Posted on 05/31/2007 1:01:00 PM PDT by kronos77
This is a direct threat of assasination against the President of the United States. I don't care how disappointed I am, or any of us are, with our president, this is not to be taken lightly.
“This is a direct threat of assassination against the President of the United States.”
Exactly my thoughts. Since when is someone allowed to write the president and threaten his life, without any repercussions? Unfortunately we’d probably only throw him in prison, giving him the ability to brain-wash 100 more lost souls, enabling them to think just as he does. Guys like this just need to be shot, and that’s the truth. There is no way for him to change his ways, nor would he ever try to. Be ready for the moment when you start to understand the thoughts and actions of Slobodan Milosevic, “...and when they (muslims) behead your own people [...] then you will know what this was all about.”
This moment is right around the corner.
The guy looks like the caveman guy from the Geico ads!
Take a number, I got first dibs!
It pleases me that these idiots are so frustrated that they have to spend their time and limited brainpower writing this crap. We must be doing something right.
I’d fork out good money to see that traitor do a dance at the end of a rope!
“Adam!
I will not convert!
I will not pay!
So, were does that leave us?”
Time to ‘Rock-N-Roll’ Bro!
He sounds just like a typical liberal Democrat or someone from the NY Times editorial page.
And unfortunately Edwards was right, in a backhanded sort of way -- although I doubt he knew why he was right!
How do you have a "war on a tactic" and not on a country or a people? How do you get in bed with the same people who are sponsoring this war against America and then say that we are fighting the tactics that our bedfellows are sponsoring? How do you not secure our borders, knowing that terrorists are among the illegal Mexicans -- and still claim that you are "keeping America safe from terrorists"? The "war on terror is a bumper-sticker slogan" when we refuse to identify the enemy until after he is a perpetrator of violence against us, because that is the only choice that "a war on a tactic" leaves us.
We need "a war on Islamic terrorists"! Problem is that it is not PC to say this, because we have yet to find a way to separate "the terrorists" from "the ordinary Muslims". This because even the line within Islam, as to who agrees with using terrorism against the US, is blurry when you hear how many "ordinary Muslims" think that terrorism against us is OK "in certain circumstances".
You are right that "America has changed" -- we used to know who our enemies and our friends are. Now, we have no "friends" -- only "interests", and no "enemies", only "interests". If we can't identify who our enemies are, there is no way that we can fight them and win!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.