Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Brightside

“I oppose the exclusion of either faith or reason from the discussion. An attempt by either to seek a monopoly on these questions would be wrong-headed.”

A safe position, and one of moderation. Too bad the liberals demand anything having to do remotely with God to be excluded from everything public, including discussion.


2 posted on 05/31/2007 4:31:45 AM PDT by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: txzman

I am a software engineer.

I used to be an atheistic evolutionist.

However, as an engineer and information technologist, I know that randomness does not introduce new information, but rather corrupts existing information. No matter how many iterations you run, and you can run many, many billions in a few minutes, the result of randomness is, well, randomness, and when it is applied to existing information, the result is always deleterious.

Evolutionism is a sacred cow religion.

It’s every bit as fanatical and self-righteous, and every bit as silly, as the droolings of the pedophile “prophet” Mahomet.

Mahomet taught that Jews descended from apes and pigs, so I guess that makes him an evolutionist, too.


22 posted on 05/31/2007 5:56:38 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: txzman

This is why they cling SO tightly to the Evolutionary religion -

it’s the only belief that can completely exclude any higher power (to be accountable to).


32 posted on 05/31/2007 7:28:03 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson