Posted on 06/01/2007 5:41:16 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
If you think we are nationally a distinct minority on this issue, it is you who needs to get a clue.
If the jack boot fits...
>>If the jack boot fits...
<<
???
Please limit your posts to intelligent ones.
I'm sorry, I should have been more specific. I mean "America" the nation state, formally known as the United States of America. Not "America" the dominant element of the North American intra-national economic system. A subtle difference, to be sure, and many people fail to realize that their long term goals are not always parallel.
Well said!!!!
Actually, I am mad as hell with Bush about the boarders and the spending the GOP has done while in charge. However, when you read posts here it’s easy to see the DU’s are here fueling the fire against GW and many people are falling for it. Maybe the DU’s should be watching the dems as they load the pork into the spending bills........
I’m all for expressing our displeasure with our administration........ but I also remember Reagan’s 11 commandment!
Incorrect
They learned they barely lost majorities in both houses of Congress. It is time to pick new leadership for the Republican Party, starting at the top. George Bush has failed to successfully lead the country and is now a lame duck.
Exactly right. There’s a big picture and most don’t have a clue. Nobody would advocate open borders in time of war unless he had integration with Mexico/points south/Canada in mind.
Bingo.
(As for China, don’t brush your teeth with toothpaste made in China....mostly sold in low cost stores and most have Japanese sounding names. It’s contaminated. As were the petfoods they tampered with and God only knows what else they ship over here.)
I’m a Jeff Sessions fan. (Big smile here.)
Heard over the radio that NH still doesn’t have to fasten seatbelts, although your gov. was signing gay union rights into law...Wasn’t there a movement to eliminate ‘Live Free or Die’ from license plates? Hope that went down in flames.
Last night I watched MSNBC -— Russert’s liberal/dem journalist panel discussing Republicans running for President. (They tiptoed through the Hillary Iowa mine field...nobody dared mention the four letter word that starts with L. Lose.) As for Mitt/McCain/Rudy etc., they clearly don’t think any has a chance. Mitt was described as a ‘robot’ candidate, too good to be real. McCain is self-destructing. (Hunter they didn’t mention.) Rudy’s marital mess evoked low voices...Andrea Mitchell was saddened about obvious bitterness at the family’s recent Princeton graduation.
Fred Thompson...well, he’s ‘no RR’, as the ‘conservative base will soon realize’. No hope there. Besides, he’s ‘lazy, has nothing substantive on his senate record’, and he also has that young wife and two small children, which they seemed to think would distract him from serious business. Just an actor. So that’s that according to Russert’s Liberal experts. (I can hardly wait to see them eat their words.)
Michelle Malkin on O’Reilly a few nights ago made a suggestion that Americans might believe GW was serious about enforcing the border if he deported the 600,000 plus illegals already incarcerated. O’Reilly had to admit that was a good point. (As always, Michelle was terrific.)
Leading up to WWI England did not protect their industrial base while Germany and the USA maintained it. The result was that England was weak and Germany was able to take advantage of them. We are fast approaching that situation with China.
And I say again we don't have free trade with China or anyone for that matter at the present time.
Why is it a good thing to enable Mexico to ethnic cleanse itself of its native Indian population, the bottom quarter of its citizery, those they can’t be bothered to educate and care for? Whole villages stand empty, and the flight north is increasing. This can’t be good for Mexico or anyone else. (You don’t have to be Einstein to know who benefits.) Mexicans/whoever who come for jobs, a better life...dream of living in a country resembling Mexico in every way but corruption/violence/illiteracy. Assimilation isn’t on their list. They want greater Mexico, the Spanish culture and language, and most want a socialist agenda. Some even demand reparations and taking over the southwest, including Colorado. When they get the vote, and they will, what’s to stop them from achieving the whole enchilada?
Where is the incentive for positive change in Mexico? They kick out those most like to head revolution, in fact handing them maps of the border, even telling them to head for Canada....”Canada, hey, you need cheap labor!” A few rich families will continue to buy up real estate and control whatever’s left in Mexico. What’s to stop the drug lords and the violence that’s spilling over the border? The beheadings of police and the rape and murder of hundreds of Mexican women. This is a culture disconnect about to land in our lap.
Plain speaking, honesty to the point of bluntness...that’s what the voters are looking for and desperately need. If Fred lays it all out in policy papers and/or speeches, what’s going on, what he thinks we should do, calls for input...even if the pill is bitter, if we’re convinced it’s right, we’ll take it. One big problem with this ‘amnesty’ bill is Ted Kennedy. If he’s in favor of anything, you automatically distrust it. Or should.
Fred Barnes on Fox’s Beltway Boys last night said GW had lambasted Kyl, repub. sen. from Arizona, who’d been against the last immigration nightmare bill, but when he’d seen ground zero in Arizona, had decided we had to do something — the border was out of control —so he’d worked on this bill and gotten more concessions from Ted Kennedy than he’d given up. Well, Fred’s in favor of the bill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.