Posted on 05/22/2007 5:44:40 AM PDT by Baladas
A federal judge said yesterday that the city of San Diego must pay more than $900,000 in legal fees to the attorney for Philip Paulson, the atheist who sued over the presence of the Mount Soledad cross on city land. U.S. District Judge Gordon Thompson Jr. ordered that the city pay lawyer James McElroy $962,673.28 for his work on the case over the past four years.
Thompson is the same judge who ruled in 1991 that the cross on city land violated the state constitution's ban on government preference for religions – a ruling that touched off an epic legal battle that continues today.
City Attorney Michael Aguirre immediately said Thompson's ruling would be appealed.
(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...
Say what? This judge needs to be taken to the woodshed.
This idiotic policy has been what has funded the ACLU lawsuits for years. Too bad the GOP did NOTHING when they had control and had a chance to fix this stupidity. There is no chance a Dem Congress will do anything on this.
I thought that the loser had to, at the very least, pay his own legal fees. Loser Pays, across the board, would be a good move.
Pay $1M?..........I’d be VERY CROSS!............
I imagine that since this judges order was stayed already, his order to pay the fees can be to. I guess the prior case is moot since the land was transferred, but I assume it needs to be heard so that the issue can be resolved. Only then should this guy get paid if he prevails. I can’t see a court upholding this when he didn’t win and the issue has not actually been resolved in court.
Actually one GOP Congressman did try last year (or maybe 18 mo's now). Can't recall his name but he introduced a Bill to end ACLU payments in 1st Amendment - civil rights - cases like this one. But it went nowhere.
I seem to recall his fellow GOP congress critters killed it. Sent it off to 'committee', never to be seen or heard of again.
Initiate the recall petitions for this dangerous judge!
Education:
University of Southern California, B.S., 1951
What’s the B.S. stand for ???
Technically, he did not lose. He won (but has since died) to have the cross removed and it was order to be removed. The Supreme Court put a stay on the ruling. That gave time for the federal government to come in and take control of the land and made the ruling moot. So he never really lost (except for in life).
He couldn't get it out of committee. That's a bunch of BS. The GOP had control, they should have gotten it done.
and hopefully in after-life. May he be roasting right now.
Congress empowered judges to give these awards. This is not all the judge's fault, the GOP congress which did not fix this has to carry some of the 'credit'.
What exactly are the criteria for being appointed to a federal judicial seat? Here’s a guy who does three years in a junior role in the attorney general’s office, then goes into private practice for 10 years. What qualified him for this appointment? What did he do in his practice that distinguished him from other potential candidates?
The Bum Lost = No Money.
Also stop paying the “JUDGE” with taxpayer money.
You bet it's BS. For some reason the GOP worked with the RATS on this. Maybe they were afraid of backlash from minorities for whom this ACLU paymnet baloney was originaaly aimed to help.
But yes, BS none the less.
I have heard of loser pays.
Why in this case does the winner have to pay?
Course, it is the taxpayers so that, is ok.
Peters said he wants a briefing from Aguirre on the city's basis for appealing, and that he might decide it's “better to just put an end to it,” by paying McElroy, rather than again taking the case to a higher court.
Interesting article and tactics. Thanks for posting.
Congressman Billybob
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.