To: ColdWater
Thus, radiocarbon dating is only accurate up to 3,500 years. You have already admitted that you were ignorant on the technicalities of radiocarbon dating so you should not make such sweeping, false statements. I know enough about it to know that it is a fact that the evolutionists have to assume that the dates on the RadioCarbon dating are not being affected by changes that came from a Global Flood.
All dating by Evolutionists is made to fit their own evolutionary paradigm.
223 posted on
05/31/2007 5:51:48 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! -Abe Lincoln)
To: fortheDeclaration
I know enough about it to know that it is a fact that the evolutionists have to assume that the dates on the RadioCarbon dating are not being affected by changes that came from a Global Flood. Repeat: There is NO archeological or geological evidence for your flood. NOTHING in ancient Chinese or Egyptian history to indicate such a catastrophe.
To: fortheDeclaration
So you admit you know nothing of radiometric dating, nor do you understand nuclear physics.
And why would scientists of every type (biology, chemistry, physics, geology, astronomy, etc) who have studies and practiced sceince for years, if not decades, assume there was a global flood when not only is there no evidence of such a thing, but it counters all of the real world evidence. You can live in your own theistic bubble, but it doesn't make what you believe to be true. Or are you saying that all of science, and I mean all of it, is wrong?
241 posted on
05/31/2007 7:00:20 AM PDT by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: fortheDeclaration
I know enough about it to know that it is a fact that the evolutionists have to assume that the dates on the RadioCarbon dating are not being affected by changes that came from a Global Flood. It is archaeologists, soil scientists, and similar experts who use radiocarbon dating. It only extends back some 50,000 years. "Evolutionists" rely more on other forms of radiometric dating.
So we don't account for the global flood in radiocarbon dating? We don't account for pink unicorns either. There is about the same amount of evidence for pink unicorns as a global flood at about 4350 years ago.
247 posted on
05/31/2007 8:57:42 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: fortheDeclaration
"All dating by Evolutionists is made to fit their own evolutionary paradigm." Yes, we are all very evil people determined to make sure you never get to Heaven.
259 posted on
05/31/2007 1:14:15 PM PDT by
b_sharp
(The last door on your right. Jiggle the handle.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson