Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Plans to Publicly Embrace Abortion Rights [Rudy declares war on conservatism]
New York Times ^ | May 10, 2007 | By ADAM NAGOURNEY and MARC SANTORA

Posted on 05/09/2007 7:17:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 441-456 next last
To: Jim Robinson
For his presence during 9/11, I am always grateful.

But he continues to make himself even LESS electable. Maybe 20 years ago it was possible, but the prolife base in the Republican primary is WAY too strong for him to get nominated.

361 posted on 05/10/2007 9:35:30 AM PDT by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; dirtboy
Dirtboy: State by state process, as it was before Roe.
Spiff: GOP nat'l platform says that a Human Life Amendment should be passed

Good luck with a nat'l amendment; the proper fora are the respective states. That being said, I'd be hard pressed to envision any political process by which individual states would (re)enact police enforcement against women seeking abortions. A more likely scenario would be maintenance of the status quo, which means choice.

Dirtboy: Rudy has spoken out in favor of Roe

If true, then this should be your angle of attack. At best, you're limited in support for criminalization. As to Roe, I can't imagine any conservative, no matter how moderate, that supports this constitutional monstrosity. If Rudy is pro-Roe on constitutional grounds, then he has a real problem amongst those that are ambivalent as to criminalization.

362 posted on 05/10/2007 9:36:55 AM PDT by Chuck Dent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U; All

“We’ll move on to the Gun issue, the queer agenda issue, the sanctuary city issue, the mobbed up friends issue, the illegal kickbacks issue, the.....”

Ad nauseum,ad infinitum......

ROTFLMAO!!


363 posted on 05/10/2007 9:38:25 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Well done. Thank you for the excellent positions summary.


364 posted on 05/10/2007 9:39:05 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
The family tree of Eric Rudolph.......

**************

Aw, no, he's gone. I planned to respond to that when I returned home from the dentist. Now he'll never know of my disdain. Ah, well.

365 posted on 05/10/2007 9:40:45 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Stick a fork in Rudy......he’s DONE


366 posted on 05/10/2007 9:41:01 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We are now officially at war for the soul of the party.

Yep.

But it was awfully nice of him to finally drop the mask.

L

367 posted on 05/10/2007 9:43:04 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing 'moderate' islam to 'extremist' islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"Will the pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun planks be removed from the GOP platform to accommodate Rudy?"

One of my biggest fears is that that's exactly what will happen. Worse than that, however, is that in order to "accomodate" Giuliani, one must accept his view of the Constitution as a mere compilation of suggestions to be ignored when he feels the situation warrants.
368 posted on 05/10/2007 9:46:54 AM PDT by LIConFem (Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

Well, in the primaries, that change of tactics will doom him. It is a real shame since he was for a Big Tent, could have followed 4 ideas that would have captured the nomination with war, tax cuts, jurist appointments, border enforcement and now he has just doomed himself . I would have wished he could have swallowed this issue but he could not and I really believe this leaves Hil to go all the way. I am depressed over Pub chances for sure now.


369 posted on 05/10/2007 9:54:29 AM PDT by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Didn't we know he was pro-choice already? I guess we need the weekly Rudy bashing threads hehe.. Its cool... If Thompson doesnt get in the ring, Im supporting Rudy - even though we disagree on social issues.
370 posted on 05/10/2007 10:00:56 AM PDT by cdnerds (cdnerds.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: cdnerds
Didn't we know he was pro-choice already?

Yes, most of us knew. Except for the Giuliani supporters who have spent the past several months lying through their teeth about his position.

Oh, and Giuliani himself, since he spent the past several months lying through his teeth about his position.

371 posted on 05/10/2007 10:05:15 AM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Chuck Dent
If true, then this should be your angle of attack

Sorry, but I will attack Rudy from many, many directions. His perfect NARAL and Planned Parenthood ratings. His addressing NARAL - twice. His praise of Margaret Sanger at one of those speeches. His calling public abortion funding a right. And his claim that he would pay for his granddaughter to have an abortion.

And then there is gun control. His support of the gay agenda. His authoritarian control-freak methods. His pushing Kerik for the most important anti-terror job in the country.

Abortion is just one of many problems with Rudy. But so far, it's the anaconda that is slowly crushing Rudy in its coils.

372 posted on 05/10/2007 10:05:57 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: cdnerds
Didn't we know he was pro-choice already?

He and his toadies have been trying to pretend otherwise for the last few months.

I guess we need the weekly Rudy bashing threads hehe

What we need is a nominee from the center of the party. Not the far left. Rudy has no problem telling the pro-life movement to go pound sand. The GOP needs to realize that we have no problem telling Rudy to go pound sand in the general.

373 posted on 05/10/2007 10:10:27 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
but I will attack Rudy from many, many directions.

Sorry for not being more clear - I meant your angle of attack on abortion. I enjoy reading your many & varied posts on Rudy's different positions regarding gays, 2A, etc.

I just don't think the electorate is going to care - either primary voters or the general. I think he's going to pull off an Arnie on a nat'l scale.

I saw Arnie in public two times during the run-up to the Calif recall: his first day of announcement, and his last appearance before the polls opened.

This type of appeal can't be manufactured; it either exists or it doesn't. For good or bad, BJ (but thankfully, not his dominatrix) possesses it for lefties.

You have an uphill battle in store fighting a symbol. I'm not sure you've yet discovered the chink(s) that will tarnish the image that people "see".

374 posted on 05/10/2007 10:15:01 AM PDT by Chuck Dent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Chuck Dent
I'm not sure you've yet discovered the chink(s) that will tarnish the image that people "see".

Rudy has many, many weaknesses. You can bleed him to death with a thousand cuts - and during the primary process, by addressing the base and encouraging them not to vote for Rudy. Rudy's only hope is a split conservative field. Fred's entry into the race would probably prevent that.

375 posted on 05/10/2007 10:17:32 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: cdnerds
Im supporting Rudy - even though we disagree on social issues.

I didn't know that coddling illegal aliens, running the nation's largest "sanctuary city", was a "social issue".

I didn't know that opposing individual rights to gun ownership and supporting national gun control was a "social issue".

I didn't know that opposing civil liberties was a "social issue."

I didn't know that putting the advancement of a corrupt, mobbed-up business partner (an incompetent high school dropout) ahead of national security was a "social issue."

I didn't know that belief in the global warming hoax and its inherent advancement of the envirowhacko agenda was a "social issue."

I didn't know that destroying unit cohesion and discipline by injecting liberal social experimentation into the military (gays openly serving in the military) was a "social issue."

I didn't know that Giuliani's statement about preparing for failure in Iraq or his lack of confidence that the war in Iraq will "turn around" coupled with the way he dodged the draft were "social issues."

I didn't know that turning New York City into the nation's largest debtor city (surpassed only by the Federal Government itself) was a "social issue."

Some people have really odd definitions for what "social issues" are.

376 posted on 05/10/2007 10:24:28 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Chuck Dent
Personal anecdote: I've had a chance to be within 30 yards of both RR & Arnie during their respective political moments. The crowd reaction was the same - the same animal instincts of being emotionally attracted to a 'winner'.

Arnie has made a fortune during his lifetime as a movie actor, so it should come as no surprise that he'd have an "aura" like that. I don't see how Giuliani -- a short, bald guy from New York who wears glasses and talks with a lisp -- could possible have that kind of stage presence.

I'd point out, however, that conservatives in California were the biggest losers in that recall campaign -- because when all was said and done, the state of California had a Democrat-controlled legislature and a leftist Republican governor who would sign anything that legislature passed. If this strikes you as a "winning" formula for the United States, then we're on completely different planets.

377 posted on 05/10/2007 10:30:30 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

JulieAnnie was never meant to be President of USA.


378 posted on 05/10/2007 10:37:40 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Let's call the Jr. Senator from Illinois by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

If you want us to all eat our own a year before the election, chant “don’t vote for Giuliani”.


379 posted on 05/10/2007 10:39:35 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Sorry, that would just be another way of making abortion the deciding issue.


380 posted on 05/10/2007 10:41:12 AM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 441-456 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson