Skip to comments.
Children 'bad for planet'_(hail the new religion of Mother Earth zombies)
news ^
| 5/7/07
| By Sarah-Kate Templeton in London
Posted on 05/06/2007 4:22:47 PM PDT by Flavius
HAVING large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags, says a report to be published today by a green think tank.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cult; cultureofdeath; doomage; ecofascism; environazis; environmentalists; envirowhackos; freakinidjits; globalwarming; malthus; wearedoomed; zombies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
1
posted on
05/06/2007 4:22:50 PM PDT
by
Flavius
To: Flavius
hail the new religion of Mother Earth zombies Don't you mean Earth old maids?
To: Flavius
...says a report to be published today by a green think tank."Green" and "think" are mutually exclusive terms...
To: Flavius
Those who fail to reproduce will cease to exist.
See: Europe.
4
posted on
05/06/2007 4:25:22 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: Flavius
So while the Ecopeans race to extinction, the Arabs and other Mohammadmen will overpopulate the planet?
To: Flavius
Someone tell the Muslims and the rest of the world.
Mark Steyn is right.
6
posted on
05/06/2007 4:26:56 PM PDT
by
IslandJeff
(Who the hell are we gonna nuke!?)
To: Flavius
If all the Greenies would just kill themselves, everyone could be happy.
To: Flavius
I don’t remember God mentioning a limit in Genesis 9:1 .....
8
posted on
05/06/2007 4:30:16 PM PDT
by
Disturbin
(Welcome to society -- morons with keys)
To: Flavius
The world's population is expected to increase by 2.5 billion to 9.2 billion by 2050. Almost all the growth will take place in developing countries. Funny how they forgot to mention that after 2050 the world population actual declines since most of Europe and the first world countries have a birth rate below 2.1 which is the replacement rate.
9
posted on
05/06/2007 4:31:25 PM PDT
by
Popman
(New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
To: Flavius
10
posted on
05/06/2007 4:33:15 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Flavius
Sounds eerily like the People’s Republic of China. Forced abortions for those who try to have over their allotted number of children.
To: Paleo Conservative
Don't you mean Earth old maids?
Sadly, some of them were probably modestly hot and available back
in the 1960s and 1970s.
And thus procreated before they ended up moving into their lesbian communes
to raise their off-spring.
12
posted on
05/06/2007 4:34:59 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Flavius
HAVING large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour Ha! They've frowned upon this for years, now they just have a new way to push it.
as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car
Yet the envirowhackos new 'god', algore, flies everywhere and drives an SUV. And they seem to see no conflict in this.
To: Flavius
“”The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child.””
The greatest thing?! This is one reason Europe is diein. The indigeous population bought the zero population line while groups like the Muslims propogated like rabbits.
This is the Chinese method of environmentalism. Murder a baby to save the environment! Usually a girl baby at that! Where are the feminists on this!?
14
posted on
05/06/2007 4:37:15 PM PDT
by
oneamericanvoice
(Support freedom! Support the troops!)
To: Flavius
15
posted on
05/06/2007 4:38:34 PM PDT
by
Popman
(New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
To: Flavius
A scientist friend of mine who’s a GW skeptic sent me a funny e-mail, in which he’d done the math and figured out that lean, fit 20-somethings who work out and jog all the time, etc., are putting more carbon into the air every year than the average car. Exercise is bad for the environment! I oughta post the e-mail.
16
posted on
05/06/2007 4:39:12 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: VOA
Not all the witches had the chance to procreate...they lost the opportunity to reproduce with some of their idols like Charlie Manson.
17
posted on
05/06/2007 4:39:58 PM PDT
by
eleni121
(+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
To: Flavius
Why is it always -- always -- the dyke-y eco-harpies of the extreme left who shrill and whinny most often about what the scientifically "right" number of children to have might be...... when they are, unfailingly, the dead last ones in all the whole, wide world genuinely needing to spend time worrying about ever facing such a decision in the first place, really...? ;)
18
posted on
05/06/2007 4:42:51 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: Flavius
HAVING large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as...failing to reuse plastic bags...Wow. I don't have kids, or take frequent flights, or drive a mega-SUV, but I do throw away plastic bags (can't stand those things). I guess that'll land me in the gulag with the rest of you "breeders".
19
posted on
05/06/2007 4:43:03 PM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback
20
posted on
05/06/2007 4:46:27 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson