Posted on 05/14/2007 1:58:16 PM PDT by Unmarked Package
Would you expect a former writer for the Village Voice and The Nation to be harshly critical of soon-to-be-Dr. Al Gore and his band of not-so merry manmade global warming alarmists?
Neither would I.
Yet there it was in the leftwing newsletter CounterPunch, written by editor Alexander Cockburn.
*****Critical Update: Cockburn's article published by The Nation.
Entitled Hot Air, Cold Cash; Who are the Merchants of Fear?, the piece absolutely eviscerated all those advancing the theory of anthropogenic global warming for what Cockburn believed to be financial and political gain (emphasis added throughout):
No response is more predictable than the reflexive squawk of the Greenhouse fearmongers that anyone questioning their claims is in the pay of the energy companies.Surprising statements from someone that supported Ralph Nader for president in 2000 and 2004, wouldnt you agree?[...]
In fact, when it comes to corporate sponsorship of crackpot theories about why the world is getting warmer, the best documented conspiracy of interest is between the Greenhouser fearmongers and the nuclear industry, now largely owned by oil companies, whose prospects twenty years ago looked dark, amid headlines about the fall-out from Chernobyl, aging plants and nuclear waste dumps leaking from here to eternity. The apex Greenhouse fearmongers are well aware that the only exit from the imaginary crisis they have been sponsoring is through a door marked "nuclear power", with a servant's sidedoor labeled "clean coal".
Yet, Cockburns sharpest attacks were directed at Al Gore:
The world's best known hysteric and self promoter on the topic of man's physical and moral responsibility for global warming is Al Gore, a shill for the nuclear industry and the coal barons from the first day he stepped into Congress entrusted with the sacred duty to protect the budgetary and regulatory interests of the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Oakridge National Lab. White House "task forces" on climate change in the Clinton-Gore years were always well freighted by Gore and his adviser John Holdren with nukers like John Papay of Bechtel.How delicious. But dont go to the snack bar for Goobers and Raisinets yet, sports fans, for there was more:
As a denizen of Washington since his diaper years Gore has always understood that threat inflation is the surest tool to plump up budgets and rabblerouse the voters. By the mid Nineties he positioned himself at the head of a strategic and tactical alliance formed around "the challenge of climate change", which had now stepped forward to take Communism's place in the threatosphere essential to all political life. Indeed, it was in the New Republic, a tireless publicist of the Soviet menace in the late 70s and Reagan 80s, that Gore announced in 1989 that the war on warming couldn't be won without a renewal in spiritual values.
All Al Gore has ever needed is a hot day or some heavy rain as opportunity to promote the unassailable theory of man-made global warming Come a rainy summer ('95), a perfectly routine El Nino ('97) or forest fire in Florida ('98) and Gore was there for the photo op, the uplifted finger warning of worse warming to come. '97 also found Gore in Glacier National Park, pointing at Grinnell glacier and telling the press gravely that it was melting, which indeed it has been since the end of the Little Ice Age,1450 to 1800. Mid-latitude glaciers expanded then, just as they contracted in the Medieval Warming Period, hotter than today and thus so vexing to climate alarmists like Michael Mann (now a reigning weather bureaucrat at the IPCC) that they had wiped it off their historical temperature graphs, just like an editor in Stalin's time cropping a team photo of early Bolsheviks to get rid of recently anathematized undesirables.
How marvelous. Yet, Cockburn was also disdainful of the United Nations, something rather uncommon amongst liberals:
The cycle of alarmist predictions is now well established. Not so long before some new UN moot on What To Do About the Weather, a prominent fearmonger like James Hansen or Michael Mann will make a tremulous statement about the accelerating tempo and dimensions of the warming crisis. The cry is taken up by the IPCC, (and in the 1990s, by the Clinton/Gore White House), with the press releases headlined by the New York Times, with exactly the same intentional lack of critical evaluation as that newspaper's recycling of the government's lies about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Months and years later come the qualifications and the retractions, long after new contracts and grants have been awarded, and fresh legions hired to staff the ever-expanding empires of the threatmongers. Back in the early 1970s, in agencies such as its Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) the UN did nourish some quite radical plans for a new international economic order, one establishing more favorable terms of trade for the poorer nations. By the late 70s all such hopes were vanishing under the neoliberal tide and the Reagan-Clinton era finished them off. By the late 1980s the UN high brass clearly perceived the "challenge" of climate change to be the horse to ride to build up the organization's increasingly threadbare moral authority, and to claim a role beyond that of being an obvious American errand boy. In 1988, the United Nations Environment Program, originally formed in 1972, was united in unholy bureaucratic matrimony with the UN's World Meteorological Organization, giving us the IPCC.
Cockburn crescendoed to the following conclusion:
As with the arms spending spiral powered by the Cold War merchants of fear, vast amounts of money will be uselessly spent on programs that won't work against an enemy that doesn't exist. Meanwhile, real and curable environmental perils are scanted or ignored. Hysteria rules the day, drowning urgently needed environmental cleanup in our backyard while smoothing the way for the nuclear industry to reap its global rewards.
Regardless of the differences inherent in Cockburns politics and those of the average NewsBusters reader, the reality is that if more left-leaning writers begin disseminating skeptical views on this important issue, maybe Gore and the alarmists will be defeated.
We can only hope.
I disagree with your post in that this gentleman does indeed repeatedly refer to facts ... just prior to his name calling. Gore’s current game is in the political arena, so heis fair game for this sort of piece.
The purpose of the author’s tirade IS to refute Gore’s claims and to discredit him as a legitimate spokesman for “the movement”. As such his vitriol is well-founded in fact and opinion.
I read this as a quality, humorous and biting opinion piece.
*even if the guy is a certified nut case ;-)
Wow. Who are you and what have you done with Alexander Cockburn?
“but lefties are generally unstable...”
should read.....”but lefties are generally adolescent psychotics...”
Of course we can, but it is delightfully fun when one can lighten up a bit and enjoy it when the wackos turn on each other.
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Start a fear mongering religion, with its own set of indulgences, set up a company to sell those indulgences, buy your own indulgences and guilt others into doing so also.
Al Gore reminds me of the Brother Justin character in Carnivale. Both seem equally possessed and seductively evil for naive, guilt ridden masochists who live to be scared out of their wits.
Start a fear mongering religion, with its own set of indulgences, set up a company to sell those indulgences, buy your own indulgences and guilt others into doing so also.
Al Gore reminds me of the Brother Justin character in Carnivale. Both seem equally possessed and seductively evil for naive, guilt ridden masochists who live to be scared out of their wits.
Cockburn’s actually 2 fer 2 lately - he also called for arming teachers or principals in the wake of the VT shootings and absolutely ripped into school adminstrators.
btt
The next AOL, the next WorldCom (fraudulent rip-off companies similar to Enron, but never given the degree of exposure in the media as evil capitalist companies that Enron was) will be corporations that peddle carbon credits. Before that happens, however, Gore and a few of his cronies and family members will become mega-billionaires, allowing them to build a few extra trophy homes, and buy a few extra private jet to fly around the planet in.
I love the sound of Left on Left violence...it sounds like...victory
“Hysteria rules the day.”
Whatever else, he’s right there, and not just about global warming.
Ha, I bet Cockburn spends his evenings writing “Second Front Now” on building’s walls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.