1 posted on
05/29/2007 3:40:43 PM PDT by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: lowbridge
I'm still waiting for an answer to this key question:
Who told David Corn that Plame was "undercover"?
27 posted on
05/29/2007 4:32:48 PM PDT by
Hoodat
( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
To: lowbridge
This is MSNBC. Nobody over there can read. I’ll bet their report is wrong.
29 posted on
05/29/2007 4:40:12 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: lowbridge
How can Libby obstruct an investigation that was finished the day it started?
The leakers admitted their mistake to Fitz on the first day. There was never any mystery on Fitz’ part where the leak came from. The only ones in the dark were “us”, the public. Fitz told Armitage to keep his role in the leak secret until after the “investigation” was complete.
So Fitz was investigating Libby knowing full well he had no part in the leak.
This is an abuse of office.
30 posted on
05/29/2007 4:40:38 PM PDT by
marron
To: lowbridge
If true, then there is a certain far-left website that should be worried considering how hard they worked to get this story in the news.
34 posted on
05/29/2007 5:00:45 PM PDT by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: lowbridge
Bullcrap. Plame wasn’t covert just because Patrick Fitzgerald says so
36 posted on
05/29/2007 5:16:38 PM PDT by
dennisw
(The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction)
To: lowbridge
This so-called classified summary of her employment isn’t even signed or dated. For all we know, the maintenance man could have written it, or Plame herself. Without identifying who actually put the summary together and provided it to Fitzpatrick, leaves questions as to its authenticity and the facts provided therein. During her testimony to Congress, didn’t she mention some supervisor who had stated she was “covert?” I’m thinking that this “summary” might just have been written by that same individual. She lied about her status, and he backed her up. They should have subpoenaed the individual who actually wrote the document, and have him swear to her being a “covert” agent under oath. I’d bet he’d change his tune real quick.
39 posted on
05/29/2007 5:46:46 PM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: lowbridge
The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation. Hogwash. Fitzgerald had already discovered who the leaker was before Libby ever testified. It was not feasible for Libby to interfere with that discovery. Case closed.
40 posted on
05/29/2007 5:50:53 PM PDT by
Hoodat
( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
To: lowbridge
An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003.
Any CIA agent is "covert" when overseas. When back on American assignment, they are not "covert".
50 posted on
05/30/2007 9:46:01 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: lowbridge; All
51 posted on
05/30/2007 10:00:52 AM PDT by
txroadkill
( http://iraqstar.org)
To: lowbridge
52 posted on
05/31/2007 3:43:44 AM PDT by
pookie18
([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson