Posted on 06/03/2007 1:34:03 PM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem
Excerpt:
"The Democratic debate will air live on CNN at 7 p.m. ET tonight."
"All the candidates -- except Hillary Clinton -- have to try to shake up this race," he said. "They need to say something that gets Democrats to look at them fresh and say, 'Well now isn't that interesting? I didn't know that about this candidate.'
(Read - They're going to try to out-kook each other.)
Fire up the popcorn!
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Hmmm.. Which rat will promise that he/she can turn America into a weak, appeasing, Euro-socialist welfare state the fastest? The suspense is killing me.
.. REUTERS/Joshua Lott ..
Given yesterday’s headlines about the plot to blow up fuel lines at JFK, it should be interesting to ask John Edwards and his half of the Dem field that doesn’t believe the War on Terror exists whether they still believe that or not.
Possible typo? Maybe they mean 8 instead of 18. If there are 18 that'd be something to see!
You forgot about Global Warming. They will all present legislation to "reduce greenhouse gases." BTW, Did they stop trying to save social security?
Hillary bending over...thank God it’s just a cartoon.
I wonder if the Gerth/Van Natta book will come up. Hillary listened to illegally recorded conversations of perceived political enemies. She hired the infamous Anthony Pellicano to go after the women who had a story to tell. Will anyone dare ask her about that illegal activity?
“Will anyone dare ask her about that illegal activity?”
Is the Pope a Calvinist? :)
Universal, common good, Bush Tax Cuts, ...
I can just see it now: “A question to all of the Democratic candidates: Exactly how “evil” is the Bush administration?” Also, people, who will be asking the questions, will be pleading with the Democratic contenders to try to find out who will help them with their problems the most? “Besides talking about the ongoing War in Iraq, what will you also do to help successfully reverse man made global warming?”-It’s not a problem because it’s just a 100% sham made up by the politicians in order to make many people feel bad while the government also raises everyone’s taxes even more while also creating even more regulations and even more “red tape” at every level of government, you ignorant dope! And the mainstream media just lets it all slide because they won’t heavily criticise the Democrats. The ongoing and never ending mainstream media political bias drives me bonkers!
Anyone have suggestions for “drinking words?”
Bush
civil war
moral
middle class
George Allen was politically destroyed by one word — macaca. He profusely apologized. Hillary absolutely called Paul Fray an “f-ing Jew b*st*rd.”. She got away with it virtually unchallenged.
That would be the first 'Rat that opens its mouth.
Questions for:
Sen. Hillary Clinton:
— Were you at the caucus meeting where former Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., suggested that all Democratic senators read the full classified National Intelligence Estimate? Why didn’t you read it?
— If you were briefed on the classified intelligence, how can we trust you to make the right decision in the future with all the facts in front of you? And if you didn’t read the classified intelligence, how can we trust you to get all the facts in front of you?
— You’ve often talked about the importance of unions, but when you were on the board of Wal-Mart, you reportedly were silent while Wal-Mart actively and publicly opposed union organizing. How do you explain this contradiction?
— The Washington Post said that “[your] loyalists describe [you] as the least-known famous person in politics, by which they mean they do not believe people know the real Hillary Clinton. They hope to use town hall meetings, living room coffees and interactive Internet conversations to reintroduce her to voters.” However, you’ve hired an expert in “thought leadership,” and a corporate branding expert to confront potential “character issues.” Why did your campaign hire these consultants? What have you learned from them?
Former Sen. John Edwards:
— You had access to classified information, including the National Intelligence Estimate, during the days before the vote to go to war in Iraq. However, your campaign recently admitted that you did not read the NIE, one of the only documents that provided key caveats to the Bush administration’s justification for war. Why not? And do you wish that you had?
— You’ve now been running for president as long as you were in the Senate. Should Americans trust that you have the experience to be commander in chief?
— Over the past four years, you have collected approximately $580,000 in salary from three jobs—Fortress Investments, your poverty center and the Senate—where you often didn’t show up for work. You talk a lot about the importance of hard work and the work ethic your father instilled in you. Was it right for you to get paid so much for what amounted to very little work? Isn’t that the kind of inequality your campaign is fighting against?
— You’ve railed against offshore tax shelters but you’ve still got money in the Caymans through your investments in Fortress hedge fund. Will you divest yourself of those holdings?
Sen. Barack Obama:
— You rose to prominence as an anti-war candidate who opposed funding the operation in Iraq in your 2004 Senate primary race. But when you got to the Senate, you went underground, failing to speak out on the war for the first 18 or so months in office and voting to fund the war. Why did you wait until you became a presidential candidate to speak out about the war? Are you pandering to the left?
— Do you honestly think you can convince voters that there’s something new, different, better in the way you do politics when, since entering the Senate, you chose to conduct a real estate deal with a known—now indicted—Chicago criminal?
— You’ve promised universal health care but failed to include the one thing in your plan that experts across the board think is needed to ensure coverage for all—a coverage mandate. Isn’t it misleading to promise universal health care when leading academics have concluded that a mandate is needed to cover everyone?
— Your website says “We need to take steps to stop climate change.” If you believe this, why do you support liquid coal technology, which would worsen global warming?
For Gov. Bill Richardson:
— You’ve based your campaign on your resume. But recently, many aspects of your resume have been called into question—from the trivial, like your baseball career, to the more significant, like your claim to have brokered a peace deal in Darfur. Do these exaggerations undermine the rationale for your candidacy?
— As governor and representative from New Mexico, you’ve been a supporter of gun rights, including voting against background checks. But as a Democratic presidential candidate you’ve come out in favor of them. Are you moving away from your New Mexico record to appeal to the Democratic primary voter?
For Sen. Joe Biden:
— Your plan for Iraq would establish three separate self-governing regions. Wouldn’t this plan act as a prelude to a violent and uncontrollable breakup of that country?
— In 2006 you supported the Senate’s immigration reform bill “because it was the best option available.” You also recently said better border security, employer punishment and a guest worker program were important to the current immigration reform bill. What would a perfect bill look like?
For Sen. Chris Dodd:
— Why are you stalling on holding a hearing about the executive pay bill that would give shareholders more say on executive pay?
— While you have said you support rolling back the Bush tax cuts, you’ve also said the estate tax should be “moderated” or eliminated for some. How precisely should the estate tax be changed?
Most likely the photoshops will be R-rated or worse...
Cheers!
Live “red carpet” interviews with NH Dems attending the debate...
http://www.wmur.com/video/13434354/index.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.