Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xcamel

Why would he be unhappy with it? He agreed his scale was flawed.


5 posted on 05/08/2007 6:14:02 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Psycho_Bunny

His comment about “flawed” had to do with under reporting strength/damage ratios, and it was a huge political (politically correct) fight to get number approaching 300 mph even discussed openly. He knew higher was not only possible, but likely. The technology to accurately measure 10 second bursts (not 3 second like was agreed to) didn’t exist at the time. It does now, and he was dead on right... they (NOAA) are underreporting on purpose.


7 posted on 05/08/2007 6:20:50 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson