Skip to comments.
Prince Harry banned from clubbing
THN ^
| May 18 2007
Posted on 05/18/2007 1:55:30 AM PDT by ASC2006
Prince Harry, who was stopped from travelling to Iraq this week because of security fears, has now bee banned from visiting his favourite London nightclubs. Harry was supposed to fly out to fight with Army squadron this week, but that was vetoed at the top level by Army officials. Now the young Prince has been told to 'lie low' while his Army unit are away.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehollywoodnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
1
posted on
05/18/2007 1:55:31 AM PDT
by
ASC2006
To: ASC2006
I never figured out why they announced it in the first place. They should have deployed him to Iraq, and moved him out with his unit and then announced that he had served a year there.
2
posted on
05/18/2007 2:01:52 AM PDT
by
Zhang Fei
To: Zhang Fei
because in today’s world everyone has to shoot their mouth off about everything , and most especially the press.
I’m beginning to have certain misgivings about
parts of the 1st Amendment
To: LeoWindhorse
Just reinstate the Sedition Act and most of the MSM and Hollyweird would collapse...
4
posted on
05/18/2007 2:14:28 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. - Hillary)
To: LeoWindhorse
It was inexcusable that a civil servant told the press what kind of vehicle Harry’s unit used.
The press are what they are and expecting them to keep their mouths shut is hopeless. I would hope that the civil service might be a little more aware of what is appropriate information to disclose.
To: ASC2006
"...while his Army unit are away"????? Good grief, whatever happened to the Queen's English?
6
posted on
05/18/2007 2:29:15 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: Past Your Eyes
whatever happened to the Queen's English? She's keeping it to herself these days.
7
posted on
05/18/2007 2:41:56 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: ASC2006
"Harry totally accepts how bad it would look for him to be out enjoying himself while others risk their lives..."Last I heard Harry wanted to risk his life along with those 'others'.
No matter what happens from now on Harry will be given the same consideration as GWB.
The very first casualty in is unit and any that follow will be broadcast as 'not Harry'.
Good thing that royalty is not elected.
8
posted on
05/18/2007 2:43:23 AM PDT
by
norton
To: ASC2006
Prince Harry banned from clubbing,
"Harry, you can't do that anymore!"
9
posted on
05/18/2007 2:44:43 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: ASC2006
Poor kid — they won’t let him fight or f**k!
10
posted on
05/18/2007 2:45:07 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: ASC2006
Prince Harry banned from clubbing
I'm more concerned he can't go "out on the razzle".
11
posted on
05/18/2007 2:50:31 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: Past Your Eyes
“...while his Army unit are away”????? Good grief, whatever happened to the Queen’s English?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not considered important now, it detracts from the desired hysteria over gorebull warming!
12
posted on
05/18/2007 3:16:13 AM PDT
by
RipSawyer
(Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
To: Past Your Eyes
That is the Queen's English.
Collective nouns can take the plural verb form when the emphasis is on the body as a whole.
13
posted on
05/18/2007 3:20:11 AM PDT
by
TomB
("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
To: TomB
Don't you mean 'that
ARE the Queen's English', English being a collective noun?
Where I come from, unit means one. Hard to get any more singular than one.
14
posted on
05/18/2007 3:27:25 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: TomB
You might as well say “To each their own”.
15
posted on
05/18/2007 3:28:51 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: TomB
You might as well say “To each their own”.
16
posted on
05/18/2007 3:28:51 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: Past Your Eyes
Oops. Now that was a plural post. Quite unintentionally, my good man. Work fast and make mistakes.
17
posted on
05/18/2007 3:29:53 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: Past Your Eyes
and this one:
has now bee banned from
must be "Quee's" English?
(snort)
18
posted on
05/18/2007 3:30:39 AM PDT
by
ZinGirl
To: Past Your Eyes
Now that was a plural post. Should that be "Now those were plural posts" ?
;->
19
posted on
05/18/2007 3:37:56 AM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Izzy Dunne
If I had some eggs I could have some ham and eggs if I had some ham.
20
posted on
05/18/2007 3:52:16 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
