Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Mitch McConnell shafting the base? (updated)
American Thinker ^ | May 28, 2007 | James Lewis

Posted on 05/29/2007 10:21:32 AM PDT by 3AngelaD

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is one of the smartest conservatives in the Senate. But on the dangerous immigration bill, he has been silent as the grave. His website is conspicuously silent on immigration. This is your Republic Leadership at work. Meanwhile, Kate O'Beirne at NRO The Corner is predicting that the immigration bill will pass by 60 votes (!) That means de facto legalization of at least 12 million illegals, plus their relatives, along with another decade or two of uncontrolled immigration until we get the next amnesty bill. (Unless, of course, another Mohammed Atta terrorist cell manages to slip into the country to wreak havock.)

If US demographics shift leftward only a few percentage points, the Republicans will lose their chance to control Congress and the Presidency. So what's going on? Why is Senator McConnell so silent in the face of imminent disaster? One possibility is party loyalty to President Bush, who is well-meaning but terribly ill-advised on this bill. But another possibility is named: Fred Thompson. Former Senator Thompson hails from next door in Tennessee. Thompson is a Reaganesque figure who has been making all the right noises to enter the GOP presidential race next month.

A wave of conservative outrage against a catastrophic immigration bill might put Fred Thompson at the head of the pack, and carry him into the nomination. It may even boost him into the Presidency in 2008. Senator Mitch McConnell may be allied with former Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, who has been pushing the Thompson candidacy. Call it the Three Border State Senators, quietly singing the same song. Thompson has been making a simple point about immigration: First, build a fence and control the border. Then we can discuss how to address both legal and illegal immigration. It's common sense, and it appeals to voters across the political spectrum.

If the Kennedy-McCain bill is passed, McConnell may jump aboard the Thompson bandwagon. If it is defeated, he may finally come out against it. But what we are seeing today is a disastrous lack of leadership coming from the Senate Republican leaders. The voters have a right to ask Senator Mitch McConnell where he stands. Is he risking our national security to promote Fred Thompson's candidacy? That's a Machiavellian gambit, not a conservative one.

James Lewis blogs at http://www.dangeroustimes.wordpress.com


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: amnesty; corporateblackmail; illegalimmigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: 3AngelaD; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
It seems with each passing day that those in and aspiring to national office in the Republican Party are first required to undergo castration and lobotomy.
41 posted on 05/29/2007 4:20:20 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Oh, I think a lot of these Republicans are toast.

I don’t see how this is a winner for the Republicans at all.

Muuch less the country.


42 posted on 05/29/2007 4:20:25 PM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Could there be a chance that we need Mexican Labor?? Not every job is as technical as computer programming.

McConnell being from an Ag state needs Mexican labor and in a Democratic congress the conservatives are not going to get their way. It will be this bill or like last time, no bill.

Pray for W and Our Troops


43 posted on 05/29/2007 4:24:17 PM PDT by bray (The co-clintons freed more terrorists then they killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Perhaps the fine should be 5x as great and the companies that hired them pay it.


44 posted on 05/29/2007 5:52:45 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Mitch McConnell is a big disappointment on this.

But remember: we stopped the Dubai Ports deal; we cna stop this.

Call 1-800-417-7666 and talk to your Senators. Let’s keep the pressure on.


45 posted on 05/29/2007 9:54:21 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

‘If he’s lying, then he’s being charitable. A search of McConnell’s Senate website does find lots of pages that mention immigration. Unfortunately, they turn out to be different flavors of the “bipartisan” bullcrap. (Why does it always seem that “bipartisan” means “The GOP grabbing their ankles”?) ‘

So far McConnell’s done a pretty good job, thwarting Dingy Harry at every turn. I’m willing to give him the benefit of a doubt based on his performance since last falls election cycle.


46 posted on 05/30/2007 5:20:52 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

‘Sounds like Mitch doesn’t mind if this stinker actually passes, as long as there is some substantial debate on it. However, he doesn’t explicity support it at this time. My comments to him still stand.’

Same thing he’s been saying prior to all sorts of legislative efforts he eventually found a way to block.

I understand how you fell about it.


47 posted on 05/30/2007 5:22:16 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

IMPEACH ALL REPUBLICANS WHO VOTE FOR THIS BILL!


48 posted on 05/30/2007 5:24:23 AM PDT by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
A wave of conservative outrage against a catastrophic immigration bill might put Fred Thompson at the head of the pack, and carry him into the nomination. It may even boost him into the Presidency in 2008....If the Kennedy-McCain bill is passed, McConnell may jump aboard the Thompson bandwagon. If it is defeated, he may finally come out against it....Is he risking our national security to promote Fred Thompson's candidacy? That's a Machiavellian gambit, not a conservative one.

Ruin the country so that one candidate can be president of a destroyed country? Wouldn't be surprised with these geniuses.

49 posted on 05/30/2007 5:35:09 AM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat
Question: Why are so many that claim to be the base “cut and running” from the party now. Do they think that will male things better? How? Don`t understand how letting the Rats win therefore punishing the party will improve my grandcritters lives? Hope some one can explain?

We aren't cutting and running from the Republican Party, the Republican Party cut and run from us when it abandons conservative principles in the cynical hope of chasing some temporary political advantage.

I'll answer your questions with questions, if you don't mind. Why should we reward a party that is trying to sell out our nation? Why should we stay in a party that is betraying our principles? How will encouraging the Republicans to be more like Democrats improve your grandchildren's lives?

When the Party advances an agenda that is anti-American, as this amnesty is, I will fight them as though they were the Democrats they seem to want to be.

I will not put the Party before my country. Quite the opposite, in fact.

50 posted on 05/30/2007 6:56:42 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: highball
Cute, but taking your toys and going home never solves anything. It is easy to understand why people are upset, that`s easy, but pouting, not tying to change the party to better reflect our views, is no answer. Remember, on every single issue, the Rats position is totally unacceptable. And we aren`t going to be able to change them. As to rewarding anybody, cutting your nose off to make a point only means that you have a sharp knife.
51 posted on 05/30/2007 10:23:08 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD

Just because Mitch is not talking about it does not mean he is for it. Get real. Why say anything at this point. The smart thing would be to keep your cards close to your vest and vote against it when it comes time.


52 posted on 05/30/2007 10:26:30 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Mitch McConnell is waiting to see what’s in it for him before he votes. He’s a punk like the rest of those old rich bastards in the Senate


53 posted on 06/22/2007 11:01:13 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson