Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Gates to Announce Gen. Pace Resignation at 1pm. News Conf.
Fox News | 06/08/2007

Posted on 06/08/2007 9:59:50 AM PDT by tsmith130

Foxs News Alert...that's all so far.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dod; jointchiefs; peterpace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-211 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
"If this were remotely true then that would mean: A) that the Bush administration won't support it's people, and B) anyone who takes the job does so knowing that they can expect zero support from the White House. "

I could mean lots of things. One is that Pace didn’t want to go through the BS with or without Bush’s support. He may have big reservations about treating the Iraq war as a civil rather than a regional war and just said, “F this, I’m trained to win wars, not political compromises”.

81 posted on 06/08/2007 10:38:48 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Subject to paragraph (3), an officer serving as Chairman may be reappointed in the same manner for two additional terms. However, in time of war there is no limit on the number of re appointments.


82 posted on 06/08/2007 10:39:40 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: therut

Ya so true, and will never get by our so PC senate..
really sucks


83 posted on 06/08/2007 10:39:42 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

See my link in #80.


84 posted on 06/08/2007 10:39:50 AM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Hmm.. Thompson/Pace? Just sayin’....


85 posted on 06/08/2007 10:40:15 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Friend of Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

I did not understand what you posted AC, can you please explain again? Thank you.


86 posted on 06/08/2007 10:40:52 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

because of Iraq.. ap lays it on heavy here in this excerpt

Washington can never have enough scapegoats on hand.

Mullen tabbed to head Chiefs of Staff ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1847108/posts?page=13#13

Gates said that Mullen has the “vision strategic insight and integrity to lead America’s armed forces.”

At the same time, he conceded he wished “it were not necessary to make a decision like this.”

As chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for two years, and vice chairman for the previous four, Pace has been involved in all of the key decisions leading to the invasion of Iraq, and the planning for the post- Saddam Hussein era.

The war, now in its fifth year, has claimed the lives of more than 3,500 U.S. troops, and has become intensely unpopular with the public.


87 posted on 06/08/2007 10:41:51 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... For want of a few good men, a once great nation was lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Most Chairmen serve two 2-year terms, for a total of four years, but they have to be renominated and get confirmed in the Senate at the end of the first term before starting the second. That’s what’s going on here with Pace. He and the Vice Chair would have had to go through the Levin-McCain meat grinder before starting his second term, IF he somehow managed to get re-confirmed by the ‘Rat controlled Senate.


88 posted on 06/08/2007 10:42:34 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

“I concluded that because Gen. Pace has served as chairman and vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the last six years, the focus of his confirmation process would have been on the past rather than the future,” Gates said.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19112660/

It’s Iraq.


89 posted on 06/08/2007 10:42:45 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
>Pace will write a tell all book and slam the Administration for the way it handled the war

Maybe. Remember
Admiral Boorda? He wrote
only a short note...

90 posted on 06/08/2007 10:42:58 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Why General Petreaus?

Who are Conway and Mattis?

91 posted on 06/08/2007 10:45:07 AM PDT by Kaslin (Fred Thompson for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: All
Admiral Mike Mullen

A native of Los Angeles, Admiral Mike Mullen graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1968.

He commanded three ships: the gasoline tanker USS Noxubee (AOG 56), the guided missile destroyer USS Goldsborough (DDG 20), and the guided missile cruiser USS Yorktown (CG 48).

As a Flag Officer, Adm. Mullen commanded Cruiser-Destroyer Group 2, the George Washington Battle Group, and the U.S. 2nd Fleet/NATO Striking Fleet Atlantic.

Ashore he has served in leadership positions at the Naval Academy, in the Navy's Bureau of Personnel, in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and on the Navy Staff. He was the 32nd Vice Chief of Naval Operations from August 2003 to October 2004.

His last operational assignment was as Commander, NATO Joint Force Command Naples/Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe.

Adm. Mullen is a graduate of the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School and earned a Master of Science degree in Operations Research from the Naval Postgraduate School.

He became the 28th Chief of Naval Operations in July 2005.

For a longer version of this biography, please click here.

92 posted on 06/08/2007 10:47:17 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Lieutenant General James T. Conway, USMC

Lieutenant General James Mattis, USMC

93 posted on 06/08/2007 10:47:45 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

When I say “He is too good for us,” I don’t mean he thinks he is too good for us. I mean that he is too good for our immorality loving Nation. Not too many people want someone to remind them of truth and morality anymore.


94 posted on 06/08/2007 10:48:42 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: tsmith130
Yet another after effect of our "teach 'em a lesson" stay at home Republicans!

This in NOT George Bush's fault but THEIRS!!

While I would PREFER a FIGHT rather than capitulation, IMHO it may not be wise during an ongoing WAR.

96 posted on 06/08/2007 10:52:59 AM PDT by PISANO (There is NO security & there can be none as long as there are suicide bombers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brityank

Thanks, brit.


97 posted on 06/08/2007 10:53:33 AM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Democrat senators have been publicly attacking Pace for some time for his remarks about homosexuals in the military—which only happen to be supporting the official policy agreed to by clinton, “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

It’s obvious that the Democrats leaned on Bush to get rid of Pace, and Bush agreed.

And I’m sorry to say that it’s not surprising. Bush has a history of standing up for a few of his PERSONAL friends—Miers and Gonzalez, for instance. But he also has a history of not standing up for loyal servants of his administration and this country. The list is a long one. Scooter Libby comes to mind, and the border agents who tried to stop a drug smuggler, and the marines at Haditha, and on and on.

Bush bends over backwards to be nice to the likes of kennedy and clinton, but he won’t lift a finger to help his loyal supporters. I’m sorry, because he doesn’t seem like that kind of guy when you watch him, but he just keeps doing it.

Pace is being punished for speaking out frankly on what is official policy—that homosexuals are not permitted to flaunt their sexual relations in public while they are serving in the military. He also mentioned that public adultery is not permitted, but no one noticed it.


98 posted on 06/08/2007 10:56:10 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Pace Faces Tough Questions From Young Citizens

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, Hawaii, June 6, 2007 – Marine Gen. Peter Pace has faced tough questions from the president, the National Security Council and members of Congress. The toughest questions, however, seem to come from the nation’s youngest citizens.

During a town hall meeting here yesterday, for example, 8-year-old Katherina Daul asked the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Why do soldiers have to deploy so long?”

Pace came here specifically to meet with family members whose loved ones are among the first to be extended under the Army’s new policy. He was on his way back to the United States from a trip to Singapore and Malaysia.

Katherina came out to the base theater to see the chairman with her mom, Carol, and her 13-year-old brother Jeremiah.

Katherina’s dad — Army Capt. Kevin Daul, a chaplain assigned to the 45th Special Troops Battalion, 45th Sustainment Brigade — is due to return to Schofield at the end of this month or beginning of July. He’s been deployed in Iraq for 11 months. His unit was not affected by the extension.

“It hasn’t been easy going thru even a 12-month separation,” Carol said. “I don’t fear for his safety, it’s just hard be apart for so long,”

Schofield Barracks is the family’s first duty station and it’s the first deployment they’ve gone through, she said.

“We’ve been married for 15 years this August and we’ve never been separated for so long,” she said. The children have taken it fairly well, she said, but “sometimes there have been some emotional upsets that I know are because their Daddy is gone.”

After listening to about 45 minutes of questions and answers by the grown ups in the theater, Jeremiah raised his hand to ask Pace a question.

In a gentlemanly fashion, he thanked the chairman for meeting with them and offered a suggestion. Jeremiah said that along with rest and recuperation back home, the Army should send soldiers from Iraq for R&R at military resorts in Germany and then send the families to join them.

“That’s a great idea,” Pace said. “It would be a great way to show that we value the families. I’ll look into that.”

Pace also reassured Jeremiah that he is doing everything he can to make sure that military parents have more time to spend with their children.

After a few more questions by the grownups, Pace turned to a tiny hand in the air. “Are you trying to upstage your brother?” he teased Katherina.

The youngster took the microphone and slowly and clearly asked, “Why do soldiers have to deploy so long?”

Pace’s answer seemed to resonate with the audience as a reminder of why they were all there in the first place.

“Soldiers have to deploy so long sometimes, because soldiers love their daughters,” the chairman replied, drawing applause.

“And as much as your Daddy would prefer to be here right now hugging you, he wants to make sure that you get to grow up in the same United States that he got to grow up in,” Pace said.

“There are bad people out there who want to change that. Your Daddy is going to make sure that they don’t,” he said.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=46314

He will be missed.


99 posted on 06/08/2007 10:58:15 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

That did not happen. You’re making things up.


100 posted on 06/08/2007 10:58:45 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson