Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badeye
Jefferson Davis wrote as much, and Lee stated numerous times his view was much the same, except he qualified it with the realization concerning ‘their current state of development’ which I took to mean education.

I'm not aware of any quotes by Davis indicating that. And Lee's opposition to slavery was mild at best, but he was still prepared to see it go on for decades if not centuries if that was what he believed God's will was.

In the last ten months of the war, the South seriously discussed arming slaves with the promise they’d be free men after hostilities ended. They never did it, but the fact it was discussed repeatedly in their Congress is recorded fact.

Arming slaves had been proposed several times during the war and had idea had always been met with horror. It's telling to note that even at the end in March 1865 when the confederate congress finally bit the bullet and agreed to enlist free blacks and slaves as combat soliders the legislation authorizing it specifically refused to free slaves that served.

282 posted on 05/24/2007 8:29:22 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

‘I’m not aware of any quotes by Davis indicating that.’

I’m currently rereading Foote’s masterpiece ‘narrative’. I’ll try to remember to look it up and give you the time frame and circumstances.


297 posted on 05/24/2007 8:36:11 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
June 8th-10th is the reenactment of Port Republic
298 posted on 05/24/2007 8:36:16 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade (For True Conservative Leadership Vote For Duncan Hunter/Newt Gingrich 08!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

“It’s telling to note that even at the end in March 1865 when the confederate congress finally bit the bullet and agreed to enlist free blacks and slaves as combat soliders the legislation authorizing it specifically refused to free slaves that served.”

Yes. It tells us that the Confederate government did not want to exceed its power by giving away property that did not belong to them.

Good catch.


301 posted on 05/24/2007 8:38:02 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson