Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does It Mean "The South Shall Rise Again":
The Wichita (KS) Eagle ^ | 23 May 2007 | Mark McCormick

Posted on 05/24/2007 6:03:30 AM PDT by Rebeleye

...he was stunned to see two large Confederate flags flying from trucks...emblazoned with the words "The South Shall Rise Again." I'm stunned, too, that people still think it is cool to fly this flag. Our society should bury these flags -- not flaunt them...because the Confederate flag symbolizes racial tyranny to so many... ...This flag doesn't belong on city streets, in videos or in the middle of civil discussion. It belongs in our past -- in museums and in history books -- along with the ideas it represents.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansas.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: battleflag; cbf; confederacy; confederate; confederatecrumbs; crossofsaintandrew; damnmossbacks; damnyankee; democratsareracists; dixie; dixiedems; flag; kansas; mouthyfolks; nomanners; northernaggression; rednecks; saintandrewscross; scumbaglawyer; southernwhine; southronaggression; southwillloseagain; southwillriseagain; thesouth; trailertrash; trashtalk; williteverend; wishfulthinking; yankeeaggression; yankeebastards; yankeescum; yeahsure
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,541-1,557 next last
To: Badeye
Such a long reply, yet you failed to answer my principle question. Perhaps you missed it, in that case I shall repeat it. Other than the threat of abolition how was the federal goverment trampling the rights of the southern states? Of the war was not about slavery why were all the Northern states free states and yet the southern states slave states?
421 posted on 05/24/2007 11:17:44 AM PDT by WhiteSox1837
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Yeah, silly me. I guess I should give up and do nothing.


422 posted on 05/24/2007 11:18:30 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Once again I am reduced to explaining the simplest things.

“The confederate government had no problems with levying slave labor without compensation ‘for the war effort’.”

Big difference between borrowing and giving away.

“They had no problem taking property that didn’t belong to them by placing quotas on agricultural produce or reserving cargo space on private packet ships, again ‘for the war effort’.”

Hmmmm. . . similar tactics used by the U.S. during WWI, WWII, etc. Suppose the U.S. government was wrong there.

“That, apparently, isn’t exceeding their powers. Or if it was they didn’t care.” Same as above.

“But you would have us believe they had constitutional qualms about freeing slaves that fought for them against the Union?”

I just follow the facts and logic. You believe whatever you want.


423 posted on 05/24/2007 11:18:56 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
“This makes no sense at all ...”

The tariff on imported cotton finished goods raised the price of such goods to all domestic consumers, lowering the quantity demanded below what it would have been otherwise. If the demand for a finished (or “final”) good falls, the demand for the specialized inputs - in this case, raw cotton - used to produce that finished good falls as well.

The sense of injustice expressed by Southern politicians of that era reflected the fact that Southern suppliers of raw materials participated in competitive world markets, while Southern demanders of imported manufactured goods faced artificially high prices because of the tariffs enacted, in part, to protect Northern industries.

424 posted on 05/24/2007 11:20:15 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: WhiteSox1837

Alas, my ‘long reply’ contains the answer, and you fail to understand it.

No problem, I run into it with anyone North of the Ohio River that hasn’t studied the era.


425 posted on 05/24/2007 11:20:26 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610

Moral Christians don’t go about murdering people. Same goes for Quantrill and his ilk.


426 posted on 05/24/2007 11:20:33 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

Exactly.


427 posted on 05/24/2007 11:21:29 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas

“The South Shall Rise Again”
To this Yankee, it means that Democrat redneck white trash want to go back to the good old days of segregation, lynching, and enslavement of black people.

Amen to that


428 posted on 05/24/2007 11:21:44 AM PDT by CAPTAINSUPERMARVELMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
He just believed slavery was an abomination and used pretty extreme tactics to see it abolished.

Those "pretty extreme tactics" included being a serial killer. John Brown is to be condemned, not celebrated.

429 posted on 05/24/2007 11:29:34 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: mjolnir

Thank you very much for that correction.


430 posted on 05/24/2007 11:30:41 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Its been said the Civil War was bracketed by two madmen. John Brown and John Wilkes Booth.

And a whole lot of crazies in between.

431 posted on 05/24/2007 11:31:58 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies]

To: 66-442hot

Brings back some great memories...my Dad owned one of the late 442s and it went like a scalded dog!


432 posted on 05/24/2007 11:32:32 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
You said:

“By the third year of the war, those troops, especially those in the Army of Northern Virginia, were not fighting for slavery, far from it. By that point, nobody was thinking much about ‘The Cause’ at all, they were fighting for their brothers - literally, and their neighbors - again literally, because of the unusual nature of the war itself.”

I understand your point that by the end of the war a few conferdate soldiers may have thought they were fighting for their brothers, But what other reason than slavery did the south cecede for?

433 posted on 05/24/2007 11:33:56 AM PDT by WhiteSox1837
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Its been said the Civil War was bracketed by two madmen. John Brown and John Wilkes Booth.”

“And a whole lot of crazies in between.”

No denying it. Jackson convinced pepper made his ‘left leg weak’ is one of my favorite examples. Ewell and AP Hill also had some ‘curious’ tendencies.


434 posted on 05/24/2007 11:34:02 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

That’s why my parents moved from Maine to Charlotte.


435 posted on 05/24/2007 11:34:12 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

LOL no, I think over time “they” gradually figure out which sites they shouldn’t allow.

About the same time, or maybe a bit sooner this year, they banned YouTube, so now when people post YT films, I can’t view them at work.


436 posted on 05/24/2007 11:34:35 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: CAPTAINSUPERMARVELMAN

Yep, the north has integrated so very well. Boston, Chicago, Philly, are all bastions of integration. No segregated areas at all in the northern cities and racial harmony truly prevails. Get off your high horse.


437 posted on 05/24/2007 11:35:13 AM PDT by bfree (liberalism is the enemy of freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: WhiteSox1837

‘But what other reason than slavery did the south cecede for?’

Virginia left the Union primarily because ‘she’ knew the war would be fought there, in large part. It was questionable if Virginia would vote to follow the first five states right up til the moment Lincoln called for an army of 75,000 troops to ‘quash the rebellion’. The only way that army could have done so was by marching through Virginia.

Just one example that comes to mind.

As you might know, there was always a very real tension between the States Rights crowd, and the Strong Central Government types. It began festering about ten minutes after Cornwallis surrendered in the Revolutionary War, from what you read of the era. And its still going on today, as we see ‘unfunded mandates’ from DC forced upon various states, for varying reasons.


438 posted on 05/24/2007 11:39:20 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861; Non-Sequitur

I find it interesting how many Southerners see Sherman as a terrorist and Quantrill as a hero.


439 posted on 05/24/2007 11:39:49 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Once again I am reduced to explaining the simplest things.

You can try.

Big difference between borrowing and giving away.

It wasn't borrowed. It was labor required to be produced on demand. Without compensation to the owner

Hmmmm. . . similar tactics used by the U.S. during WWI, WWII, etc. Suppose the U.S. government was wrong there.

Hmmmm. Hardly. The difference was that the produce was paid for and the private ship owners were compensated for carrying the cargo during WWII. The confederacy demanded the space without compensation and took the crops.

I just follow the facts and logic. You believe whatever you want.

As will you.

440 posted on 05/24/2007 11:40:06 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 1,541-1,557 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson