Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Audit shows TxDOT exaggerated the numbers – again
Land Line Magazine ^ | May 1, 2007 | David Tanner

Posted on 05/02/2007 10:48:56 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

he Texas state auditor has concluded that transportation officials used inflated numbers when they reported an $86 billion funding gap for highways and transportation projects.

The audit released April 30 has a familiar ring to it because it is the second scathing review of transportation funding estimates this year in the state.

State Auditor John Keel said the $86 billion estimate by Texas Department of Transportation officials should be more like $77.4 billion, but that’s not all. Nearly $38 billion of that estimate took into account undocumented cost estimates from city officials competing for shared transportation dollars.

Keel’s team of auditors concluded that while additional funding for transportation is needed, TxDOT’s formula “may not be reliable for making policy or funding decisions.”

Furthermore, the April audit showed that TxDOT’s estimated “tax gap” – insufficient revenues to pay for future projects – was calculated on a 30-year scale, while auditors point out that the typical life of a transportation project is 40 years. That led to an inflated estimate of the funding gap.

Keel’s team previously criticized TxDOT earlier this year on another aspect of transportation funding.

The State Auditor’s Office concluded in February that officials understated projected cost estimates for the 4,000-mile Trans-Texas Corridor of toll roads and other infrastructure.

Transportation officials had estimated in 2005 that the proposed corridor network would cost about $183 billion. Auditors determined that one segment – the TTC-35, comprising about 14 percent of the proposed network – would cost $105.6 billion alone.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: audit; business; cdas; cuespookymusic; dallas; dfw; economy; elpaso; environment; errors; fortworth; fundinggap; hb1892; highwayfunding; highways; jobs; johnkeel; legislature; loiskolkhorst; matherrors; metroplex; mistakes; moratorium; nocompete; noncompete; opposition; p3; ppp; privatefunding; privateinvestment; privatesector; privatization; rickperry; roads; sanantonio; sao; scandal; stateauditor; texas; texashouse; texassenate; tollroads; tolls; tollways; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; tx; txdot
Temporary toll ban nears passage in Texas; governor poised to veto

The Texas Senate overwhelmingly approved a bill Monday, April 30, that is intended to buy the state more time to review the effects of handing over roadways to private groups. It now heads back to the House for approval of changes.

Efforts to slow lease deals with private groups have been drawing consideration in both chambers for weeks. The Senate vote created a unified bill that Gov. Rick Perry is expected to veto.

The bill – HB1892 – would place a two-year moratorium on toll road leases with private groups. It also would require a study of the long-term effects of public-private partnerships.

The moratorium would exempt projects in Dallas-Fort Worth, San Antonio and El Paso. Advocates of the exemptions say the affected regions can’t afford a delay in relieving traffic congestion, The Dallas Morning News reported.

Regional authorities also would be given more say about local projects. Another provision in the bill would cap the length of leasing contracts at 40 years. Texas law now allows for contracts to run up to 70 years.

A formula also would be set up for the state to buy back roads and limit clauses that restrict new roads that compete with toll roads.

Rep. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, said the protections are needed because of concerns the state is giving away too much in toll road leases.

“There are enough questions out there to tap the breaks and take time to look before we leap into these 50-year contracts that we’re signing with private equity companies and tying up our ability to receive revenues off those roads,” Kolkhorst told “Land Line Now” on XM Satellite Radio.

“We need to make sure the Trans-Texas Corridor is viable. We need to look at the toll rates. We need to look at the noncompetes in there. We need to look at the buy back clauses. There are tons and tons of questions.”

House lawmakers are expected to take up the revised bill this week. If approved, the governor would have 10 days to decide whether to sign the bill, let it become law without his signature, or veto it. If he chooses to use his veto stamp, lawmakers would have some time before the scheduled May 28 adjournment for a veto-override vote.

The margins of support in both chambers have been more than enough to suggest the bill would be able to withstand a veto.

Perry’s office released a statement Friday, April 27, regarding the moratorium concept.

“I will review this bill carefully because we cannot have public policy in this state that shuts down road construction, kills jobs, harms air quality, prevents access to federal highway dollars, and creates an environment within local government that is ripe for political corruption.”

– By Keith Goble, state legislative editor

Staff Writer Reed Black contributed to this report.

1 posted on 05/02/2007 10:49:01 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 05/02/2007 10:49:47 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

All Perry’s fault....


3 posted on 05/02/2007 10:49:48 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (MY GOSH!! That's too CHEAP!!! :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


4 posted on 05/02/2007 10:52:00 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 100-Fold_Return

No, it’s not. It’s Bush’s fault. Everybody knows that.


5 posted on 05/02/2007 10:52:47 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

You’re welcome. :-)


6 posted on 05/02/2007 10:53:04 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BTTT


7 posted on 05/02/2007 10:55:07 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“Advocates of the exemptions say the affected regions can’t afford a delay in relieving traffic congestion, The Dallas Morning News reported.”

Did I read this correctly??? That the moratorium does NOT apply to San Antonio et al???


8 posted on 05/02/2007 10:56:06 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

bump.


9 posted on 05/02/2007 10:57:24 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

:> Yes, but Bush is goin’ away to chop down hackberry trees and mending barb-wahr fences...


10 posted on 05/02/2007 10:57:25 AM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (MY GOSH!! That's too CHEAP!!! :>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

At the very least, it does not apply to certain projects in San Antonio, El Paso, and DFW.


11 posted on 05/02/2007 10:58:32 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (G*d bless and heal Virginia Tech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I have felt from the outset that this would be rammed down our throats. I was right.


12 posted on 05/02/2007 10:59:41 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 100-Fold_Return
Something more than relieving traffic on major highways is happening. Perry is/was acting like this was a done deal, voters voting to delay/stop the project, and the feds threatening to withhold fed trans funds if it is not implemented. Someone really wants this project to be completed.
13 posted on 05/02/2007 11:08:59 AM PDT by WesternPacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
".....legislators saying that long-term private toll roads are bad, bad, bad, and really, really dangerous-except for that one in my district that would bring in a bunch of money
14 posted on 05/02/2007 11:40:28 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Gotta love the Statesman. Good read; thanks!


15 posted on 05/02/2007 11:48:24 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WesternPacific
".......some contend the plan allows area transportation agencies to bypass federal regulations for major road projects."
16 posted on 05/02/2007 11:49:15 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Perry is Bush and Rove’s DIC. (dumbass in charge)


17 posted on 05/02/2007 1:40:39 PM PDT by wolfcreek (DON'T MESS WITH A NATION IN NEED OF MEDICATION !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WesternPacific

“Someone really wants this project to be completed.”

CHINA and their Globalist buddies.


18 posted on 05/02/2007 1:45:32 PM PDT by wolfcreek (DON'T MESS WITH A NATION IN NEED OF MEDICATION !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Thanks for the ping!

You have FReepMail...

And we have a CDA/TTC moratorium!

19 posted on 05/02/2007 4:54:24 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

close counts in horseshoes and politics.


20 posted on 05/02/2007 9:04:22 PM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson