Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Aussie Hotel Wins Right To Ban Heterosexuals, Lesbians
Breitbart.com ^ | May 28 05:00 AM US/Eastern | AFP

Posted on 05/28/2007 5:11:25 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

Gay Aussie Hotel Wins Right To Ban Heterosexuals, Lesbians

May 28 05:00 AM US/Eastern

An Australian hotel popular with gay men has won the right to refuse entry to heterosexuals and lesbians, officials and the owner said Monday.

The Peel Hotel in Melbourne won an exemption from the Equal Opportunity Act to prevent insults and abuse directed toward gays in its bars and nightclubs, owner Tom McFeely told AFP.

"The hotel predominantly markets itself towards homosexual males, towards gay men and we want to protect the integrity of the venue as well as continue to make the men feel comfortable," McFeely said.

"When large numbers of heterosexuals or even lesbians are in the hotel that changes the atmosphere and many gay men can feel uncomfortable."

The landmark decision by a civil tribunal gives the establishment -- which does not offer accommodation -- the right to refuse entry to people considered a threat to the safety and comfort of its patrons.

Helen Szoke, the chief executive of the Victoria state government's Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, said the Peel Hotel's gay clientele had experienced harassment, hostility and violence.

"(They) also have felt as though they've been like a zoo exhibit with big groups of women on hens' parties coming to the club," she said.

McFeely said his aim was not to ban all straight patrons and lesbians but to limit their numbers so gay men could freely express their sexuality.

He said he expected a backlash from other patrons, but added: "I'm not worried about it because to be frank I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think.

"My main motivation is to protect my gay male customers and I realise heterosexuals and lesbians may be upset. but I don't care about that.

"We are open at 8.00pm and we go all the way through till the morning. We have two dancefloors -- it is a nightclub environment."

McFeely said it would be easy to sort out desirable gays from undesirable straights and lesbians.

"It is particularly easy to implement with the females 'cause that is pretty obvious.

"With the heterosexual males, if they identify themselves as that at the door, or indeed we question their behaviour in the venue and if they come across as being heterosexual, then we will simply ask them to leave if the behaviour is unappropriate."

Human rights group Liberty Victoria supported the decision, vice-president Michael Pearce said.

"There are numerous places where heterosexual people can go," he said.

"I think what (the tribunal) has said is that there aren't that many places where gay people can go and meet without the risk of being harassed or vilified, and that they are entitled to have their own spaces to do that in."


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: australia; breaking; culturewar; discrimination; downunder; gay; heterophobia; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; liberalism; moralabsolutes; multicult; pc; search; secularism
"Gay Aussie hotel wins right to ban heterosexuals..."

That's okay with me. I have no business whatsoever in these sort of places.

However...the issue everybody should be focsuing on is if it is now also legal for heterosexual business establishments to ban homosexuals from the premises.

After all, what is sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander, right?

1 posted on 05/28/2007 5:11:26 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

What heterosexual would want to go to a hotel club that looks like this? Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
2 posted on 05/28/2007 5:12:52 PM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
How is it a hotel if it does not offer accommodations?

As a USA citizen, I am aware their are some language variances between the US and other English speaking countries, but....

Hotel?

3 posted on 05/28/2007 5:30:18 PM PDT by sarasmom (I avoid pointless acts of violence, while continuing to hone my skills of inflicting lethal force.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I’m for taking it a step farther. Only allow homosexual males to attend a club like this and none other - isolate the rump rangers.


4 posted on 05/28/2007 5:36:35 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Plus they only allow entry from the rear.


5 posted on 05/28/2007 5:37:55 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
...owner Tom McFeely...

McFigures!

6 posted on 05/28/2007 5:38:29 PM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The right to NOT associate — is that a fundamental human right ? Should that be allowed in the USA ?


7 posted on 05/28/2007 5:40:22 PM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Laughing... gay men feel threatened by lesbians? What a riot!


8 posted on 05/28/2007 5:53:30 PM PDT by FRForever (http://www.constitutionparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FRForever

Yep.

If there was a food ladder for wimps, they would be on the lowest rung.


9 posted on 05/28/2007 5:58:13 PM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

10 posted on 05/28/2007 5:58:27 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
"... heterosexuals or even lesbians are in the hotel that changes the atmosphere and many gay men can feel uncomfortable." Isn't that special. WE'RE not supposed to feel uncomfortable around them, we're supposed to be tolerant and accepting, but they can be as intolerant as they want. Wouldn't want them to feel uncomfortable. What about how the atmosphere changes when they're having their gay day parades (here in DC it's in DuPont Circle at Halloween), running around in public with their rear ends and other body parts exposed? That makes ME uncomfortable.

But you're right about the way that place looks, and it has to be absolutely crawling with some very unfriendly bacteria and viruses. The only way I would go in there would be if I had one of those full-body suits the astronauts wear. But I can't think why I would go there. And the owner looks like a prize perv.

11 posted on 05/28/2007 6:51:07 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They've screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

[I] After all, what is sauce for the goose is also sauce for the gander, right?[/I]

wouldn’t that be sauce for the gander is also sauce for the gander in this instance?


12 posted on 05/28/2007 7:45:32 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (everybody's shot. drive the truck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
...we want to protect the integrity of the venue as well as continue to make the men feel comfortable,"...an excellent rationale for banning gays from the military.....
13 posted on 05/28/2007 8:58:51 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

This is what chaps my hide about such “people”. A business can’t refuse to hire gays, a hotel can’t forbid them, etc. etc........but boy oh boy they can sure have it THEIR way, can’t they.

NO sense of fairness in this world any longer.


14 posted on 05/28/2007 9:02:58 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
"The Peel Hotel in Melbourne won an exemption from the Equal Opportunity Act"

Do you think hotels that would like only straight clinets could get an exemption? Naaahhh...

"He said he expected a backlash from other patrons, but added: "I'm not worried about it because to be frank I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think.

"My main motivation is to protect my gay male customers and I realise heterosexuals and lesbians may be upset. but I don't care about that."

Well isn't that so "tolerant" of him? You can tell he really is a man that opposes "discrimination" of any sort. He really "cares" about the feelings of others. (sarc)

15 posted on 05/29/2007 12:34:10 AM PDT by Pinkbell (Hunter/Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

They are the Master Race, just ask them.


16 posted on 05/29/2007 1:48:43 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson