Posted on 05/19/2007 9:32:08 PM PDT by Maelstorm
As if a light were switched off, the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, portrayed for 20 years as a progressive modern ruler by Islamic standards, was suddenly, in 1977-1978, turned into this foaming at the mouth monster by the international left media. Soon after becoming President in 1977, Jimmy Carter launched a deliberate campaign to undermine the Shah. The Soviets and their left-wing apparatchiks would coordinate with Carter by smearing the Shah in a campaign of lies meant to topple his throne. The result would be the establishment of a Marxist/Islamic state in Iran headed by the tyrannical Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The Iranian revolution, besides enthroning one of the world's most oppressive regimes, would greatly contribute to the creation of the Marxist/Islamic terror network challenging the free world today.
At the time, a senior Iranian diplomat in Washington observed, "President Carter betrayed the Shah and helped create the vacuum that will soon be filled by Soviet-trained agents and religious fanatics who hate America." Under the guise of promoting" human rights," Carter made demands on the Shah while blackmailing him with the threat that if the demands weren't fulfilled, vital military aid and training would be withheld. This strange policy, carried out against a staunch, 20 year Middle East ally, was a repeat of similar policies applied in the past by US governments to other allies such as pre Mao China and pre Castro Cuba.
Carter started by pressuring the Shah to release "political prisoners" including known terrorists and to put an end to military tribunals. The newly released terrorists would be tried under civil jurisdiction with the Marxist/Islamists using these trials as a platform for agitation and propaganda. This is a standard tactic of the left then and now. The free world operates at a distinct dis-advantage to Marxist and Islamic nations in this regard as in those countries, trials are staged to "show" the political faith of the ruling elite. Fair trials, an independent judiciary, and a search for justice is considered to be a western bourgeois prejudice.
Carter pressured Iran to allow for "free assembly" which meant that groups would be able to meet and agitate for the overthrow of the government. It goes without saying that such rights didn't exist in any Marxist or Islamic nation. The planned and predictable result of these policies was an escalation of opposition to the Shah, which would be viewed by his enemies as a weakness. A well-situated internal apparatus in Iran receiving its marching orders from the Kremlin egged on this growing opposition.
By the fall of 1977, university students, working in tandem with a Shi'ite clergy that had long opposed the Shah's modernizing policies, began a well coordinated and financed series of street demonstrations supported by a media campaign reminiscent of the 1947-1948 campaign against China's Chiang Ki Shek in favor of the "agrarian reformer" Mao tse Tung. At this point the Shah was unable to check the demonstrators, who were instigating violence as a means of inflaming the situation and providing their media stooges with atrocity propaganda. Rumors were circulating amongst Iranians that the CIA under the orders of President Carter organized these demonstrations.
In November 1977, the Shah and his Empress, Farah Diba, visited the White House where they were met with hostility. They were greeted by nearly 4,000 Marxist-led Iranian students, many wearing masks, waving clubs, and carrying banners festooned with the names of Iranian terrorist organizations. The rioters were allowed within 100 feet of the White House where they attacked other Iranians and Americans gathered to welcome the Shah. Only 15 were arrested and quickly released. Inside the White House, Carter pressured the Shah to implement even more radical changes. Meanwhile, the Soviets were mobilizing a campaign of propaganda, espionage, sabotage, and terror in Iran. The Shah was being squeezed on two sides.
In April 1978, Moscow would instigate a bloody coup in Afghanistan and install the communist puppet Nur Mohammad Taraki. Taraki would proceed to call for a "jihad" against the "Ikhwanu Shayateen" which translates into "brothers of devils," a label applied to opponents of the new red regime in Kabul and to the Iranian government. Subversives and Soviet-trained agents swarmed across the long Afghanistan/Iran border to infiltrate Shi'ite mosques and other Iranian institutions. By November 1978, there was an estimated 500,000 Soviet backed Afghanis in Iran where, among other activities, they set up training camps for terrorists.
Khomeini, a 78-year-old Shi'ite cleric whose brother had been imprisoned as a result of activities relating to his Iranian Communist party affiliations, and who had spent 15 years in exile in Ba'th Socialist Iraq, was poised to return. In exile, Khomeini spoke of the creation of a revolutionary Islamic republic, which would be anti-Western, socialist, and with total power in the hands of an ayatollah. In his efforts to violently overthrow the government of Iran, Khomeini received the full support of the Soviets.
Nureddin Klanuri, head of the Iranian Communist Tudeh Party, in exile in East Berlin, stated, "The Tudeh Party approves Ayatollah Khomeini's initiative in creating the Islamic Revolutionary Council. The ayatollah's program coincides with that of the Tudeh Party." Khomeini's closest advisor, Sadegh Ghothzadeh, was well known as a revolutionary with close links to communist intelligence. In January 1998, Pravda, the official Soviet organ, officially endorsed the Khomeini revolution.
American leaders were also supporting Khomeini. After the Pravda endorsement, Ramsey Clark, who served as Attorney General under President Lyndon B. Johnson, held a press conference where he reported on a trip to Iran and a Paris visit with Khomeini. He urged the US government to take no action to help the Shah so that Iran "could determine it's own fate." Clark played a behind the scenes role influencing members of Congress to not get involved in the crisis. Perhaps UN Ambassador Andrew Young best expressed the thinking of the left at the time when he stated that, if successful, Khomeini would "eventually be hailed as a saint."
Khomeini was allowed to seize power in Iran and, as a result, we are now reaping the harvest of anti-American fanaticism and extremism. Khomeini unleashed the hybrid of Islam and Marxism that has spawned suicide bombers and hijackers. President Jimmy Carter, and the extremists in his administration are to blame and should be held accountable.
"
Any one for some peanuts?
Pretty much says it like it is.
Just Wow.
Talk about revisionist history. The Shah was always reviled by the left for overthrowing Mossadegh, the Shah was the CIA’s man from the get go.
Years ago I read that known Russian spies were identified among the so called “students” protesting in Iran against the Shah.
.
yes, yes, yes!
our current problems with iran owe to jimmy.
I certainly wouldn’t be surprised. Sometimes I can not figure whether the left is just gullible or purposely working for the downfall of the United States. I fear it is the later. What is horrible is that a Rasmussen poll found that over 60% of them are open to the idea that the US was responsible for the 9-11 attack.
Possibly history will show him to have been an agent of the soviet union or another communist country. Just about the same time they prove Clinton was also an agent of the soviet union.
Whether by design or accident it does seem that Peanut man was the real Manchurian Candidate.
I remember this era well. I also remember that the USA stood by and let them confiscate the oil fields that had been developed by American Companies.
Carter was not only the most incompetent president of the 20th century but he’s achieved the distinction of being the worst former president. He even wins over Bubba.
With his recent book he can add to his resume “anti-Semite.”
He’s also partly to blame for the present Iranian crisis. When our citizens were held hostage in Tehran for over a year and Carter did nothing it sent a message to the Islamofascists: America is a paper tiger. Don’t think they forgot that American humiliation and our failure to respond to terrorism.
When you look at their actions I would say they are out for the downfall of this country. Look at the leadership in the Democratic Party. Everything they do is for themselves and they will do anything they can to undermine the President. That’s why Pelosi goes to Syria and Reid has us surrendering in Iraq. Pelosi, Reid, Murtha etc display the traits that would have made them Quislings in WWII. Their sympathies lie with the enemy and not with the country they claim to serve.
What happened was an ACT OF WAR by Iran against the United States. The spineless weasel also known as President Carter should have hit Iranian military installations with tactical nukes. He should have then announced that the American Embassy in the middle of Tehran would be ground zero for the largest nuke we have in our arsenal, unless our people were released unharmed in 24 hours.
bookmark for later.
Mr. Carter has sold everyone in this nation out as well. Even the ones who don’t know it.
That is what the Russians did and it worked.
Enjoyed a wonderful Armed Forces Day Parade today here. Right across the street from my seat were 5 or 6 of the local 5th column/peaceniks. Or as I like to call them “commie bedwetters”.
Ran into one of them at a teashop later. I guess they thought that since I had wandered into one or their covens I must seek “enlightenment” about 1)the true true nature of the Ayatollas and 2)the true nature of Christianity.
According to them the Ayatollas are just as much (0r more) a friend to the US as the Shah and they prove that mooslimbs are really nice guys (because the Shah was a nice guy). And as for that Christianity thing, well Jesus was really a muslim etc.
These people are bat sh*t crazy! And they love Jimmy Carter! And they love all those peaceful loving muslims who only do those wicked things because the US makes them.
God help us!
It seems that no matter how much oil we give up or land fairly won we cede that we still are fighting only for oil and only for empire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.