Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Latest White House Immigration FAQ
Jawa Report ^ | May 31, 2007 | Frank J.

Posted on 05/31/2007 1:21:43 PM PDT by 3AngelaD

IMMIGRATION BILL FAQ

Q. I'm concerned that the immigration bill focuses more on giving illegal immigrants amnesty than border protection. Does the President share these concerns?

A. The President doesn't hate brown people.

Q. This isn't a racial issue. Many people think this bill will only encourage more illegal immigration and leave our borders open and dangerous. What are the answer to these charges?

A. To answer your underlying question, I'm afraid the the President is against your proposal to commit genocide against Hispanics.

Q. This isn't about Hispanics! This is about our laws being respected and our national security!

A. Unfortunately, America has had a long history of closed-minded bigots like you who hate all immigrants and want to keep the nation white and pure. To answer what we can only assume will be your next question, no, jackboots aren't tax deductible, but have fun in your neo-Nazi march anyway.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amnesty; bush; corporateblackmail; deafrino; georgewbush; illegalimmigration; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Shouldn't be funny, but it is.
1 posted on 05/31/2007 1:21:45 PM PDT by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Here is my FAQ:

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???????????


2 posted on 05/31/2007 1:25:58 PM PDT by Red Badger (Bite your tongue. It tastes a lot better than crow................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
This isn't from the Jawa Report. A piece of this article was merely excerpted there. The original is available here:

http://www.imao.us/archives/007850.html

IMMIGRATION BILL FAQ

Q. I'm concerned that the immigration bill focuses more on giving illegal immigrants amnesty than border protection. Does the President share these concerns?
A. The President doesn't hate brown people.

Q. This isn't a racial issue. Many people think this bill will only encourage more illegal immigration and leave our borders open and dangerous. What are the answer to these charges?
A. To answer your underlying question, I'm afraid the the President is against your proposal to commit genocide against Hispanics.

Q. This isn't about Hispanics! This is about our laws being respected and our national security!
A. Unfortunately, America has had a long history of closed-minded bigots like you who hate all immigrants and want to keep the nation white and pure. To answer what we can only assume will be your next question, no, jackboots aren't tax deductible, but have fun in your neo-Nazi march anyway.

Q. I'm not against immigrants! Why can't you people understand there is a difference between legal and illegal immigration?! I'm only objecting to the illegal ones!
A. Calm down. It's this frothing at the mouth anger that causes your irrational views on immigration. To answer your other concerns, Hispanics actually have excellent hygiene, are not lazy, and aren't all criminals. Also, there has been no genetic evidence that Hispanics are inferior to the white man. I'd be careful about believing just any pamphlet handed out at your KKK meetings.

Q. With President Bush already having shaky support, do you think it's wise to label people with legitimate concerns about illegal immigration "racists"?
A. Did anyone ever tell you have many blatantly homosexual tendencies?

Q. That's it. I'm leaving the Republican Party.
A. And go where? The Green Party? Yeah, you have fun with that you brown-people hating, Nazi homo. Thanks for the questions!

3 posted on 05/31/2007 1:26:35 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
The travesty is that the White House (and the WSJ) both believe that, if you object to their bill, you are, by definition, a racist.

Anybody have any remaining doubts that El Presidente is a liberal that just happens to agree with conservatives on a couple of policy issues? He is certainly well versed in typical liberal debating technique — i.e. if you don’t agree with me in every detail, you’re a racist, sexist, heartless homophobe.

4 posted on 05/31/2007 1:27:33 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Livin’ la Vida Loca, PING!


5 posted on 05/31/2007 1:27:43 PM PDT by AmericanGunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Here is my FAQ:

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???????????

My thoughts as well.

6 posted on 05/31/2007 1:29:03 PM PDT by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Someone send this to Tony Snow ASAP!


7 posted on 05/31/2007 1:29:12 PM PDT by The Blitherer (If we take anything out of the pledge, take out the word “indivisible” and then kick out California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

It really isn’t funny as this is how the White House is framing the issue. They are right and their opponents are bigots and xenophobes. This tactic of insulting your opponent when you are losing the argument is a ‘rat strategy that’s been adopted by the RINO’s.


8 posted on 05/31/2007 1:29:28 PM PDT by 50mm (la prensa dos en traducir mi línea de etiqueta al inglés)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
Given all the ifs, ands and buts in the bill, it's simply another try at circumventing the Thirteenth Amendment.

Just another reason why we have to dump the RINOs and Country Clubbers from the Republican party. It's not like we don't know about the slavery issue ~

9 posted on 05/31/2007 1:29:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette

“The travesty is that the White House (and the WSJ) both believe that, if you object to their bill, you are, by definition, a racist.”

Actually, they don’t. It is nothing more than a tactic. A nasty one. They are desperate for this to go through.


10 posted on 05/31/2007 1:33:53 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

“Someone send this to Tony Snow ASAP!””

Did you forget the sarc tag?


11 posted on 05/31/2007 1:35:13 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Numbers USA facts, well worth watching:

http://www.numbersusa.com/video/?authkey=c8782d7962297d104474360a07450f8c


12 posted on 05/31/2007 1:42:44 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Coming Soon:

Libre República (Free Republic Spanish version)


13 posted on 05/31/2007 1:55:10 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator ("You can observe a lot just by watching." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

That would be República Libre. We should at least respect the laws of grammar, even though a number of our actual laws are being ignored.


14 posted on 05/31/2007 1:59:59 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 50mm; greyfoxx39; MHGinTN

BUMP!!!


15 posted on 05/31/2007 2:17:23 PM PDT by colorcountry ("You step in crap once and spend the rest of your life scraping it off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark; B4Ranch; Travis McGee

Ping to post #3


16 posted on 05/31/2007 3:17:25 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Answer: I refuse to discuss border protection!


17 posted on 05/31/2007 3:53:29 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; 3AngelaD

Q: Do we really want to grant amnesty to illegal alien gang members?

A: You are trying to scare people with those hurtful, bigoted words. You should ask, do we want to affirm human rights for disadvantaged workers belonging to a misunderstood community group.


18 posted on 05/31/2007 4:22:32 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Illegals: representation without taxation--Citizens: taxation without representation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

“Answer: I refuse to discuss border protection!”

Bottom Line!


19 posted on 05/31/2007 5:12:44 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“Q: Do we really want to grant amnesty to illegal alien gang members?

A: You are trying to scare people with those hurtful, bigoted words”

LMAO!


20 posted on 05/31/2007 5:14:41 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson