Skip to comments.
[Sandra Day] O'Connor: Attacks on judges 'appalling'
NewsOK.com ^
| Fri June 1, 2007
| unattributed
Posted on 06/02/2007 8:58:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Recent attacks on "activist judges" by legislative bodies could be putting the concept of an independent judiciary at risk, retired Associate Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said Friday. "These are appalling times," O'Connor told a crowd of 700 during a moderated discussion about her career at the University of Tulsa. "There is so much rancor and dislike going on." O'Connor asked the crowd if it heard of the attacks on so-called "godless, secular humanist, activist judges," and cited cases in several states where people attempted to introduce ballot measures that would toss judges in jail for making the wrong decisions or shorten their terms on the bench... She said an independent judiciary enables judges to resolve cases fairly, "and let the chips fall where they may," even if the legislative branch isn't happy with the outcome... O'Connor also discussed her recent role as a member of the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan commission that met to assess the current and prospective situation in Iraq and the surrounding region. The report called for a gradual troop pullout and more aggressive regional diplomacy.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; blackrobedtyrants; judiciary; moralabsolutes; sandradayoconnor; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: SunkenCiv
O'Connor told a crowd of 700 during a moderated discussion about her career at the University of Tulsa. "There is so much rancor and dislike going on.There would be little rancor if judges would stick to being judges. But they want to legislate. Thus, they are attacked like any other politician.
21
posted on
06/02/2007 9:18:06 PM PDT
by
JCEccles
(“Politics ain’t beanbag” Finley Peter Dunne)
To: blam
Get a clue from the real people of this country, your views of what we want and what we should have or not are not of your choosing. You work for us and what we want, not what you want. If you don’t like it, try imposing your will on God, because he is your next judge, and his views are our views... so get used to it. Your views are meaningless and will be overturned by Him.
22
posted on
06/02/2007 9:18:31 PM PDT
by
Stayfree
(*************************Get your copy of The Fred Factor by David Gill at Capitol Hill Comedy.com)
To: SunkenCiv
They’re feeling the heat.
Which can only mean one thing: It’s time to crank it up a lot higher...
23
posted on
06/02/2007 9:18:40 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(A wolf in sheep's clothing is much more dangerous than a wolf in drag.)
To: SunkenCiv
Sandra Day O'Connor: Attacks on judges 'appalling' Justices citing other countries laws and customs is well beyond appalling.
24
posted on
06/02/2007 9:19:58 PM PDT
by
RJL
To: SunkenCiv
When are you pathetic peasants going to learn that we’re above you?
25
posted on
06/02/2007 9:20:20 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: JCEccles
Out of touch with reality and reason...imagine what an adjustment for her when her judgment day comes!
26
posted on
06/02/2007 9:20:54 PM PDT
by
Stayfree
(*************************Get your copy of The Fred Factor by David Gill at Capitol Hill Comedy.com)
To: SunkenCiv
27
posted on
06/02/2007 9:21:06 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: FlyVet
Disregard post #20, posted on the wrong thread. I hate it when I do that.
28
posted on
06/02/2007 9:21:20 PM PDT
by
FlyVet
To: SunkenCiv; 8mmMauser; wagglebee
Attacks on activist judges? Let’s ask Terri Schiavo’s opinion on that.
29
posted on
06/02/2007 9:23:30 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
To: SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
Judges are first lawyers. Then, unlike most lawyers who love money, judges decide they would rather have power than cash. Thus they are more dangerous than the average lawyer. Watch them, criticize them, and when possible remove them when they get out of line.
31
posted on
06/02/2007 9:26:22 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
To: SunkenCiv
Judicial accountability is imperative. Our justice system is inoperable without it.
Bad judges should be sentenced to stiff criminal penalties—not just bounced off the bench—when clear malfeasance, gross derelict, obstruction of justice, or provable bias can be established.
Other public servants are held to that standard, it’s beyond high time judges are too.
32
posted on
06/02/2007 9:31:04 PM PDT
by
KJC1
To: gorush
It also allows judges to resolve cases unfairly and with extreme bias. Yes it does, however since we are a democratic republic and not a democracy, mob doesn't rule and thank God we have a representative government to make choices on our behalf while we pursue individual gain while at the same time promoting our system of government.
33
posted on
06/02/2007 9:32:48 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: SunkenCiv
Someone should remind this socialist activist, that her ilk on the SCOTUS were responsible for the grotesque violation of the Fifth Amendemnt recently denying the ownership of private property to US citizens at the will of the governments....
So, how does Comrade O’Connor explain these liberal activists who deliberately violated the Constitution and have STILL gotten away with it -— ???
34
posted on
06/02/2007 9:33:06 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: FlyVet
Well, I don’t have to tell you, we expected that sumbitch to light up like a Christmas tree and flat-out walk the dog. But it didn’t. Turns out the new orange shag carpet I’d put on the floor was so thick it was keeping the cool “barefoot” gas pedal I’d installed from going all the way down.
35
posted on
06/02/2007 9:33:52 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's like people who hate corn bread and hate anchovies, but love cornchovie bread.)
To: SunkenCiv
In other words she believes that judges are not to administer and interpret the law, but to make the law (activist judges) and no doubt to enforce (judicial order) in addition to their Constitutional duties. I guess she doesn’t believe in a 3 branch government, Judicial, Legislative and Executive. Kind of makes one wonder why the GOP let Ginsberg take her seat which should have been kicked out, or BORKED.
36
posted on
06/02/2007 9:34:14 PM PDT
by
Sam Ketcham
(Amnesty means vote dilution, & increased taxes to bring us down to the world poverty level.)
To: EagleUSA
I was just thinking of Jerry Falwell and how he warned Reagan about O’Connor, and how Reagan stubbornly refused to listen because he had promised “a woman” on the court in the 1980 campaign.
37
posted on
06/02/2007 9:35:54 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: FlyVet
O’Connor: another AZ embarrassment!
38
posted on
06/02/2007 9:37:13 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: Theodore R.
Somebody tell this senile idiot woman to go home and do her nails and water her plants and forget she was ever stupidly confirmed to the Court by a gaggle of whores and scoundrels.
To: Jaysun
You only left out the AstroTurf in the back of the El Camino.
40
posted on
06/02/2007 9:40:10 PM PDT
by
FlyVet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson