1 posted on
05/25/2007 12:39:14 PM PDT by
dennisw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: dennisw
amnesty am-nes-ty -n 1. a general pardon for offenses against a government
We have been fighting the amnesty bill as if the future of our country depends on our efforts... because it does. As working, voting, law-abiding, thinking Americans, we can only come to one conclusion: the Senate will intentionally ignore the will of the people, and put their own political ambitions ahead of what is good for the United States of America. This agenda is unacceptable, and we have rejected it utterly. Moreover, it constitutes a direct threat to the future of this republic, because it indicates that there are members of the body politic who no longer answer to the will of the people, the Constitution, or even to rational thought itself.
THE REPRESENTATIVES WHO WILL VOTE TO SUPPORT THIS BILL ARE VOTING ANTI-AMERICAN.
Keep the pressure on, because the Senate is hoping this will all just go away if they wait long enough. Write, call, email, and fax your representatives... and DO NOT STOP. If you are unable to reach your Congressional or Senate rep, try the office of El Presidente. Contact your local and state party representatives, and the Republican and Democrat National Committees. Keep building the tidal wave that we need to KILL THIS BILL!
Links and contact info:
CONTACT YOUR REPS NOW
MORE CONTACT INFO
Stop Amnesty Now!... a must read
2 posted on
05/25/2007 12:42:06 PM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: dennisw
I can sum it up in two words: CHEAP LABOR. Congress and the president are looking to induct a new crop of serfs who work cheaper than the citizens and have no upward mobility because they’ll never learn English. They’ll die being waiters, janitors, and manual labor.
To: dennisw
Very interesting. Probably one of the best I’ve read on the subject.
4 posted on
05/25/2007 12:49:53 PM PDT by
The Blitherer
(800-882-2005, 1 then 1 to get direct to your Sr. Senator, 2, then 1 to get your Jr. Senator!!)
To: dennisw
Republican lawmakers we spoke with knew that naturalized Latin American immigrants and their offspring vote mostly for the Democratic Party, but still most of them (all except five) were unambiguously in favor of amnesty and of continued mass immigration (at least from Mexico). This seemed paradoxical, and explaining their motivations was more challenging. However, while acknowledging that they may not now receive their votes, they believed that these immigrants are more malleable than the existing American: That with enough care, convincing, and "teaching," they could be converted, be grateful, and become dependent on them. Republicans seemed to idealize the patron-client relation with Hispanics as much as their Democratic competitors did.
It is time to FIRE nearly every elected republican in both houses.
The democrats - cunning, soulless, irrational, America-hating hand-wringers, are a foregone conclusion and are far beyond any hope of redemption. When the next primaries roll around, be prepared to expend energy, time, and money to vote new republican blood into office. The likes of the RINOs are destroying our country as surely as any democrat ever has.
6 posted on
05/25/2007 12:50:08 PM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: dennisw
Of course mass immigration is being used by the political elites to undermine democratic rule and self-government.
That's been obvious for a very long time.
Less well known, the political elites have selected Mexicans to be the vanguard of the proletariat so that full anti-semitic government policies may readily be put into place AND the Orientals kept out.
We've had this garbage before ~ Juan Peron, a series of Mexican Presidents, Vargas, Castro, etc., but in different countries.
Interesting that the Senate leadership has been able to co-opt so many elderly and senile Republican senators to their cause. You'd expect those guys to have at least some memory of what has gone on in the past.
7 posted on
05/25/2007 12:50:32 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: dennisw
Wow, that was a long post. I didnt get past this line.
However, while acknowledging that they may not now receive their votes, they believed that these immigrants are more malleable than the existing American
Its time to vote these SOB's out of office.
8 posted on
05/25/2007 12:50:52 PM PDT by
chaos_5
(1-800-882-2005 Amnesty Hot-line!)
To: dennisw
Democrats wanted increased immigration because Latin American immigrants tend to vote Democrat once naturalized... and Republicans like immigration because their sponsors (businesses and churches) do. This is like two guys going to Las Vegas, the Democrat is going to Vegas to own the casino, and the mathematical certainty of winning, while the Republican is excited because he was given $1000 to spend in the casino and thinks he's going to get rich betting against that same mathematical certainty.
The Republican Party is certainly acting like the STUPID party with this illegals amnesty!
12 posted on
05/25/2007 12:55:29 PM PDT by
RJL
To: dennisw
One even called them "rednecks," and apologized to us on their behalf for their incorrect attitude on immigration. Ten to one, that's Lindsey Graham being quoted.
To: dennisw
This is a very long read, but it is quite insightful. Thanks for posting it!
18 posted on
05/25/2007 1:09:39 PM PDT by
hunter112
(Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
To: dennisw
Fascinating analysis and well worth the time to read the entire article. We really are importing the Latin American government model of patrons, patronage and dependent subjects.
21 posted on
05/25/2007 1:21:05 PM PDT by
Truth29
To: dennisw
In other words sheeple on steroids.
Great.
22 posted on
05/25/2007 1:21:15 PM PDT by
Let's Roll
(As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
To: dennisw
Well written and insightful, as has been stated above. And also a cause for absolute RAGE at how our politicians behave. This line, in particular, got me:
In that idealized "new" United States, political uncertainty, demanding constituents, difficult elections, and accountability in general would "go away" after tinkering with the People, who have given lawmakers their privileges but who, like a Sword of Damocles, can also "unfairly" take them away. Hispanics would acquiesce and assist in the "natural progress" of these legislators to remain in power and increase the scope of that power. In this sense, Republicans and Democrats were similar.
Earth to Politicians: WE AIN'T INTERESTED IN A "NEW" UNITED STATES!!!! The old one was and is just fine, thank you. In fact, my only response to that is: Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required. Yes, of course, we'll do the right thing and pressure them first, and vote against them second. But what do we do when all of that fails, when the politicos get what they want in the paragraph above?
To: dennisw
26 posted on
05/25/2007 1:38:24 PM PDT by
Yaelle
To: dennisw
Damn, this is good, and I'm only about 1/3 through. BUMP, BUMP, BUMP for later.
Good find Dennis!
28 posted on
05/25/2007 1:41:34 PM PDT by
AFreeBird
(Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
To: dennisw
Thanks for posting this. Very insightful.
To: dennisw
This was the most important line in the article to me. I think it's time:
A fourth way would be for a political entrepreneur to successfully use popular discontent with mass immigration to reach power.
30 posted on
05/25/2007 1:42:48 PM PDT by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: dennisw
To: dennisw
32 posted on
05/25/2007 1:43:56 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: dennisw
Here’s an excerpt from “Hotline on Call” that directly confirms some of the writer’s key points:
“Many anti-comp Republicans are faking their opposition to the issue and have told their corporate fundraisers and lobbyist patrons that they privately hope a bill will pass. These anti-comp Republicans have to pretend to be in the anti-amnesty camp because they’d suffer politically because of it.” Source:
http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/05/nativism_thy_na.html
33 posted on
05/25/2007 1:52:32 PM PDT by
ftro
To: dennisw
Permanent bookmark to my home page. Thanks for posting.
34 posted on
05/25/2007 2:04:38 PM PDT by
greyfoxx39
(Thanks congress and President Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson