Why blatantly steal the wealth and property of Americans who earned it - and hand it straight over to mexican peasants who didn’t earn, but instead broke the law to get it?
Posted on 05/30/2007 3:34:26 PM PDT by rellimpank
Americans -- at least really stupid Americans like George Bush -- believe the natural state of the world is to have individual self-determination, human rights, the rule of law and a robust democratic economy. On this view, most of the existing world and almost all of world history is a freakish aberration.
In fact, the natural state of the world is Darfur. The freakish aberration is America and the rest of the Anglo-Saxon world.
The British Empire once spread the culture of prosperity around the globe -- Judeo-Christian values, tolerance, equality, private property and the rule of law. All recipients of the British Empire's largesse benefited, but the empire's most successful colony was the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
Cool - thanks for that reply.
Ann is an intellectual - you have to read her stuff carefully to be careful to know the humor from the hard agruments.
I like bombastic!
“But if Bush is impeached, who will fight to make far-off countries safe for a democratically elected government to impose sharia law? Who will spend our country’s treasure to build schools for Muslims to teach hatred of all non-Muslims.”
What? You don’t think President Cheney would continue those policies? *gasp!*
Neither do I.
I don't mean to be impolite, but that is complete nonsense.
We will lose it if the amnesty isn't stopped. The GOP should have taken care of this in 1996 but members of their own party sabotaged the good legislation they almost passed and now we're paying for it.
Why blatantly steal the wealth and property of Americans who earned it - and hand it straight over to mexican peasants who didn’t earn, but instead broke the law to get it?
I guess that's really your central point that I'm calling nonsense.
I was a really stupid American in the sense Ann uses it, too. I believed Iraqis wanted freedom and democracy, that everyone in the Middle East wants freedom, and that deposing Saddam with a little rebuilding was all we had to do as we watched the ME dominoes fall.
If I read the chicken entrails correctly, is the core of neoconservatism. It’s Wilsonian, I admit. Turns out it’s also wrong.
Coulter is, I believe, repudiating neoconservatism and Bush as its leader.
She says that our 'dumb' President Bush holds the minority view in world history to think the American US culture and democracy are worth saving.
Context kiddies.
These Mexicans and other 3rd worlders will turn the U.S.A not into a futurisic technologically advanced civilization but into a 3rd world banana Republic and then into a socialist state as is McCain and the Democrats' intent.
Mass immigration of hundreds of millions of uneducated third worlders actually holds back automation and technological advancement. Why build that new robot or huge farm equipment if you have illegals? The 3rd world has billions of such poor people. Uneducated masses don’t help the economy . It is technological advancement and automation that increases business productivity which is what ultimately raises living standards.
Actually it was the bubonic plague which got Europe out of the dark ages.There was such a shortage of workers because of people dying that employers had to automate . and that is what started European technological advancement and industrialization.
To me, Mark Steyn is our lifetime’s Mark Twain, a combination of PJ O’Rourke and HL Mencken. There’s none better.
Ann is on par with Michelle Malkin and, sad to say, Al Franken, bludgeons to Steyn’s sword.
Even with the amazing greatness that America has earned over the centuries with the attributes that Coulter mentioned, has much of the world followed our example? Of course they haven't, and there is your proof that it's not a "natural state". That is how I read it.
Americans – at least really stupid Americans like George Bush – believe the natural state of the world is to have individual self-determination, human rights, the rule of law and a robust democratic economy. On this view, most of the existing world and almost all of world history is a freakish aberration.
In fact, the natural state of the world is Darfur. The freakish aberration is America and the rest of the Anglo-Saxon world.
The British Empire once spread the culture of prosperity around the globe – Judeo-Christian values, tolerance, equality, private property and the rule of law. All recipients of the British Empire’s largesse benefited, but the empire’s most successful colony was the United States.
At the precise moment in history when the U.S. has abandoned any attempt to transmit Anglo-Saxon virtues to its own citizens, much less to immigrants, George Bush wants to grant citizenship to hordes of immigrants who are here precisely because they are fleeing cultures that are utterly dysfunctional and ruinous for the humans who live in them.
Yes, this country has absorbed huge migrations of illiterate peasants in the past – notably Italian immigrants at the turn of the last century. But also notably, half of them went back. We got the good ones. America was not yet a welfare state guaranteeing room and board to the luckless, the lazy and the incompetent from cradle to grave.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, immigrant and first Jewish member of the Supreme Court, said that Americanization required that the immigrant adopt “the clothes, the manners and the customs generally prevailing here” and that he adopt “the English language as the common medium of speech.”
But, Brandeis said, this is only part of it. “(W)e properly demand of the immigrant even more than this – he must be brought into complete harmony with our ideals and aspirations and cooperate with us for their attainment. Only when this has been done will he possess the national consciousness of an American.”
Or as George Bush would call it, “empty rhetoric.” And as Linda Chavez would call it, “racist.”
I wish our new immigrants had come to America back when the foundations of civic society and patriotism were still inculcated in all immigrants (and when half of them went home). But traitors who are citizens have destroyed all acculturating institutions. Traitors who are citizens have also destroyed all incentive for the poor to work or even keep their knees together before marriage.
Until the recipient culture is capable of doing an effective job of Americanizing immigrants, it’s preposterous to talk about a massive influx of Hispanic immigrants accomplishing anything other than turning America into yet another Latin American-style banana republic. And it is simply a fact that no one is trying to turn immigrants into Americans.
To the contrary, Democrats are trying to turn new immigrants into wards of the state – and with some success! – so they will be permanent Democratic voters. Rich Republicans and their handmaidens in Washington are trying to turn immigrants into a permanent servant class.
In an astonishing exchange on Fox News last weekend, Dan Henninger of the Wall Street Journal responded to Heather MacDonald’s point that Hispanics in this country have a 50 percent illegitimacy rate, the highest teen pregnancy rate of any group and the highest high school drop-out rate of any group, by asking: “Why don’t we feel we are under cultural assault in New York City? You have no sense of this at all here.”
You also have no sense of the existence of a middle class in New York City. The rich have hidden the evidence, transplanting all but the massively wealthy to the suburbs. Manhattan is white and getting whiter, while the boroughs are noticeably less white and more dysfunctional.
What evidence is there for the proposition that American culture will leap like a tenacious form of tuberculosis to today’s immigrants? Americans display no evident desire to defend their culture, much less transmit it, and immigrants show no evident desire to adopt it.
To the contrary, immigrants are replacing American culture with Latin American culture. Their apparent constant need to demonstrate is just one example.
As Mac Johnson wrote in Human Events last year, these immigrant protests represent “the colonization of America by the Latin style of politics.” He listed just some of the demonstrations drawing thousands – sometimes hundreds of thousands – of protesters over the last few years in Mexico alone. Among the targets of the protests were a new regional trade pact, plans to allow private investment in the state-owned electricity industry, energy and tax reforms, and support for the mayor of Mexico City.
In 1993 – long before 9-11, before the USS Cole bombing, before the bombing of our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania – the eminent Harvard political scientist Samuel P. Huntington predicted that the greatest threat to Western civilization would come from a clash of civilizations, noting with particular concern the “bloody borders” of the Muslim world.
So it ought to be of some interest that Huntington is now predicting, in his book “Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity,” that America cannot survive the cultural onslaught from Latin America.
American Hispanics responded to Huntington’s book with a flurry of scholarly papers and academic debates to counter his thesis that Mexicans were not assimilating.
Just kidding! They called for national protests against Huntington, his publisher and Harvard University.
I would modify that a bit to include DNA. If found again the the US illegally, their DNA is barred for life from entering. This includes family members (hence the reason for the DNA) even of they're applying for legal entry. That might actually help curtail the problem at the source.
Japan is an excellent example of a country that’s getting by fine with little immigration, and they’re doing it partly with increased mechanization. The problem is in the US it’s no longer a policy decision based on what’s good for the country but rather it has developed its own separate constituency. Ethnic and big business lobbies are calling the shots and until that stops we are going to continue getting immigrated into the ground.
Politicians in DC for whatever reason are determined to import a massive poverty class that will come to haunt this country in the not-too-distant future
And that poverty class will be dependent on Democrat government programs and vote for Democrats/socialism.Democrats and McCain want to create hundreds of millions of voters for big government programs and socialism. A socialist state always results in poverty, oppression, starvation, dictatorship, tyranny, misery and genocide.
McCain and Democrats only care about power and they will take everything we have worked for away just to take our right to vote them out of office away.
Good argument, especially within country. I’m all for the free trade of goods. But migratory workers, and illegal immigration especially, is another matter. A classic economics question is “why does the barber earn more in New York, than Seville?” The services are about the same, but the prevailing wages are higher in the United States. I can accept that as a bonus to citizenship.
But destruction of the republican party us what you want... Why do you pretend to have a problem with it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.