1 posted on
06/04/2007 7:31:28 AM PDT by
tang0r
To: tang0r
Maybe that’s the way it was intended, but that’s not the way it works.
2 posted on
06/04/2007 7:42:25 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: tang0r
Progressives like George Lakoff, I believe, retain a shred of legitimacy only because their benighted economic policies have no chance of being implemented, and thus they can't be proven wrong. Boy, now theres your classic example of: pot, kettle, black.
To: tang0r
With Click-it-or-Ticket and No Child Left Behind, how long does local government have? And this is with a so-called Republican president.
4 posted on
06/04/2007 8:11:46 AM PDT by
jackieaxe
(This one hour pre-flight security screening is brought to you by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)
To: tang0r; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...

Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
5 posted on
06/04/2007 8:12:17 AM PDT by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: tang0r
I don’t know about this outfit in general, but this piece has trouble right out of the chute. That 7th word in the title leaves me just a bit chapped every time I hear it misused as a description our our system of government.
And then the idea, that we would benefit from a patchwork of local economic systems and varying degrees and kinds of infringements of individual rights from one town to the next, is simply absurd.
7 posted on
06/04/2007 8:55:09 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson