Posted on 05/08/2007 5:39:22 PM PDT by James W. Fannin
Immigration deal is near, says Specter |
|
|
May 09, 2007 | |
The Senates bipartisan immigration talks yesterday yielded the first stirrings of a grand bargain, but the fate of the compromise remained uncertain amid political pressure from interest groups and a potential filibuster. Sanctions for employers who hire illegal immigrants, thousands of new Border Patrol agents and a trigger mechanism to tackle border security are all under consideration, Specter said. But he warned that Reids plans to call up last years Senate-passed immigration bill which has lost significant support as a placeholder could bring the process to a halt. [There is a GOP] disinclination to support a motion to proceed to last years bill, Specter said, raising the possibility that there may be a filibuster there. Lawmakers from both ends of the ideological spectrum believe time is growing short for an immigration bill that can pass both houses before presidential politics take hold. The springs marathon talks have joined as many as a dozen senators with two Cabinet members representing the White House, but few negotiators were openly optimistic until yesterday. Reids plans remained firm, launching tomorrow with a so-called Rule 14 filing on either last years committee-passed or Senate-passed immigration bill. He urged Specters group to offer language as a substitute or in several amendments to that placeholder measure. Senators have known for two months that immigration would come up next week, Reid told reporters yesterday. Anyone who thinks two months is not enough time to get ready should get another occupation. Senate GOP Conference Chairman Jon Kyl (Ariz.), an opponent of last years bill turned White House ally in the negotiations, tamped down talk of a filibuster on the motion to proceed to placeholder legislation provided that it would be only a stand-in for a complete agreement that has yet to emerge. The question is, what if there isnt a bipartisan consensus [by next week]? If it cant be done, my preference would be [to] keep the process alive, Kyl said. Meanwhile, a coalition of labor and advocacy groups supporting a path to citizenship for the countrys 11 million immigrants kicked off a $250,000 campaign pushing Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) to back a path to citizenship for those in the country illegally. The Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CCIR) is running print advertisements and radio spots in Martinezs home state. The ads press the Republican National Committee (RNC) general chairman, a Cuban-American immigrant himself, to move the Senate away from a White House-floated proposal that immigrant-rights groups consider draconian. What were asking him to do is bring the debate to the center, the CCIR campaign manager, Clarissa Martinez, said. I think theyre putting the process in reverse with the negotiations going on today. Martinez was dismayed by the ad rollout, which comes not long after a cadre of RNC members attempted to block him from the partys helm for what they considered his too-soft stance on immigration. Considering the criticism from both sides of the immigration debate, Martinez said, I must be doing something right where the sweet spot is. Yet he acknowledged that the ads have caused a lot of consternation among Republicans who fear that political pressure will torpedo the consensus. Obviously, if one side or another decides they want this thing to fail before the 08 elections, were not going to get very far, Martinez said. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), another White House ally in the negotiating process, called the Martinez ads exceedingly bad form. This is bad news, because what it demonstrates is that some of the liberal groups dont feel like theyre going to get everything they want out of a consensus bill, Cornyn said. So theyre trying to undermine our ability to get a bill. The CCIR is compiling a bipartisan list of senators to target with future home-state ads, focusing on border states such as Texas and California, where Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) has indicated she no longer would back last years bill. Another swipe at the Senates compromise came from across the Capitol, where several border-first House Republicans, along with Democratic freshman Rep. Heath Shuler (N.C.), released a terse letter to their counterparts in the upper chamber. Its important that the Senate know that now there is strong opposition in the House of Representatives. Its bipartisan opposition to amnesty, Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.) told reporters. Jackie Kucinich contributed to this article. |
Senator Specter was largely responsible for last session’s albatross.
Maybe Reid will tie things up and we get a good case of gridlock.
Hope so, and I don’t believe Dennis could have a non-partisan child in the first place.
It is pretty pathetic when you have to filibuster your own president.
You said it, Ma’am.
“Comprehensive” immigration reform, when you can’t even control the border, is a con game, it is a fraud, it is a shell game, and I’m not buying.
Secure the border. Enforce the law. Do that and the problem will be manageable. Fail to do that and nothing will work. “Comprehensive” reform is a fig leaf meant to hide the fact that we are phasing out old notions of citizenship, leaving only geographic regions of no particular meaning, inhabited by people with no particular tie to one another, ruled by an elite with no particular guiding principle.
THERE IS GOOD NEWS TODAY ON ILLEGAL IMMIRGRATION. After threatening a veto, the governor of Oklahoma signed into law the toughest illegal immigration bill in the country. Other states take notice.
Why? Why? Why since the 2004 election has Specter been the face of the Republican Party? Turn on C-SPAN, news program, or go online and there he is giving the Republican response to any and everything.
Do Republicans realize what a turn-off he is to the base?
There are sinister forces at work here, I’m sure!
“Hope so...”
“”The CCIR is compiling a bipartisan list of senators to target with future home-state ads, focusing on border states such as Texas and California, where Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) has indicated she no longer would back last years bill.”
Feinstein out? It’s over.
In one month’s time these bizarre media articles writing as if the negotiations between extreme and extremer pro-amnesty factions of the Senate and the White House represent some kind of real bargaining process will die out.
I hope...
I think gridlock is grand sometimes, isn’t it?
If Specter supports it then is should be DOA.
Anything Sen Specter supports should immediatly be disqualified at the outset.
Let me guess...
some formula for eventual amnesty (amnesty with hoop jumping is still amnesty)
passage of the dream act in order to restore the “anchor babies” practice which was terminated in the 1996 immigration reform.
Relaxing of the current ten year rolling amnesty (harship visa based on stay of deportation of those in the USA for 10 years) documentation requirements.
Ted Kennedy will like it. (automatic bad thing)
“It is pretty pathetic when you have to filibuster your own president.”
Incredible!
The floodgates of hell will open and another 100 million 3rd worlders will storm across.
Specter is a creep, and has been forever.
Anything with his name on it stinks, period.
I suppose now that I should actually read the article, and the posts that follow.
Bernie Goldberg says Republicans see illegal aliens and Democrats see future voters.
Yes
Given the narrow victory margins in recent elections (sometimes a few votes), several million more Mexicans tip the balance permanently to the libs. We can kiss our hopes for a conservative majority bye-bye for the next fifty years.
Sarcozy won by advocating the exportation of sans papiers (undocumented). Take heed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.