Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Goes Nutmeg
The New York Sun ^ | May 25, 2007 | Ryan Sager

Posted on 05/24/2007 10:53:53 PM PDT by Josh Painter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last
To: kinoxi

He knows damn well what he’s doing. He’s running, but he’s doing so in a non-conventional (and CHEAP) way. He’ll declare soon.


121 posted on 05/25/2007 6:13:08 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson in 2008: It can be morning in America, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Talking to a likely Thompson staffer ahead of the speech, I said I hoped he'd get in the race and shake things up. The staffer said, coyly, "I think you'll get your wish." I didn't push for a date and time. But this guy's ready to go for it.

Woo hoo!!!!!!

122 posted on 05/25/2007 6:13:40 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson in 2008: It can be morning in America, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; Captainpaintball

CPB was taking things out of context, MSM style, I see...


123 posted on 05/25/2007 6:14:51 AM PDT by RockinRight (Fred Thompson in 2008: It can be morning in America, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

That is the coolest logo I think I've ever seen!

And yes, I'm a FredHead.

124 posted on 05/25/2007 6:21:20 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Thanks!


125 posted on 05/25/2007 6:24:32 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: facedown
How about this logo

A vote for FRED will keep the Democrats from dropping you dead

126 posted on 05/25/2007 6:33:04 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

Thompson / Hunter [reality pick] or Bauer (Jack) / Bolton (John) [fantasy pick] in ‘08 -— they get it


127 posted on 05/25/2007 6:34:26 AM PDT by NordP (The greatest gift God can give us is LIFE. The greatest gift man can give to another is FREEDOM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
The guy has not stated he’s running.

That doesn't mean he's indecisive. Your logic is precipitously (in the "headlong without forethought" sense) anti-Fred.

What we think about whether he'll run is immaterial wrt his degree of decisiveness.

The problem with your logic is that you assert that if we don't know he's running, then he is indecisive. That's obviously bogus.

If I have misunderstood, please accept apologies and correct me.

128 posted on 05/25/2007 6:35:23 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: familyop

At least a few Orange County people probably know about his immigration record regarding cheap, third-world labor. And they know what miseries their own past lobbying for the same has caused in their part of California. There aren’t as many big _L_ Libertarians (open borders Platform) there now as in the past.


Maybe instead of being the tiresome turd in every punchbowl (Fred thread) you could just write that you think your lovable but unkown Duncan Hunter is better on immigration, and leave it at that.


129 posted on 05/25/2007 6:49:08 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney (...and another "Constitution-bot"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
"They don't get it that putting it on a piece of paper anymore, even passing it into law, does not convince the American people that they will do what they say they're going to do," Mr. Thompson thundered.

That certainly sounds like Fred gets it. I'm starting to like this guy.

Our worthless legislators need to understand that we just don't believe them anymore. The only thing that will satisfy me (and I think most conservatives) is small steps that can be easily verified before taking the next step. Comprehensive is a code word for a bureaucratic nightmare with no accountability and no verifiable results.

130 posted on 05/25/2007 6:53:11 AM PDT by 6ppc (Call Photo Reuters, that's the name, and away goes truth right down the drain. Photo Reuters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; Captainpaintball
captainpaintball said that Fred said: "The immigration problem is about immigration." was one of his quotes, more or less.

Fred actually said: The government could start by securing our nation's borders. A sovereign nation that can't do that is not a sovereign nation. This is secondarily an immigration issue. It's primarily a national security issue. We were told twenty years ago if we produced a comprehensive solution, we'd solve the illegal immigration problem. Twelve million illegals later, we're being told that same thing again. I don't believe most Americans are as concerned about the 12 million that are here as they are about the next 12 million and the next 12 million after that. I think they're thinking: "Prove you can secure the border and then people of good will can sit down and work out the rest of it, while protecting those folks who play by the rules."

You are absolutely correct Jellybean, above is what Fred actually said about immigration. Doesn't look anything like what captainpaintball quoted.

131 posted on 05/25/2007 6:57:06 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

I know waiting can be frustrating.
Try to be patient, though.


132 posted on 05/25/2007 7:25:54 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: metesky

Really?

That’s GOOD news.

Thank you!


133 posted on 05/25/2007 7:26:50 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

Reading and hearing the ENTIRE sentence in context I got the impression that Fred was saying that there is a lot more to immigration then just immigration. There is national security at stake. It’s strange to find FReepers here that disagree with and disparage that remark regardless of who you support.


134 posted on 05/25/2007 7:27:16 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
re: Fred Thompson Goes Nutmeg

Well, the Dems and the Rinos went 'saffron' a long time ago... /grin

135 posted on 05/25/2007 7:38:14 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger; jellybean; Politicalmom; SE Mom
It's the last paragraph or sentence in the piece that has the gnutty gnats in a tizzy, stamping their tiny feet with feigned impatience and imitating lamestream media tactics by purposefully misquoting, usurping context of Fred comments.

IOW, they're scared outta their ever-livin' minds, LOL!

136 posted on 05/25/2007 7:45:13 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (PUT AMERICA AHEAD --- VOTE FOR FRED!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
They've gone to plaid!


137 posted on 05/25/2007 7:46:03 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
All I know about the guy is that he doesn’t know whether he’s running.

Not declaring openly is a different animal entirely from not knowing whether you're running. Did you ever consider that there are strategic and tactical reasons why he may not wish to officially declare yet?

The man has filmed shows and a movie that cannot - CANNOT - be aired if he's a presidential candidate, without the same networks giving equal free time to all of the other candidates. That he's giving consideration to those who hired him, and who staked money on the ability to air those programs, says a lot positive about him. Further, he's also getting a lot of free publicity by subbing for Paul Harvey and for speaking on/writing for ABC. He'd be stupid to give that up. Also, he's letting the other Republican candidates hang themselves in their contradictions. Finally, I've heard that he wants to declare after 6/30, so as to start the 3rd quarter fresh (from the standpoint of campaign fundraising) - it'd look bad if he filed a 2Q report showing 1/3 or 1/2 of the fundraising shown by the others.

Again, these are tactical and strategic reasons for not declaring, not any kind of indeceisiveness about his ultimate candidacy.

138 posted on 05/25/2007 7:55:39 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

It’s like saying when a college basketball sophomore doesn’t declare he’s entering the NBA draft in the middle of his NCAA season, he’s being indecisive. He has strategic reasons for not declaring. He has legal reasons for not declaring.


139 posted on 05/25/2007 8:08:25 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
The guy has not stated he’s running. Bullshit has been abound for months but the man himself has not announced it.

He doesn't need to announce. The longer he goes without announcing the smaller the amount of money he needs to raise.

Right now he gets publicity for free. If he announces, he joins the scrum and will need to start spending money.

His current strategy is pretty smart. He could hold off announcing until September if he wanted to. By then He could be up to 30%+ with people crying for him to announce and still not have spent a dollar of campaign funds.

140 posted on 05/25/2007 8:13:43 AM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson