Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Novel sugar-to-hydrogen technology promises transportation fuel independence
Virginia Tech News ^ | 5/23/06 | Susan Trulove

Posted on 05/25/2007 9:24:25 AM PDT by HangnJudge

snip. Researchers at Virginia Tech, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the University of Georgia propose using polysaccharides, or sugary carbohydrates, from biomass to directly produce low-cost hydrogen for the new hydrogen economy.

snip. Using synthetic biology approaches, Zhang and colleagues Barbara R. Evans and Jonathan R. Mielenz of ORNL, and Robert C. Hopkins and Michael W.W. Adams of the University of Georgia, are using a combination of 13 enzymes never found together in nature to completely convert polysaccharides (C6H10O5) and water into hydrogen when and where that form of energy is needed. This “synthetic enzymatic pathway” research appears in the May 23 issue of PLoS ONE, the online, open-access journal from the Public Library of Science.
snip. The vision is for the ingredients to be mixed in the fuel tank of your car, for instance. A car with an approximately 12-gallon tank could hold 27 kilograms (kg) of starch, which is the equivalent of 4 kg of hydrogen. The range would be more than 300 miles, Zhang estimates. One kg of starch will produce the same energy output as 1.12 kg (0.38 gallons) of gasoline

snip. So it is environmentally friendly, energy efficient, requires no special infrastructure, and is extremely safe. We have killed three birds with one stone,” he said. “We have hydrogen production with a mild reaction and low cost. We have hydrogen storage and transport in the form of starch or syrups. And no special infrastructure is needed

(Excerpt) Read more at vtnews.vt.edu ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; fuel; hydrogen; sugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: VeritatisSplendor; HangnJudge
So this means you drive around with some syrup in your tank, converting it to hydrogen as needed, rather than driving around with a big tank of hydrogen ready to explode? Sounds good.

Then you need another tank to convert cellulose into glucose and things will really be good - organic cars powered by termites and bacteria.

Polysaccharides like starch and cellulose are used by plants for energy storage and building blocks and are very stable until exposed to enzymes. Just add enzymes to a mixture of starch and water and “the enzymes use the energy in the starch to break up water into only carbon dioxide and hydrogen,” Zhang said.

A membrane bleeds off the carbon dioxide and the hydrogen is used by the fuel cell to create electricity. Water, a product of that fuel cell process, will be recycled for the starch-water reactor. Laboratory tests confirm that it all takes place at low temperature--about 86 degrees F--and atmospheric pressure.

. . . The research was based on Zhang’s previous work pertaining to cellulosic ethanol production and the ORNL and University of Georgia researchers’ work with enzymatic hydrogen production.


41 posted on 05/25/2007 10:24:11 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
We are arming our enemies via a disgraceful energy policy. Putting those SOBS back in tents and back on camels and making them inconsequential (save for when they do something Really Dumb (TM)) should be the new Manhattan project.

I couldnt have said it better myself, and I tried:

"I'm not a global warming nut, but I think this country needs a major initiative to eliminate our dependance on fossil fuels. A manhattan project for our generation. If we succeed, the oil money will be cut off and the arab nations will, within a generation, go back to being irrelevant." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821957/posts?page=33#33

42 posted on 05/25/2007 10:29:35 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

and there was much rejoicing from the tortilla markets!


43 posted on 05/25/2007 10:30:09 AM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

These nuts have gotta stop coming up with ways to convert food into gasoline substitutes. This is an environmentalists “feel good” approach to a non-existant problem. The only thing this accomplishes is a reduction in the food supply and an increase in the price we pay for the ingredients in our foods. If the greenies would get out of the way of progress, we could drill new wells and build new refineries and the price of fuel would go down.


44 posted on 05/25/2007 10:30:22 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Seems suitable for your renewable energy ping list. I’ll bump this for later reading.


45 posted on 05/25/2007 10:32:48 AM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MWF054

That’s why I’m curious about a comparison in terms of energy output per dollar. I’m betting that the stuff ain’t cheap; that a dollar’s worth of hydrogen from starch won’t take you anywhere near as far down the road as a dollar’s worth of gas.


46 posted on 05/25/2007 10:37:47 AM PDT by Redcloak (The 2nd Amendment isn't about sporting goods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Then you need another tank to convert cellulose into glucose and things will really be good - organic cars powered by termites and bacteria.

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:O7CsUOFC0C0J:www.siemens-foundation.org/documents/2006-07NationalWinnersReleaseFINAL_000.pdf+scott+molony+siemen&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

In their winning team project, Linking Supercomputing and Systems Biology for Efficient Bioethanol Production, Scott Molony, Steven Arcangeli and Scott Horton contribute to a growing body of research on creating microrganisms that can produce alternative fuels. “This team used supercomputers to analyze biological networks, looking at tens of thousands of genes and their biological pathways to discover clues for engineering direct biofuel production by microorganisms,” said competition judge Dr. Gary Benson, Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Department of Biology, Director of Graduate Studies Program in Bioinformatics, Boston University. “Through a real team effort and a sophisticated, interdisciplinary approach, they developed a promising method that takes us a step closer to engineering biofuel.” Based partly on the team’s work, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory received a major grant to continue this research. The team’s mentors were Dr. Nagiza Samatova, Mr. Chris Symons, Dr. Byung­Hoony Park, and Dr. Tatiana Karpinets, all with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The winning Science project with the Siemens Foundation competition was precisely on the subject, with meaningful results.

47 posted on 05/25/2007 10:38:21 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt

Have a Blizzard and think about that a bit before making a rash move.


48 posted on 05/25/2007 10:38:49 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

I’m concerned about my car becoming diabetic.....


49 posted on 05/25/2007 10:41:22 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Very promising. One question though, how does it do in sub freezing temperatures?


50 posted on 05/25/2007 10:42:52 AM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Whatever is begun in anger, ends in shame." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita
We aren’t any closer to partial, much less complete hydrogen usage than we were ten years ago,

After reading this article, I would say we are MUCH closer than we were ten years ago.

51 posted on 05/25/2007 10:44:42 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge; RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ..
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

52 posted on 05/25/2007 10:44:57 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge; SouthTexas
Works great until a kazillion ants plug the tank and fuel system
53 posted on 05/25/2007 10:49:30 AM PDT by tubebender (Large reward for person offering leads to my missing tag lines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
That’s why I’m curious about a comparison in terms of energy output per dollar. I’m betting that the stuff ain’t cheap

http://www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/table3.pdf

Current Spot prices Sugar
9.6 cts / pound - free market
21 cts / pound - USA
54 posted on 05/25/2007 10:49:55 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge
University of Georgia?

Uh oh...

If this works out, GA Tech will be hatin’ life!

55 posted on 05/25/2007 10:50:57 AM PDT by ryan71 (You can hear it on the coconut telegraph...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Don’t worry. We’ll just have the cars poop on the road.


56 posted on 05/25/2007 10:55:26 AM PDT by Tao Yin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
Very promising. One question though, how does it do in sub freezing temperatures?

Most enzymes use temperature sensitive rate dependent processes. Cold temperatures would likely slow conversion significantly.
57 posted on 05/25/2007 10:55:43 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tao Yin
Heh,heh,heh - I just thought of a good job for all those illegal immigrants that want to come work in our country...
58 posted on 05/25/2007 10:57:55 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
South Florida is a mecca for sugar.

So is Michigan where sugar is made from sugar beets.

Actually we make more sugar from beets than we do from cane.

The last figures I could find say the US produced 3.45 million tons of cane sugar and 3.75 million tons of beet sugar.

Since there is no difference between the two, when you buy a bag of sugar there is no way to tell if it came from sugar cane or sugar beets. Their chemical make-up is identical.

If you want a real olfactory treat (sarcasm) drive by a sugar processing plant - smells worse than a pig farm. You might think sugar production smells good. Believe me, it doesn't.

59 posted on 05/25/2007 10:58:24 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
If this works out, GA Tech will be hatin’ life!

Ouch!
Fortunately, Ga,. Tech has a large presence at ORNL so maybe they would be involved too.

If I could stop using oil however, even I would saw nice words about UGA (maybe 1 or 2)

60 posted on 05/25/2007 10:59:52 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson