Whatta joke!
1. this columnist must not know very much about Bob Dole
2. The War on Terror is (in my opinion) what most people will have in their minds when the go into the voting booth for President...and I agree that Giuliani has the others beat on this...most certainly the Democratic candidates.
The taunt did not impress the on duty Mod.
In before the “Oh no, not this stuff again” photo.
This is a no-brainer. You can’t invoke 9-11 forever. It’s like Chris Rock once opined, why is this guy a superhero for doing his job, going on television calming people down, assessing the damage and getting out there so that his city could see he gave a flip.
lib paper lovin’ on a fellow lib.
LLS
Translation, Rudy is a Republican Hillary Clinton on the other issues so is acceptable to the Dinosaur media.
How many wives does Romney have again?
And I wonder why the esteemed journalist failed to point out that Rudy's "religious group" stresses marriage for life (no divorce), yet he's been married thrice. I'm not jumping on Rudy for that, just pointing out intellectual dishonesty of the Boston Herald as I see it.
By the way - it's kind of funny he pointed out that Obama has never won outside of Illinois and then didn't mention that Giuliani has never won outside of New York CITY. Guess it doesn't take much talent to write for a newspaper - you just have to throw a few sentences together and parrot the talking points.
Propaganda. I spit on this hack.
Bologna.
Life is the most important right of every age, and Rudy vaguely gets it.
Otherwise, he wouldn’t be trumpeting this nonsense about this war being the defining issue...blah, blah, blah.
It’s important because they want to take our LIFE. Without it, of course, we’re dead. :>) Dead men don’t tell tells...nor vote, nor buy homes, nor contribute to society...
Why is blowing up the WTC different than killing 40 million babies since Roe?
“Is he pro-choice? Is he pro-gay? Who cares?”
Idiot. Rudy’s nomination would destroy the GOP.
It would be a lose/lose for conservatives on Nov 2008.
Consider immigration:
“I believe the anti-immigration movement in America is one of our most serious public problems.” — Rudy Giuliani, Oct. 10, 1996.
http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/05/23/rudy-the-mayor-of-sanctuary-city/
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002011.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1782954/posts
http://lonewacko.com/blog/archives/005877.html
Guliani supported the Bush position on immigration. Guliani will be more liberal on immigration than Romney and Thompson and certainly the real hawks like Hunter and tancredo.
HOW CAN RUDY BE GOOD FOR NATIONAL SECURITY WHEN HE’S WEAK ON ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAW IN THE CITIES?
The War On Terror? What’s that got to do with Paris Hilton?
I dont see why this has a barf alert....odds are Rudy is going to win the nomination
Giuliani is one of the weakest GOP candidates on Islamofascism. His “solution” is to take us back to 90s police tactics. His three talking points are PATRIOT Act, surveillance, interrogation. He can redefine these as “being on the offense” all he likes, but the reality is that these are defensive tactics primarily designed to fight terrorism here, rather than overseas.
Of course, he doesn’t have a clue about how to fight overseas, because he has absolutely zero foreign policy experience. Here’s Mark Steyn on Giuliani and the GWOT: “The one I find actually rather disappointing is Giuliani . . . when you listen to him speak, what worries me is that he has a sort of airport security approach to the war. And he’s not actually very good when he’s talking about the big foreign policy aspects of it and the big geopolitical thing. He’s very good if you want to hunker down and have a security checkpoint. He’s the guy who’d be good for manning that checkpoint.”