the same, but actual labor costs differ.


77 posted on 06/14/2007 7:12:31 AM PDT by steve8714 ("A man needs a maid", my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: politeia
Benjamin Franklin warned us that it would be up to us to keep our republican form of government. The question is are "we the people" up to the task?

This question haunts me. Too many of us have not been vigilant enough in defending that which makes America the greatest country on earth. We take our blessings for granted and complain feebly when our legislators let us down.

I know many people who agree with me about immigration. I am among the distinct minority of those who have bothered to donate to organizations who share my view, or who have contacted politicians. Those of us who care have to increase our efforts, and we cannot rest even if by some miracle this bill dies.

78 posted on 06/14/2007 7:52:38 AM PDT by jhs80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

What is not a “gigantic problem?” The number of illegals? The number of businesses who want amnesty?

I think you are WAY off on this, either way. Every major meat and poultry producer/processor in the US employs illegals and are directly supporting amnesty. Many agriculture businesses employ illegals, and want amnesty. The farmers around here talk a big game about the legal status of their Hispanic employees... but in reality, the proposed amnesty helps them out greatly.


79 posted on 06/14/2007 7:59:15 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mikeus_maximus
Chertoff's response is incredibly ominous. He wants to disable local efforts to defend the public against the depradations of illegal aliens, both those he intends to give amnesty as well as those he is now allowing to slip into the country.

Probably means he was bought off by Saddam Hussein's billions, or maybe even directly by Osama Bin Laden.

We really can't tolerate this guy in a position of authority in this country any longer.

80 posted on 06/14/2007 8:12:14 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson