Fredipedia v2.30: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
Posted on 05/12/2007 2:49:44 AM PDT by Josh Painter
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision upholding the ban on partial birth abortion, proponents of abortion have reacted as if the sky were falling. Abortion proponents have grimly announced that a "womans right to choose" is in peril. Of course, they speak about the "right to choose" only in the abstract; they are careful not to identify the choice they have in view.
The morality of any "choice" under consideration, however, cannot be divorced from the thing that is being chosen. Choices are not mere abstractions. They are concrete, and they have consequences. Let's not kid ourselves about what is at stake in the "choice" debate. When abortion advocates talk about the "right to choose", they are not talking about the right to choose between chocolate and vanilla. They are talking about the right to choose to kill an innocent unborn child. The fact that a mother would contemplate killing her child, and that there are those who zealously advocate such a "choice", is evidence that something has gone very, very wrong in our society. As the Feminists for Life slogan puts it, "women deserve better than abortion." Indeed they do, and so do their children.
Adoption is an option that is not discussed nearly enough in the public debate about "choice". Rarely is the case for adoption made with the same vigor as the case for abortion...
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
When my two children were conceived, the “gentlemen” who had done the deeds believed that their responsiblities ended with the offer to pay for an abortion.
Thankfully, the women involved chose to place them for adoption and we have two teenagers who cause us joy, anguish, pride, anger and every other emotion that parents of teenage kids experience.
We thank God for their courageous choices every day.
These are the people who have the greatest influence over whether their pregnant daughter aborts, keeps the infant, or puts it up for adoption.
Any campaigns **must** be aimed at the future grandmothers.
The church I belong to is doing this with very good success.
When people ask us why we adopted children from overseas, one of the reasons we give is because American babies who should be available for adoption are either murdered before or as they are being born or kept as welfare hostages.
Not only that, but the litigious nature of American society makes domestic adoption very tenuous and precarious. There were a couple of famous cases where three-year-olds were ripped out of good adoptive homes by the courts to be placed with their biological mothers.
I thank God every day that my son’s birth mother chose adoption over abortion. He is truly the light of our lives.
I’m 43 years old, and thank God every day that my mother gave me up for adoption. A single woman in a small north Texas town realized that she couldn’t provide much of a life for a child - and at a week old, I was adopted by my Mom and Dad.
I have known for as long as I can remember that I was adopted. I have known for as long as I can remember that to adopt a stranger’s child and raise him or her as your own is itsself the definition of a love beyond defining.
I have had to describe to non-adoptees (and you adoptees out there will know what I’m talking about) that my mother is my birth-mother - but my Mom and Dad are my Mom and Dad - no ifs, ands, or buts about it. They are my parents, God bless them - and God truly blessed me when He brought me into their lives.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
**Very** good way to put it!
I wonder if they are fed Soylent Green?
We adopted our daughter. Life could not be sweeter. As so many adopted parents say, their children may not have grown in their tummies, they grew in their hearts. She is my light and my life.
I think there is still a stigma in society about adoption. Like the children are somewhat *less*. Less worthy. Less loved. Less a family. Less whatever. I find that appalling. I know without a doubt that she is ours, totally and completely. This may sound silly, but even our friends and relatives totally believe her guardian angel was new on the job and dropped that new little soul at the wrong house and it took my grandmother’s loving spirit to bring her back where she belonged. Thank you, grandma.
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision upholding the ban on partial birth abortion, proponents of abortion have reacted as if the sky were falling. Abortion proponents have grimly announced that a "womans right to choose" is in peril. Of course, they speak about the "right to choose" only in the abstract; they are careful not to identify the choice they have in view.
The morality of any "choice" under consideration, however, cannot be divorced from the thing that is being chosen. Choices are not mere abstractions. They are concrete, and they have consequences. Let's not kid ourselves about what is at stake in the "choice" debate. When abortion advocates talk about the "right to choose", they are not talking about the right to choose between chocolate and vanilla. They are talking about the right to choose to kill an innocent unborn child. The fact that a mother would contemplate killing her child, and that there are those who zealously advocate such a "choice", is evidence that something has gone very, very wrong in our society. As the Feminists for Life slogan puts it, "women deserve better than abortion." Indeed they do, and so do their children.
Adoption is an option that is not discussed nearly enough in the public debate about "choice". Rarely is the case for adoption made with the same vigor as the case for abortion. Part of the zeal for abortion is fueled by money. We should never forget that abortion is a multi-million dollar industry. With that kind of money at stake, it is easy to see why abortion proponents get so pumped up.
In the abortion debate, Americans are being asked to choose between a woman and her child. We are asked to come down on one side or the other. The debate is framed as an "either / or" proposition. When the adoption option is introduced, however, the debate is transformed into a "both / and" proposition. We do not have to choose between a woman and her child. Our hearts are big enough to love them both.
Adoption is truly a win/win/win situation. With adoption, the child "wins" because he or she is not only given the chance to live, but to live in a home with loving parents who can provide for his or her needs. Adoption is also a win for those couples who choose to adopt because they have the benefit of a precious new life to nurture. Finally, adoption is a win for the birth mother because she benefits from knowing that she has made the mature and beautiful choice of giving life to a child, providing for that child by finding a safe and happy home, and selflessly sharing that new life with others. When adoptions are done right they are occasions for joy all around.
Studies have shown that children who were born out-of-wedlock but are raised by adoptive parents do better in a number of categories than those who are raised by single mothers. They attain higher levels of education, have higher self-esteem, and enjoy better health. Similarly, adoption is also good for birth mothers. Such women are more likely to be employed a year after the adoption, more likely to complete their educations, and they are more likely to express overall satisfaction with life than their single-mother counterparts.
Despite all its advantages, adoption has fallen on hard times. According to research, there has been a precipitous drop in adoption since the year 1973 when abortion was legalized across America. Before 1973, 8.7 percent of children born out-of-wedlock were placed for adoption. Recent statistics put the number at around one-percent. This huge drop in adoption has many causes. First, there is less social stigma than there used to be attached to the idea of raising a child as a single parent. Second, there is more social pressure in favor of abortion today than there was in the past. Third, there is a lack of information about adoption provided to women who find themselves in a crisis pregnancy. Forth, adoption can be legally confusing and expensive. There are any number of other reasons that can be added to this list.
One matter that should be of significant concern for the pro-life movement is that young women facing crisis pregnancies often have false ideas about adoption. A study commissioned by Family Research Council several years ago, entitled The Missing Piece: Adoption Counseling in Pregnancy Resource Centers, did a magnificent job of shedding light on the painful assumptions that many women have when it comes to adoption. Women in crisis pregnancies tend to think of adoption as an abandonment of their child. They are often convinced that no other family can love their child as much as they do. They have heard horror stories about children mistreated by adoptive parents, and they assume that to place a child for adoption is to simply give the child away without any control over where he or she is placed. Many women do not think they are strong enough to "give a way" their children, that it is too great of a sacrifice, and that abortion is actually easier than adoption. The Missing Piece also found, however, that more emotionally mature women were usually in a better position to seriously consider the option of adoption. They were able to see that by choosing adoption they were putting their child's needs over their own.
Women facing crisis pregnancies need to know that, today, placing their child for adoption is not simply handing the baby over without any knowledge of how he or she will be raised. The modern adoption process frequently gives pregnant women an opportunity to be a big part of the process. These days, mothers are often afforded the opportunity to help choose the type of family in which their child will be placed. And many women who choose adoption are often allowed to maintain an element of continuing involvement that helps them know that they are not in any way abandoning their baby.
Sadly, we do not spend enough time celebrating women who make such a mature and strong choice in favor of life. Needless to say, thousands of lives across America attest to the success of adoption. It is one thing to demand a right to choose; it is another thing to choose well. Here's to the mothers who have chosen life and shared that life with others!
I believe in abortion for men. Here’s how it works: the man has a choice between supporting the child or signing away parental rights, which would be the equivalent of an abortion for him. If he chooses “abortion” he would never be permitted to come anywhere near the child until the child is an adult. Although the mother would not receive child support, the child is better off without that kind of a father, and also the door is open for the future husband of the mother to adopt the child.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.