This is to clear up why it seems the press is "under reporting" tornado
wind strength, in light of the recent events.
I doubt Dr. Fujita would be very happy with this "new scale"
1 posted on
05/08/2007 6:04:09 PM PDT by
xcamel
To: xcamel
Who knows, he said his old scale was not perfect and it needed improvements.
2 posted on
05/08/2007 6:07:40 PM PDT by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: xcamel
It's not that the wind is blowing, it is what the wind is blowing...
3 posted on
05/08/2007 6:07:42 PM PDT by
mnehring
(McCain '08 -------------------------------------- just kidding...)
To: xcamel
4 posted on
05/08/2007 6:08:30 PM PDT by
CindyDawg
To: xcamel
Why would he be unhappy with it? He agreed his scale was flawed.
To: xcamel
From one of your links: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/efscale/ Over the years, the F-Scale has revealed the following weaknesses: It is subjective based solely on the damage caused by a tornado No recognition in difference in construction Difficult to apply with no damage indicators if the 3/4-mile wide tornado does not hit any structures, what F-scale should be assigned? Subject to bias Based on the worst damage (even if it is one building or house) Overestimates wind speeds greater than F3
8 posted on
05/08/2007 6:21:38 PM PDT by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: xcamel
I didn't see , "Common soda straw half way through palm tree," listed up there.
5.56mm
19 posted on
05/09/2007 6:02:21 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson