Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/07/2007 11:24:56 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

grey goo?


2 posted on 06/07/2007 11:28:09 PM PDT by Eyes Unclouded (We won't ever free our guns but be sure we'll let them triggers go....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

This could be the real “Ice-9” of Vonnegut’s novel, Cat’s Cradle


3 posted on 06/07/2007 11:29:49 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
"Craig Venter, an American who cracked the human genome in 2000,"

He was the president and founder of Celera Genomics, which was very successful. Let's not be so dramatic.

4 posted on 06/07/2007 11:31:05 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Sounds like a good novel.


5 posted on 06/07/2007 11:31:44 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (DUNCAN HUNTER for President - http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Now I;m no biologist but wouldn’t there be a risk in engineering a synthetic life form and introducing it to the environment? How can they control it? What if it mutates into something harmful?


6 posted on 06/07/2007 11:32:04 PM PDT by rbosque (MSM = Miserable Socialist Morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Yesterday, an ETC spokesman, Jim Thomas, called on the world's patent offices to reject the applications.

He said: "These monopoly claims signal the start of a high-stakes commercial race to synthesise and privatise synthetic life forms. Will Venter's company become the 'Microbesoft' of synthetic biology?" A colleague, Pat Mooney, said: "For the first time, God has competition. Venter and his colleagues have breached a societal boundary, and the public hasn't even had a chance to debate the far-reaching social, ethical and environmental implications of synthetic life."

So what if ETC had done it?
8 posted on 06/07/2007 11:34:50 PM PDT by IslandJeff ("I used to care, but things have changed" - Robert Zimmerman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

The concept of putting specialized DNA into bacteria or other cells (often, by means of viruses) in order to get certain properties or capabilities isn’t new. He could patent his method for getting his particular modified germ, and patent that germ much as a nursery patents its fruit or vegetable plants, but couldn’t prevent others from creating modified germs by other methods.


9 posted on 06/07/2007 11:34:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Two items:

a.) God has NO competition, but Pat Mooney has an overactive hyperbole gland.

b.) A custom-designed microbe that eats liberals while producing biofuel suitable for motor vehicles would be a true “win win” product.


10 posted on 06/07/2007 11:35:05 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

I’m always in favor of competition. If God can’t compete, He’s got only Himself to blame.


13 posted on 06/07/2007 11:41:15 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
PLEASE, make sure you can kill it before you make it!

If the headline makes you hopeful, why am I so frightened? I've seen "mankind" in action before. How about that Kudzu? Wonderful, eh?

19 posted on 06/07/2007 11:55:41 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

If they can make ethanol, perhaps they can make crude oil, instead.

Otherwise we wind up with a lot of idle refinery capacity and unemployed refinery and oil industry workers.

Plus we wouldn’t need to modify our vehicles. And finally we could flood the world with our synthetic crude oil, drive the price down, and harm our mortal mideast enemies.


26 posted on 06/08/2007 12:07:27 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

“It is part of an effort to create designer bugs to manufacture hydrogen and biofuels, as well as absorb carbon dioxide and other harmful greenhouse gases.”

Hmmm. A bug that destroys or “eats” water vapor.


37 posted on 06/08/2007 12:33:35 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Any synthetic life form will not mutate to survive outside the controlled conditions in the lab. I am looking with great skepticism at this so called synthetic microbe, and I bet the concept will not be reality for at least 10 years. The Arabs are safe for now!


43 posted on 06/08/2007 1:12:09 AM PDT by autosellers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Man-made microbe 'to create endless biofuel' ["God has competition."]

God : Competition? Huh. OK, let's have a "competition"...Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Just funnin'... : )

45 posted on 06/08/2007 1:37:05 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Patents? You mean he plans to make money on a fuel source? Shameful.


46 posted on 06/08/2007 1:38:42 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Turns out it rapidly multiplies in the gut and then turns the animal into a hydrogen as well as methane puffing machine. And how big would those flames be?

And why not also see if Airwick wanted to make designer E. coli by incorporating genes for making various types of essential oils so that one could have rose or peppermint farts?
48 posted on 06/08/2007 2:16:27 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Hey, we’ve got to let humans do jobs that God Himself won’t do.

But seriously, folks, one can’t patent something that has not been “reduced to practice.” That means that you cannot just patent a cool idea. You have to make it work.


49 posted on 06/08/2007 4:22:14 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

IMO, a patent should not be issued until they show a working model.


50 posted on 06/08/2007 4:26:27 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson