Posted on 05/02/2007 2:04:48 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
What would President Reagan do?
JACK KEMP - COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
May 2, 2007
As the Republican candidates all gather at the Reagan Library for their first debate of the presidential campaign, what follows is my advice on “what would Ronald Reagan do?” I'll start with the economy and follow later with foreign policy.
In giving thought to what Reagan would do about tax and budget policy, we must never forget the times in which he led our nation.
When he was first sworn in in 1981, Reagan faced a divided government, an economy in deep recession with rising prices and a rapidly falling dollar. The country had begun to experience what economists said was impossible, i.e. rising unemployment and accelerating inflation, which came to be called “stagflation.” The so-called “misery index” was at an all-time high, and the morale of the American people was at a record low, except for the Depression.
Conventional economists were calling for a tax increase to dampen inflation and for the Fed to use monetary policy to offset the fiscal drag to prevent a recession. Income tax rates were 70 percent at the top and 20 percent at the bottom.
Reagan moved decisively to cut tax rates by 25 percent across the board, and he supported Federal Reserve Board Chairman Paul Volker's tight monetary policy, thus strengthening the dollar while wringing inflation out of the economy. These bold steps, along with lowering the trade and regulatory barriers, helped the U.S. economy grow well over 4.5 percent while unemployment dropped below 5 percent for the first time in two decades.
As the economy grew, revenues increased, and the wealth of our nation began to produce the jobs that took unemployment from more than 6.5 percent down to 4.5 percent, all with price stability. This was something the Keynesian economists (and some conservatives, as well) said couldn't happen. Indeed it's happening now under President Bush, with unemployment at 4.4 percent, thanks in large part to the Bush tax-rate cuts.
Reagan would not only defend the Bush tax-rate cuts, he'd have more in store for us. He'd not only support making them permanent, but he'd offer up a tax-reform agenda that would cut the top tax rate to 20 percent, lower the payroll taxes on working families and allow workers to put at least half of their payroll taxes into IRAs so as to get a much better rate of return.
Reagan also believed in a zero capital gains tax on those who'd put their surplus capital at risk in enterprise zones, also known as empowerment zones. These special zones throughout urban and rural America would help to create more jobs for minorities and those living in poverty while creating access to capital and credit for low-income people.
He would tell us that it is absolutely possible to reduce the debt burden, fix Social Security and cut tax rates, all at the same time. Anyone who doesn't believe it doesn't comprehend the hypothesis put forth by President Kennedy in 1961 and '62 and confirmed by Reagan in the '80s: “The purpose of cutting taxes now is . . . to achieve a more prosperous and expanding economy. The soundest way to raise tax revenues in the long run is to cut the tax rates now.”
So, Republican candidates, here's a “Kempian” plan to memorize in the days and months ahead as you give a “Reaganesque” answer as to how to keep growing our American economy:
“My fellow Americans, I'm a spending hawk and a tax-cutter. We must adopt good economic policies – less spending, lower tax rates, a simpler tax code – and then let the economy work by unleashing the dynamics of the American worker, investor and entrepreneur. Someone will try to say that this won't reduce the deficit, and I challenge them on that. They don't know. They are still using computer models that have never worked in the past. You just can't predict the deficit with any precision.
“We're talking $2.4 trillion of taxes and more than $2.6 trillion in outlays in 2006, and the deficit is less than 2 percent of our GDP, which is more than $13 trillion. I respectfully disagree with anyone who thinks they can forecast precise estimates out into the future. It depends on economic growth.
“The economy will grow faster if we have open trade, a better tax code and restraint of spending. The growth of our economy is just not counted in the computer models, so we have to discount those models and use our best judgment about what's good for the country, the economy and the Free World. And that's exactly what I plan to do when I take office!”
why was he such a lousy VP candidate ? against Gore no less?
I just wish that the GOP candidates would really talk honestly about Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare. Fred Thompson has hinted at this so I’m keeping my fingers crossed.
The current group of G.O.P. hopefuls couldn’t carry Ronald Maximus’s jock.
President Reagan would have stopped spending like drunk sailors, put dissedent dems in their place, not allowed the notrh American “union” and he would not have a politicized war.
Ronald Reagan was an American first the rest number two type.
Not at all like the current leadership or group of wannabes.
A magnificent article.
Pity no one will ever read it.
ping
Glad you reprinted this from the S.D. Union Trib.
I take it you made it home no thanks to the Mexican marchers messing up traffic in downtown San Diego.
I missed them yesterday. There wasn’t any sign of any mechista marchers or boycotts anywhere that I could see.
In fact, I had Mexican food for lunch yesterday and the place was open. Traffic home was light though.
Memo to Jack: We already do have wide open borders with minimal to non-existent governmental barriers to imports. The enemies of this nation do not follow suit, and are slaughtering American manufacturing, and if the Commerce Dept. numbers for U.S. manufacturing took out housing, and the imported components they then mark up, it would be pretty manifest just how hollow America has become.
And it is not just on consumer items any more. We no longer make heavy duty transformers...which we would need by the hundred of thousands to be replaced in the event of a major EMP attack on the nation...one of the simplest and easiest things for an enemy to pull off.
We no longer make the infra red optics for our night vision equipment. Having outsourced it to China. (Illegally, btw).
China's steel manufacturers have exploded past the U.S...and now make 4 times more than ours do...even though their efficiency is less than half ours.
China is now poised to swallow up our automotive production as well. The domestic automotive industry was key to our being able to organize the huge reindustrialization efforts of WW-II which won the war for us. I doubt Toyota or Nissan, no matter how much they make here...will be able to do the same for us. Most all their engineers are in Japan...
Jack Kemp has always been weak on this. He never undestood industrial economics and reality. Only getting free trade "half-right." Which in this world of trade cheaters...is frankly ALL WRONG.
Kick ass. Break heads. Bomb cities. Take Nancy out to lunch. Invade Syria and Iran. Level whole countries who dare protest. Tea time with Nancy. Put guns to heads of all terrorist supporting nations. Get a shoe shine from Lybia's Khadaffy....
Easy. President Reagan would vote for Duncan Hunter.
That’s kind of funny, as the Debt/GDP ratio was far higher at the end of his term than it was at the start.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.