Fredipedia v2.28: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
Posted on 05/04/2007 12:31:51 PM PDT by Josh Painter
Fredipedia v2.26: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
Please FReepmail jellybean if you want on/off this list. WARNING: This ping list can often be extremely active.
Are you going to have a live thread for this?
Yup. If someone else starts it, I will ping to it.
:)
I’ll be watching, for sure.
The minute Fred declares I’ll find out where to send $ and will help in any way I can. We need Fred.
This may be the first campaign I have worked for since Barry Goldwater, when I was a student at N.C.State. I hope he turns out to be another Ragan. If Hill or Hussein win Igotta find another country to live in. I can’t imagine what this country would be like with four years of rule by these bastards.
I saw somewhere else that FDT’s friends think there’s a ninety percent chance he’ll run.
Saw the debate excerpts, I was not that impressed with any of them. On other forums, moonbats are screeching about how bad FDT is, always a good sign you have a strong candidate there.
Maybe I will start the live thread now - just to beat everybody to the punch ;oP.
Love this - “What Would Fred Say?” WWFS!?
I might have to actually TiVo C-Span tonight. That would be a first.
You are a real piece of work, EternalVigilance. I saw you beating your chest yesterday about what a terrible candidate Romney is, and past comments about Thompson indicate that he does not meet your 100% Purity Level either. Your thinking represents much less than a majority of the voters in this country, and would not win a single state. You are the Republican version of Hubert Humphrey.
It seems clear to me that any candidate who has any chance of victory with the current electorate is not going to pass your holier than thou tests. Not only must the candidate be perfect now, but must demonstrate that he has been perfect for his entire documented life. You are ridiculous in your zealotry.
The fact that you revel in opposition research against these decent men show exactly what kind of person you are— the kind of all-or-nothing mentality that will only marginalize conservatism if you are allowed to dictate our nominee.
You have not said one good thing that I can see about a candidate in the race that is polling above 10%, or the one hopeful candidate that is the subject of this thread. The candidate the you favor (in your postings and on your home page) Alan Keyes is not going to be President—get over it.
Since your only purpose is to tear down the candidates, you are a detriment to our cause.
Fred is my last chance of going to the voting booth and NOT having to hold my nose.
The Dems can't stop him and they have to know that. Before the Gipper, they thought they had a lock on things but now they know otherwise.
Fred: Yes, who's calling?
Caller: Destiny!
You’ll take notice of all the “Fred Thompson, the Bible Thumping, Nazi Rascist” crap popping up all over the place, suddenly, in regard to one of his movie roles?
One of the other boards i visit already has a dozen or more postings on this in the last 2 hours.
I’m sure these idiots think Charlie Sheen should run for re-election, too...
Only if "your cause" is to elect a liberal. Good luck with that.
Your definition of “liberal” is just nuts.
Do you think Romney's extremely liberal record in Massachusetts is irrelevent?
I think you are irrelevant. You have no candidate, just anti-candidates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.