Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdWater

That’s my point. You’re saying that a leading proponent of ID claims that “ID was dead.” That doesn’t make sense. A “proponent” advocates for something; he doesn’t say it’s dead and worthless.


433 posted on 06/05/2007 11:19:51 AM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]


To: Theo

Coldwater apparently thinks that Behe is the authority on everythign- Behe has his opinions, and he is not against ID but apparently is against hte idea of creation and thinks that evolution can produce intelligent design, yet he offers no proof of such, and just has an opinion on the matter. The fact that Behe opinied on the matter in a manner favorable to Coldwater’s own opinion is apparently enough to convince coldwater that ID must be dead based on nothing more than one man’s opinion.


434 posted on 06/05/2007 11:33:01 AM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

To: Theo
That’s my point. You’re saying that a leading proponent of ID claims that “ID was dead.” That doesn’t make sense. A “proponent” advocates for something; he doesn’t say it’s dead and worthless.

No. He said "THE ID" was most probably dead since we have no evidence of "THE ID" interacting in man's evolution in the last few hundred million years.

435 posted on 06/05/2007 11:33:44 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson