It is archaeologists, soil scientists, and similar experts who use radiocarbon dating. It only extends back some 50,000 years. "Evolutionists" rely more on other forms of radiometric dating.
So we don't account for the global flood in radiocarbon dating? We don't account for pink unicorns either. There is about the same amount of evidence for pink unicorns as a global flood at about 4350 years ago.
Which is also based on assumptions.
You know you cannot date rocks!
So we don't account for the global flood in radiocarbon dating? We don't account for pink unicorns either. There is about the same amount of evidence for pink unicorns as a global flood at about 4350 years ago.
Regardless of the source of the inconsistency, the fact that 14C, with a half-life of only 5730 years, is readily detected throughout the Phanerozoic part of the geological record argues the half billion years of time uniformitarians assign to this portion of earth history is likely incorrect. The relatively narrow range of 14C/C ratios further suggests the Phanerozoic organisms may all have been contemporaries and that they perished simultaneously in the not so distant past. Finally, we note there are hints that 14C currently exists in carbon from environments sealed from biospheric interchange since very early in the earth history. We therefore conclude the 14C evidence provides significant support for a model of earth’s past involving a recent global Flood cataclysm and possibly also for a young age for the earth itself. http://www.globalflood.org/papers/2003ICCc14.html
What is more unlikely then a pink unicorn is something comeing from nothing and life coming from non-life.
So either it is God created everything, or nothing did.