1 posted on
05/24/2007 8:39:14 PM PDT by
lowbridge
To: al baby; Allegra; Auntbee; BJClinton; Dashing Dasher; dfwddr; exile; feinswinesuksass; ...
2 posted on
05/24/2007 8:41:29 PM PDT by
EveningStar
(http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/)
To: lowbridge
You’d think they would at least consider it littering.
3 posted on
05/24/2007 8:42:06 PM PDT by
kinoxi
To: lowbridge
So is there a lawfull use?
4 posted on
05/24/2007 8:42:20 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: lowbridge
But they argued that Ensz was making a statement protected by free speech... Does this mean we can take a perch in the gallery and defecate on Congress?
To: lowbridge
This means I was wrongly judged on all those pranks we pulled as kids leaving poop on peoples doorsteps. I was only making a statement protected by free speech.
To: lowbridge; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; EternalVigilance; AuH2ORepublican; Clemenza; ...
You know full well if this had been a Republican activist doing this to a Democrat member it would be prosecuted as a hate crime.
7 posted on
05/24/2007 8:45:17 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
To: lowbridge
There was another recent case where a man sent dog poop in the envelope with his payment for a parking ticket and was charged for the offense.
Dems walk. There are no politically motivated hate crimes. < /s >
8 posted on
05/24/2007 8:45:58 PM PDT by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: lowbridge
But they argued that Ensz was making a statement protected by free speech - the poop was a symbol of what she thought of Musgrave's politics...Just about every statement 'rats make amounts to little more than poop, IMO......
To: lowbridge
Rosie O’Donnell shovels the stuff out onto the American public daily, but nobody’s charging her....
To: lowbridge
“But they argued that Ensz was making a statement protected by free speech”
BS. Horsesh!t. Etc.
Ain’t buying it. That is like saying it is free speech to throw a brick through GOP office windows (which ALSO happened in 2004).
11 posted on
05/24/2007 8:47:56 PM PDT by
weegee
(Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
To: lowbridge
14 posted on
05/24/2007 8:52:16 PM PDT by
Tamar1973
(Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/)!)
To: lowbridge; PGalt
I was grabbing a few things from my favorite Home Depot location today for this weekend, and there were several products featuring 'worm poop.'
My first thought was my socialist senators and gubner have just earned a sample as a gift, but then realized they're too stupid to know what to do with it.
And the local politicos aren't smart enough to learn how to make money in MI.
And so it goes in the rust belt.
17 posted on
05/24/2007 8:59:42 PM PDT by
quantim
(2008 => I'll take an imperfect winner over a perfect loser.)
To: lowbridge
19 posted on
05/24/2007 9:04:17 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
To: lowbridge
I just had to click on this because of the title of the thread - Woman acquitted of illegal poop use!
I sort of did the same thing when someone kept stealing my paper from my front porch, putting cat poop inside an old paper and leaving it out - no one ever stole my paper again. Good to know if I was caught I was just exercising my right of free speech and I’d have been acquitted!
20 posted on
05/24/2007 9:04:18 PM PDT by
Theresawithanh
(You are my tagline, my only tagline, you make me happy when skies are gray...)
To: lowbridge
This is permitted as “free speech”, but we are silenced 90 days before elections?
Remember the couple (in Chicago, I believe) that Clinton had taken into custody because they gave him the finger? Maybe they should have tossed turds at him instead.
What alternate dimension are we living in?
22 posted on
05/24/2007 9:06:09 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: lowbridge
"But they argued that Ensz was making a statement protected by free speech - the poop was a symbol of what she thought of Musgrave's politics."
That's too rich!....DNC - The Sh!t~for~brains party!
23 posted on
05/24/2007 9:10:15 PM PDT by
rockrr
(09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0)
To: lowbridge
Feces is the appropriate symbol for Democrat's level of political discourse.
Leaving crap on a doorstep was probably the most eloquent, reasoned thing this woman has ever said.
To: lowbridge
Truly, I can think of no more legal use for said substance.
Now if it were HERBIVORE poo, then, it should be illegal, cause that is useful stuff.
28 posted on
05/25/2007 9:34:02 AM PDT by
Finger Monkey
(H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
To: lowbridge
Can someone drop a bag of turds on Kathleen Ensz’s stoop please?
31 posted on
06/16/2007 3:45:46 AM PDT by
paltz
To: lowbridge
Ensz was making a statement protected by free speech - the poop was a symbol of what she thought This is great. So now Democrat's speech is by law what we always said it was, dog mess.
32 posted on
06/16/2007 3:49:15 AM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson