[blogblogginaway]

I respectfully don’t see where this is ‘breaking news’ but you da man....:) As far as I’m concerned his ‘views’ on abortion are not news at all. I haven’t been following all the candidates that closely and I have seen him state his views on this issue very clearly on several occasions.

Who would you rather see get the nomination? Realistically, (at this point in time) it would be Giuliani. I personally don’t have a problem with him stating he would ‘support’ the laws in place as they stand today. He has respect for our laws and to say anything different would be meaningless. We all know the only way to outlaw abortions is via the supreme court. So ‘if’ Guiliani is our nominee and ‘whoever’ is the dem nominee, who do we trust will make the more conservative appointment to the SC?

I know the issue of abortion is the single most important issue to some. However if I had to chose one single issue that will determine who I will vote for come Nov. ‘08 it is national security. Guiliani is the ‘only’ person in the race at this moment who I would trust with my whole being when it comes to this issue.

I know I will offend some taking this stance concerning this article. We all have differing opinions and I respect everyone’s opinion and beliefs but when it comes down to it are we willing to turn the presidency over to a liberal because we don’t agree with Guiliani respecting the laws that are currently in place?

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

All Blue in here...mmmm...

[Spiff]

BZZZZZZTTTT!!!!! Another traitor to humanity gets zapped.

[Clemenza]

National security? You mean like telling Arafat to shove it in the most Jewish city in America, while embracing Gerry Adams a month earlier? You mean like giving a glorified stump speech in front of a bunch of burning buildings? You mean like attending a cholo festival in Queens?

Giuliani's grasp of foreign policy might as well come from reading placemats at a Chinese restaurant. The man is clueless.

[jdm]

...are we willing to turn the presidency over to a liberal because we don’t agree with Guiliani respecting the laws that are currently in place?

Giuliani IS a liberal. You just don't get it.

[CindyDawg]

Let’s see.. Vote for a leader that stands against values that are most precious to you because he says, if you elect me, you can still do what you want?

[Lexinom]

If we're fighting this WOT to defend a nation that cannot defend its weakest and most innocent, that shows a proclivity toward redefinition of historic word meanings, whose courts seek removal of the Deity Who has so graciously blessed her... What on earth are we fighting for?

[Alberta's Child]

Giuliani is a flawed candidate for a number of reasons. Abortion is not a "single issue" at all . . . His attitude towards abortion is indicative of his disregard for Constitutional law in other areas, too (e.g., his well-documented hostility towards the Second Amendment and his administration's disgraceful violation of the Fourth Amendment).

However if I had to chose one single issue that will determine who I will vote for come Nov. ‘08 it is national security. Guiliani is the ‘only’ person in the race at this moment who I would trust with my whole being when it comes to this issue.

You're certainly free to take that position, but I think you'd be hard-pressed to come up with even one objective reason why Giuliani is any better than any other GOP candidate in this regard.

[Old_Mil]

However if I had to chose one single issue that will determine who I will vote for come Nov. ‘08 it is national security. Guiliani is the ‘only’ person in the race at this moment who I would trust with my whole being when it comes to this issue.

Even if you are a single issue voter on national security, throwing your support behind the mayor of a sanctuary city who supports open border policies, gun control, and has no military experience is hardly a way to ensure that the nation stays secure.

Instead, you'd be better served supporting Duncan Hunter, former chair of the armed services committee, a Vietnam veteran himself, with a son who served in Iraq.