Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Zealand Weatherman on Global Warming: 'It's All Going to be a Joke in 5 Years'
NewBusters ^

Posted on 05/18/2007 12:20:32 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: Tokra
If you haven't already watched it - you need to view the BBC's "The Great Global Warming Swindle". They prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that increases in CO2 follow warming trends - not precede them.

See point #5 in my profile; note link #11 in references.

121 posted on 05/18/2007 9:42:11 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The article was extremely erroneous.

I know you are a beliver in AGW. I am sure the Soros backed hacks at realClimate has spun another fantastic tale. They always repudiate anything that would indicate "natural" causes, but they ALWAYS support anything says it is AGW.

We will never come together on this issue. I respect your beliefs and appreciate your passion. You add to the discussion.

The only thing I know is that the solutions of Gore, et all will destroy our way of life, and KILL millions in the third world. I believe in my heart in the capacity of free humans to adapt and not be afraid of what changes lie ahead. Gore, et al have the irrational obsession with wanting to do something NOW. I believe the reason is that they know as the years pass, this fraud they are trying to perpetuate will unravel big time. Thank you and have a good night.

122 posted on 05/18/2007 9:57:30 PM PDT by sand88 (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping.


123 posted on 05/19/2007 1:47:55 AM PDT by GOPJ ( When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals."- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
In a previous post you said the oceans were releasing CO2 due to warming? Which is it?

Both are true. The question is what is the net effect? The answer is that it can't be measured because of extreme uncertainties in our knowledge of the ocean conveyer and local effects.

124 posted on 05/19/2007 5:26:49 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
But there is clear data regarding humans as the source of CO2. The rate of change is unprecedented in the ice core record.

The ice core record can't show changes like the current spike in CO2 because, apart from the last 10-20k years, it lacks the resolution to show anything other than many decades or even centuries averaged into single readings.

125 posted on 05/19/2007 5:29:32 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
We are pumping CO2 into the atmosphere, it's not a big piece of the total greenhouse gas effect. But it's not a 3.2% increase in CO2 as stated in the article.

The article is poorly worded. The 18% or so increase that you pointed out (BTW, I agree it probably mostly manmade) turns into a 3.2% increase in greenhouse warming because the relationship from CO2 concentration to warming is logarithmic.

126 posted on 05/19/2007 5:31:53 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
heck, I remember the New Ice Age of the 1970s, Nuclear Winter in the 1980s, and the Ozone Holes of the 1990s.

Hey! There are going to be big bucks in being in the front of the wave of the next panic. Maybe we could cash in!

127 posted on 05/19/2007 5:35:11 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zavvone
Why are so many people willing to believe this global warming crap when it comes out of the mouths of celebrities!!

Because they don't understand that .045% is actually .00045, or 45/100,000. They lose it in the math.

128 posted on 05/19/2007 5:37:09 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Global cooling here we come!

Good! Now we can BLAME the nitwits...

129 posted on 05/19/2007 5:39:36 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
The rate of change is unprecedented in the ice core record.

Please cite a source. I would like to review that data. Thank you.

130 posted on 05/19/2007 5:44:44 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
"The real potential problem is the small warming caused by CO2..."

Actually, that's the part that they are lying to everyone about. The warming is not the result of an increase in CO2. It is exactly the opposite. The rise in CO2 preceeds the rise in temperature. The rise in CO2 is the result of the rise in temperature.

I wish I could remember the name of the scientist I heard on the radio explaining this, but when he was asked what was the one most important thing people needed to know about all the hysteria about man-made global warming, that was what he pointed out: the rise in temperature comes first, then the rise in CO2 as a result of that.

131 posted on 05/19/2007 6:11:05 AM PDT by Pablo64 (Ask me about my alpacas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Crazy Jim

Thanks for the link to an outstanding lecture!


132 posted on 05/19/2007 6:41:03 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

20 years ago my science teacher told our class the world would be fresh out of oil in 5-10 years...


133 posted on 05/19/2007 9:43:35 AM PDT by Mmmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Good! Now we can BLAME the nitwits...


IN a larger sense many of them are nitwits but in a specifically strategizing sense their leadership is infested with dangerous anti capitalists who want to blame every negative event, be it an iceberg melting or a ghetto kid commiting a crime, on the economic system that has created such wealth for the common man around the world.


134 posted on 05/19/2007 10:50:51 AM PDT by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Crazy Jim

Thanks for the link to “Aliens Cause Global Warming.” I printed the article and plan on sharing it with others I’ve been talking to about the false science used to prove global warming.

Crichton is simply the best at conveying scientific information in a manner that non-intellectuals can understand.


135 posted on 05/19/2007 11:40:38 AM PDT by Sweet Hour of Prayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
You do realize peer review continues after publication.

I'd go so far as to say it mostly starts at publication.

Review committees are there to keep the journals from embarasing themselves. They are not the complete process which is open to outsiders that can make a coherent case.

The 'Hockey Stick' is a perfect example, but don't ask the MSM about it.

136 posted on 05/19/2007 12:02:04 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

‘It’s All Going to be a Joke in 5 Years’”

Yep and the joke will be “how could we have been so wrong.We’re going into another ice age,the earth is freezing, we’re all going to die,aasaaaaaiiiiiiiyyyyyiiiii


137 posted on 05/19/2007 12:15:01 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Please cite a source. I would like to review that data. Thank you.

A quick google search for "CO2 historic rate of change" returns many hits. The first of which is at:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/05/co2_ice_cores/

Not a primary source. But it should get you started.

To Quote:

Until very recently, the fastest rate of change was an increase of 30 parts per million over a thousand years. We have seen the same increase, 30ppm, in the last 17 years.

138 posted on 05/19/2007 12:21:54 PM PDT by Dinsdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



139 posted on 05/19/2007 12:28:19 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
You folks on this thread aren't paying attention to the truth. I just went to the mailbox and picked up my latest issue of Cat Fancy. They say that man made Global Warming is real, and me and my cat are to blame. It's time for you folks to get in line and pay attention!


140 posted on 05/19/2007 1:48:31 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson