Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration Bill Fails Crucial Test Vote (It's dead for now Jim)
ny way news (AP) ^ | 6/7/2007 | JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

Posted on 06/07/2007 6:42:49 PM PDT by UB355

Immigration Bill Fails Crucial Test Vote Email this Story

Jun 7, 9:24 PM (ET)

US Immigration Documents - View Original Source Historical Docs. Register with Footnote Today. Footnote.com

WASHINGTON (AP) - A broad immigration bill to legalize millions of people in the U.S. unlawfully failed a crucial test vote in the Senate Thursday, a stunning setback that could spell its defeat for the year.

The vote was 45-50 against limiting debate on the bill, 15 short of the 60 that the bill's supporters needed to prevail. Most Republicans voted to block Democrats' efforts to bring the bill to a final vote.

The legislation, which had been endorsed by President Bush, would tighten borders, institute a new system to prevent employers from hiring undocumented workers in addition to giving up to 12 million illegal immigrants a pathway to legal status.

Conceived by an improbable coalition that nicknamed the deal a "grand bargain," the measure exposed deep rifts within both parties and is loathed by most GOP conservatives.

Senate Majority Harry Reid, D-Nev., who had made no secret of his distaste for parts of the bill, said earlier he would move on to other matters if the immigration measure's supporters didn't get 60 votes Thursday night.

The defeat set off a bitter round of partisan recriminations, with Democrats and Republicans each accusing the other of killing it.

Most Republicans voted against ending debate, saying they needed more time to make the bill tougher with tighter border security measures and a more arduous legalization process for unlawful immigrants.

All but a handful of Democrats supported the move, but they, too, were holding their noses at provisions of the bill. Many of them argued it makes second-class citizens of a new crop of temporary workers and rips apart families by prioritizing employability over blood ties in future immigration.

Still, they had argued that the measure, on balance, was worth advancing.

"We can all find different aspects of this legislation that we differ with," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, the leading Democratic architect of the bill.

Reid, who had made no secret of his distaste for parts of the bill, quickly pulled it from the floor and moved on to other business, costing the measure perhaps its best chance at enactment.

He insisted that the immigration bill is not dead for the year. "I, even though disappointed, look forward to passing this bill," Reid said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigration; reid; s1348
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2007 6:42:50 PM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UB355


2 posted on 06/07/2007 6:44:25 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Fred in '08. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Well I guess we can count on some more illegal immigrant street theatre in coming days.


3 posted on 06/07/2007 6:44:46 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

He insisted that the immigration bill is not dead for the year.


4 posted on 06/07/2007 6:44:58 PM PDT by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., second from left, speaks about immigration reform during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 7, 2007. From left are, Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., obscured, Specter, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)


5 posted on 06/07/2007 6:45:40 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... For want of a few good men, a once great nation was lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

On to step 2: Getting rid of every republican senotor that supported this complete POS.


6 posted on 06/07/2007 6:46:34 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

The roll call vote is now posted.

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00206


7 posted on 06/07/2007 6:46:54 PM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks (Demands, marches and media sob stories diminish my compassion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Try search much?


8 posted on 06/07/2007 6:47:04 PM PDT by xcamel ("It's Thompson Time!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Ha,ha,friggin Graham’s crying !!!


9 posted on 06/07/2007 6:47:51 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

I thought I Heard him say (on the radio, from the senate floor) that it would not be brought back next session or next year.


10 posted on 06/07/2007 6:48:43 PM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
It's DEAD, Juan!!!!


11 posted on 06/07/2007 6:49:30 PM PDT by Viking2002 (Fred in '08. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Great. Now we need to kill HR 1022 (AWB renewal) and then simply use the solution on ILLEGAL (the fact I feel the need to emphasis that word represents a large part of the problem) immigration everyone but the politicians want: Enforce the EXISTING Laws.

However, doing the right thing and enforcing the existing laws will NOT lead to the following. This may be what is really irking the politicians:
1. Expansion of government agencies
2. Expansion of government unions
3. Cries for yet MORE agencies to assist and study the new agencies.
4. Demands for more agencies and “blue ribbon panels’ to study the agencies that are studying the agencies.

I’d go on, but the Monty Python reference would be overdone.


12 posted on 06/07/2007 6:50:58 PM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Once this bill is behind us (and hopefully it will be) somebody needs to inform the President that the republican website http://www.gop.com has not seen much of an update since before the 2006 election. There are even Bush vs Kerry videos being featured still.

Has the GOP replaced Melhman(sp) yet?

Something needs to change soon!


13 posted on 06/07/2007 6:52:50 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

I just want to Thank the American People for putting the heat on these Congressman and Senators to kill this bill.

Now we have to make sure they are forced to enforce the immigration laws we have on the books Now and to deport people that are here illegally.

Let’s keep our on on these politicians to make sure they don’t slip it by us.


14 posted on 06/07/2007 6:53:07 PM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355
Teddy Kennedy Republicans:
Graham, Hagel, Lugar, Martinez, McCain, Specter, Voinovich
15 posted on 06/07/2007 6:53:15 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UB355

What this means to me is that there still could be more pork added to this bill to persuade more Dims or RINOs to vote for it. Question is, how much more are the Dims willing to steal from the American people for the sake of another huge class of victims or how far are the Dims willing to go to embarass President Bush?


16 posted on 06/07/2007 6:53:40 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
On to step 2: Getting rid of every republican senotor that supported this complete POS.

Nice of you to give the Democrat Senators who supported it a pass.
17 posted on 06/07/2007 6:54:53 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

Thanks you Sue Collins and Olympia Snowe!


18 posted on 06/07/2007 6:55:22 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UB355

Chalk this up to lots of PO’d voters. I hope that those that supported this travesty don’t think that the bill’s failure will get them off the hook.


19 posted on 06/07/2007 6:56:07 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

O.K., I see Reid voted yes for cloture. I saw earlier today that the only way a cloture vote can be rebrought back up is if Reid voted on a losing roll call. If that is true, is this really really dead and if not how does it get back to the floor or does it start all over again? Anyone know that answer?


20 posted on 06/07/2007 6:56:11 PM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson