Skip to comments.
Washington State: Kids could be stuck in booster seats until 16
The Everett Herald ^
| May 11, 2007
| Scott Pesznecker and Melissa Slager
Posted on 05/11/2007 6:54:57 AM PDT by Stoat
Thousands of Washington children will be forced back into car and booster seats next month when a change to state law takes effect. On June 1, children will have to stay in the safety seats until they are at least 8 years old or 4 feet, 9 inches tall. Violators face a $112 ticket. About half of all children between 6 to 8 years old will be affected by the change, according to safety advocates. "It's going to be a big challenge for those kids who have been out of the booster seat to get back," said Shawneri Guzman of Snohomish County SAFE KIDS, a nonprofit group that works to prevent childhood injuries. The change means parents such as Renee Shonko, 44, of Lake Stevens must break the news to their children. Daughters Lexi, 8, and Karly, 10, aren't exactly thrilled to be going back into booster seats. "I don't like it," said Karly, who at 4-foot-8 (with shoes on) is taller than most of her classmates. But that's not tall enough for a seat belt to fit her properly. Currently, children are required to ride in booster seats until they're 6 years old or weigh 60 pounds. The changes also require children to use booster seats until they are 16 years old if a vehicle's seat belt does not properly fit the child. Another change requires children younger than 13 to ride in the back seat whenever possible. They're allowed to ride in the front only if the vehicle has no lap-and-shoulder belts in the back seat. |
|
(Excerpt) Read more at heraldnet.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: automotive; booster; boosterseat; cars; driving; kids; nannystate; nocrimeinwashington; safetynazis; stupidity; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 261-270 next last
To: Stoat
I’ve seen these Public Service Announcements. I can just imagine how humiliating it would be for a small teenager to be forced into one of these seats! I don’t understand why they’re necessary. You can purchase clips that will keep over the shoulder seat belts in the proper position for shorter folks.
181
posted on
05/11/2007 11:53:09 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Stoat
He honked at people when there was any conceivable chance that they might be a hazard, such as people walking near the road ("they might stumble and fall in front of the car") Yeah, like when someone behind him startles him by honking for no reason.
182
posted on
05/11/2007 11:58:05 AM PDT
by
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
To: Bigh4u2
BTW. They passed the same stupid law in New York State. Thanks....And here I was prepared to get all high and mighty about moving here from WA state last month... :(
To: Paperdoll; kerryusama04
What will they come up with next in Commie Washington State? Breast feed until 20?"sigh"
The Washington State FReepers and the climate make it worthwhile, but for me at least, if it were not for those attributes and the responsibilities which keep me here, I would have moved long ago despite this being the State of my birthplace.
kerryusama04 is recommending Missouri at #154 here, and I have heard many FReepers say glowing, appreciative things about Texas. Yesterday on his radio show Mark Levin said some extremely complimentary things about South Carolina, and so I know that there are other options.
I hope that one day I will have the opportunity to investigate at least some of them, as being continually embarrassed by my State, it's laws and it's elected 'leaders' gets very old very fast.
184
posted on
05/11/2007 12:18:34 PM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
I only wish I lived in Washington. Maybe someday they will wipe the ass of anyone who is over the age of 50.
To: Stoat
And where is Chloe’s belt, hmmmm? Oh, the humanity.
To: r9etb
Come on, r9. Their white.
To: Stoat
The thing that pissses me off the most is that those small, backless boosters can't be used unless the car's back seat has headrests. My Geo Metro certainly doesn't have headrests on the back seats. So we're stuck with the clunky big seats. Also, a lot of lower-income people are going to be rightfully indignant about having to buy new child seats to replace the ones that they got rid of. Including this low-income person.
Wonder what the safety Nazis think about my taking the 6 yr old to the shooting range (to shoot!)? Or on the motorbike? (I'd better shut up).
188
posted on
05/11/2007 12:26:15 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
To: Bigh4u2
No the Or would mean a kid 8 years old *or* 4’9 does not have to wear the belt. Should be and a kid at least 8 years old *and* over 4’9 dont need it..
189
posted on
05/11/2007 12:29:11 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
To: Hegewisch Dupa; The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
that’s gotta be you posting under a diff name to yourself....
190
posted on
05/11/2007 12:31:22 PM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: Alouette
Another 2 inches and I will require a booster seat! And I am a grandmother. Same height as my wife, evidently.
Fortunately our kids (we have custody and are guardians) had a real tall dad, but I am ticked off just the same.
Another thing that gets me is that I occasionally put the taller one in the front seat (no air bags) when we need to fold down the back seat to carry something. Can't do that anymore.
Screw the governor and the Washington State Patrol for mindlessly enforcing this!
191
posted on
05/11/2007 12:32:34 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
To: Stoat
More gov. BS. I guess were just too stupid to care for ourselves.
Reminds me of the movie “Time Machine”.
To: xsmommy
From what I’ve learned here, if I were to do that I would invent some geek babe to be all into me, not some more competition for the delicious MLR...
To: Hegewisch Dupa
how can there possibly be another freak at FR who shares your bizarre taste?
194
posted on
05/11/2007 12:38:16 PM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: xsmommy; The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
Hey GofRMcR - you’re being dissed. I thinks she’s jealous.
To: xsmommy
Mnnnn...she’s gorgeous. Always felt that way.
To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
You the man!
(But keep your hands off her - I called her first)
To: Hegewisch Dupa
I even think Christine Baranski’s hot. Guess I see sexiness where others don’t . LOL Hard to beat Jamie Lee Curtis, though.
To: The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
Hmmmm - I even think you're right...
To: Hegewisch Dupa; The Ghost of Rudy McRomney
how nice you found a twin ; )-
200
posted on
05/11/2007 1:15:40 PM PDT
by
xsmommy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 261-270 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson