Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daimler pays to dump Chrysler
CNN ^ | Monday, May 14, 2007 | Chris Isidore

Posted on 05/14/2007 11:22:44 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- DaimlerChrysler moved to undo the most expensive and one of the least successful mergers in auto industry history Monday as it agreed to essentially pay to dump the money-losing Chrysler unit which it paid $37 billion for nine years ago.

DaimlerChrysler (Charts) announced it will sell an 80 percent stake in its U.S. brand to Cerberus Capital Management, a private equity investment firm that will pay $7.4 billion.

But the German automaker, which will be renamed simply Daimler, will not actually get most of the money that Cerberus is paying for the once proud automaker. Instead Cerberus will contribute $5 billion to the Chrysler auto operations it will now control, with just over another $1 billion going to Chrysler's finance arm.

While Daimler will receive the remaining $1.4 billion of Cerberus' capital contribution to the sale, Daimler expects to have to cover another $1.6 billion in Chrysler losses before the deal closes. So Daimler estimates that it will end up paying out about $650 million to close the deal, and that its earnings for 2007 will take a $4 billion to $5.4 billion profit hit due to charges related to the transaction.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Germany
KEYWORDS: automakers; chrysler; daimler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2007 11:22:47 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

For Sale By Owner:
1 Slightly Used Automobile Company
Hardly Driven, Low Incentives, Low Quality, Workers overpaid,
Will not last...........


2 posted on 05/14/2007 11:25:47 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

But; but ; they said they bought it because they wanted to know how Chrysler made a profit on cars.


3 posted on 05/14/2007 11:26:32 AM PDT by bullfeather (illegitimate non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Coyote ugly.


4 posted on 05/14/2007 11:27:03 AM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
DaimlerChrysler moved to undo the most expensive and one of the least successful mergers in auto industry history Monday as it agreed to essentially pay to dump the money-losing Chrysler unit which it paid $37 billion for nine years ago.

DaimlerChrysler (Charts) announced it will sell an 80 percent stake in its U.S. brand to Cerberus Capital Management, a private equity investment firm that will pay $7.4 billion.

Never has much been lost by so few in so short a time...

5 posted on 05/14/2007 11:27:30 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
DaimlerChrysler moved to undo the most expensive and one of the least successful mergers in auto industry history Monday as it agreed to essentially pay to dump the money-losing Chrysler unit which it paid $37 billion for nine years ago.

DaimlerChrysler (Charts) announced it will sell an 80 percent stake in its U.S. brand to Cerberus Capital Management, a private equity investment firm that will pay $7.4 billion.

Never has so much been lost by so few in so short a time...

6 posted on 05/14/2007 11:28:06 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The sad thing is that if Chrysler made a good car, the World would beat a path to their door.


7 posted on 05/14/2007 11:28:06 AM PDT by gridlock (On January 20, 2009, Fred Dalton Thompson will be sworn in as President of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bullfeather

Well, they found out didn’t they?


8 posted on 05/14/2007 11:28:56 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

They got the looks part okay, they just gotta work on that stuff inside, .......


9 posted on 05/14/2007 11:30:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SQUID

LOL! They did.


10 posted on 05/14/2007 11:30:33 AM PDT by listenhillary (Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
7.4 Billion.. I have a sneaking suspicion this is probably the value of raw assets only such as land and equipment.. I wonder if we will even see Chrysler in existence in a few years or will all the plants and land be sold off as scrap?
11 posted on 05/14/2007 11:32:30 AM PDT by mnehring (McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Chrysler isn’t hurting, JEEP brand is riding high, 300’s are selling well, and the PT Cruiser still sells... Sebring convertible is still the choice of folks who want a convertable and need a real back seat. Dodge is doing well with its trucks and some of its retro muscle car stuff.

Problem with Chrysler is the same its always been QUALITY CONTROL.... Engineered some great stuff over the years only to have those great designs be executed poorly.

Merging with Damler was stupid, and made no sense from the get go IMHO. CEO got his giant parachute and walked away, he didn’t care about the long term of the company... as very few ever do these days.

It will be interesting to see what exactly happens with Chrysler going forward.


12 posted on 05/14/2007 11:32:56 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Look for Daimler to open the new Socialist School of Business and technology and show us all how it is done.


13 posted on 05/14/2007 11:34:53 AM PDT by listenhillary (Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
It's interesting who is buying an 80% stake in the company (Cerberus Capital Management). It's also interesting as well who is a member of this group (John Snow). Hopefully this will translate into better decision making. But that remains to be seen since the Germans (Daimler-Chrysler) still maintains 20% ownership.

I really, really don't think Deiter inspired or anything else American customers with his commercials either. But alas we have lost many good American cars over the last few years and not to foreign owners.
14 posted on 05/14/2007 11:37:02 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Daimler’s Mercedes unit has had terrible quality control problems in the last few years itself.

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/01/mercedes_ads.html


15 posted on 05/14/2007 11:37:44 AM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
I tend to agree with your take. Chrysler does indeed have some good looking products out there, but the quality control does stink. A fellow employee of mine bought a Jeep Commander and it looks and feels nice except he kept on having to take it back to dealer because he could here wind noise thourgh the seal on the front windshield. Took 3 trips to dealer to finally get it resolved.
16 posted on 05/14/2007 11:38:30 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Drive By Media is America's worst enemy and American people don't know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I guess Daimler didn’t get a Carfax auto report before they bought.

}:-)4


17 posted on 05/14/2007 11:39:38 AM PDT by Moose4 ("(Rudy's) the exact same animal as Hillary only he wears a dress." --Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
Maybe this explains why when I was recently shopping for a used Corvette (which I bought!), I noticed used Mercedes were going for what I considered dirt cheap!

I was somewhat surprised to see them depreciating so badly! I mean 2002 S series selling for under $16K?

18 posted on 05/14/2007 11:41:36 AM PDT by KenHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
My Chrysler Sucks
19 posted on 05/14/2007 11:42:36 AM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS Is A Slap In The Face To The USBP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
The sad thing is that if Chrysler made a good car, the World would beat a path to their door.

Chrysler has made plenty of good cars. Ever hear of the Viper, the Dodge Caravan, Jeeps?

When Daimler-Benz bought Chrysler they took a decent company with some good stuff just out (the Dodge Intrepid, Neon, and the most successful Dodge truck line ever) with some fun stuff on the drawing board (new 300, Plymouth PT Cruiser) and immediately went to work messing up the company. They ditched Plymouth and bastardized the formerly semi-upscale Chrysler badge by selling Chrysler Neons.

Sure, lots of crap came from Chrysler during the '70s and '80s, but Daimler bought a healthy company and ruined it, just as AT&T did with their NCR buy out, and Unisys did with the Sperry/Burroughs merger.

There are plenty of good cars that didn't sell well, (Corvair, AMC Javelin, Oldsmobile Aurora), and plenty of crummy cars that sold fairly well (Pontiac Fiero, any GM with a Quad-4 engine, Ford Windstar, Toyota Previa minivan (1st version))

Marketing and perceived value and proper pricing (the Aurora and new T-bird were too dang expensive) are part of the equation, too.
20 posted on 05/14/2007 11:45:00 AM PDT by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson