Posted on 05/29/2007 3:40:41 PM PDT by lowbridge
An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003.
The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation.
The nature of Plame's CIA employment never came up in Libby's perjury and obstruction of justice trial.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
It’s BS.
Plame’s husband indicates she leaks intel like a river
on the way to bed, so perhaps the author wasn’t from CIA.
I would argue that the disclosure of the "secret CIA prisons" story was an infinitely more damaging leak to national security, and there wasn't a hint of prosecution on that one. In that light, the Libby prosecution still stinks to high heaven.
Does anybody else feel scared with the way this agency has been run for the past decade or so?
Do you have a source for that, outside of speculation by people who want this to go away?
Yeah, a CIA employee who used her CIA cover company to donate money to Al Gore's campaign.
The "secret prison" story was nothing but manufactured outrage by the MSM. And where did people really think that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was being held? He wasn't at Gitmo. Duh.
The most damaging leak was the revelation of the NSA monitoring of al Qaeda phone calls entering the USA. Tons of intel and hundreds of millions of dollars gone.
As far as Libby and Armitage go, they are no better than Wilson. Compromising our intelligence agency for political purposes is disgusting. It astonishes me that so many posters around here are cheerleaders for Libby just because they want to win a political victory.
Source? What planet have you been on? This information has been put out by way too many sources to start listing, including many (e.g. New York Times, Washington Post) that are hardly in the make-excuses-for-the-Bush-administration club. And it’s not like this is specific to Plame. It involved a huge number of covert operatives. Maybe you should look up the 1995 testimony to Congress of then CIA Director John Deutch to refresh your memory.
It’s all bull. You know that right? If Plame was covert, she and her husband sure didn’t act like it. It was all good for laughs at their cocktail parties and it was a great introduction to Joe’s credibility but secret identity? Not even close. Hell! They even go as far as hold meetings with news journalists just so they can bolster their importance.
BUT I do notice however, the people that cry about a desk jockey’s identity been blown like Plames, they couldn’t care less about any other “secrets” being publish in the news. They in fact, more sooner encourage such secrets being published in the newspapers than not.
But lets get to the reality of the whole thing. That “make-excuses-for-the-Bush-administration club” gives me a clue where you stand but I think you stand in a very poor place at that.
When Armitage talked about the Plames to the reporters, it had nothing to do with neither the Bush administration nor their dictating but it was all a joke. I mean that is just what the Plames were/are.
They were talking about then Plames, the trip Joe Wilson took and the sad sad circumstances he went to Niger. Listen to that recording again, read the transcript of it again and you can see the humor from it all. It was also, laughing at the sadist part of all, they were laughing at the CIA and how they handled the whole thing.
It doesn’t make me feel very secure knowing how inept the CIA is and after they get all that funding for doing something as stupid to send a crackpot like Joe Wilson do anything for them.
Maybe the Bush administration was wrong. Maybe they were wrong that once hearing how it all came down and how messed up it all went, sending Joe Wilson on such a mission like that, the Bush Administration should have did an investigation on what the heck is going on at the CIA and who all there is on drugs? They need to ask, what ever the CIA do, why is it always wrong? Why did they even keep Plame in the CIA in the first place. They must know she was nowhere near able to carry out her function in that outfit.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070530/a_plame30.art.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.