Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke Prosecutor Nifong Preps for His Own Trial
ABC News ^ | 5/1/07 | LARA SETRAKIAN

Posted on 05/01/2007 8:52:44 AM PDT by freespirited

The three Duke lacrosse players once charged with rape are off the hook. But the man who brought the case against them, Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong, faces a trial of his own in June.

The North Carolina Bar Association has charged Nifong with mishandling the Duke case, violating rules of ethical conduct by withholding evidence, lying to a judge and making inappropriate comments about the case to the press.

Even Nifong's friends expect the punishment to be severe -- anything from suspended his law license to permanent disbarment. Either way, Nifong would lose his seat as district attorney.

"Given the climate, the way the AG came out& I can't envision a scenario where he doesn't end up losing his license or having it suspended," said Bob Nauseef, a criminal defense lawyer in Durham.

Nauseef, who has been in touch with Nifong over the past week, says the district attorney is focused on preparing his defense. Even so, Nifong is mindful of the fact that he could soon be out of a job.

"There are wheels in motion for life after the DA's office, if not life after the law," Nauseef told ABC News.

"He's got some other things in the hopper. I've heard he's looking at teaching jobs. It wouldn't surprise me if he wrote a book."

"He'll be prepared to deal with any outcome that comes from the Bar," Nifong's lawyer David Freedman told ABC News. "That being said, he's a fighter."

Questions Raised Early Defense attorneys for the accused Duke players and other critics began questioning Nifong's actions after the Duke case first emerged in March 2006. By January 2006 the State Bar had charged Nifong with "conduct that involves dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation" and "conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice."

Months later, during an April 11 press conference marking an end to the Duke lacrosse case, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper called Nifong an overreaching "rogue prosecutor" who displayed "bravado" in a "rush to condemn."

Nauseef saw the attorney general's comments as overly harsh -- a move to curry political support and popularity.

"I agree that there were mistakes made, but I was pretty surprised by the strength of what they came out with," Nauseef said.

"It was pretty scathing. It's politics."

Should Nifong Resign? Many of Nifong's critics have called for him to step down as district attorney before his ethics trial. Beth Brewer, a Durham citizen and political rival of Nifong's, filed court documents asking Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson to remove Nifong from office.

Other district attorneys have distanced themselves from Nifong, pointing to his conduct as an example of what prosecutors should not do with a case.

"Mr. Nifong has not brought respect to our profession," said Josh Marquis, a prosecutor and ranking member of the National District Attorneys' Association. "Some of his actions have brought great disrepute on the profession of prosecution."

Nifong does have supporters, among them prosecutor Stormy Ellis. Ellis, who works for Nifong in the Durham district attorney's office, questions the critics.

"Everyone was on the bandwagon at first, criticizing the lacrosse team. Then the winds shifted and everyone's on the bandwagon to beat Mike [Nifong] up," she told ABC News.

"It makes me wonder how they've handled cases, how they've dealt with adversity in their own cases& it's all Monday morning quarterbacking."

In defending Nifong, Ellis also faulted his critics for ignoring his roughly 30 years of public service.

"He's a good man and one of the most honest people I know. People fail to look at the man who convicted numerous criminals, who dismissed numerous cases, who had an open-file policy before it was the law," she said.

"I'm shocked that he has been tainted as a 'rogue prosecutor.' It scares me to think that one case can mar you for the rest of your life."

For now Nifong has no intention of leaving office, his lawyer told ABC News. But if he is found guilty at the June 12 hearing Nifong could be left with no choice other than to leave his seat. The entire trial including the sentencing phase is expected to last four days.

Until then, Nifong can only wait as the drumbeat for his removal keeps pounding.

"He's definitely worried about what's going to happen," Nauseef told ABC News. "There's that feeling that he'll be made an example of."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dukelax; ncbar; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: freespirited
"I'm shocked that he has been tainted as a 'rogue prosecutor.' It scares me to think that one case can mar you for the rest of your life."

Not as shocked as the accused as to what one 'rogue prosecutor' could do to the rest of their lives.

21 posted on 05/01/2007 9:10:29 AM PDT by umgud ("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
If he loses the trial the civil lawsuits will bankrut him.

If OJ taught us anything, it's that winning criminal battles doesn't protect you from civil suits.
22 posted on 05/01/2007 9:12:31 AM PDT by faloi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: surrey

Anyone know who Wendy Murphy is? Big femo-nazi lawyer here in Boston. She thinks the parents of the players got to the accuser and the other dancer and paid them off. She’s still convinced they’re guilty and that some of the other players were witnesses and will eventually open up with the truth. She’s so hung up on this case. She thinks every accuser is telling the truth.

I heard her on the radio last weekend. I understood her to repeat the rumor that the accuser may have taken $2 million from some Duke alums. Wendy also claims he was initially approached to possibly represent the accuser’s interests but since she wouldn’t agree to be a party to any kind of payoff, she wasn’t hired.


23 posted on 05/01/2007 9:20:09 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: surrey
Anyone know who Wendy Murphy is? Big femo-nazi lawyer here in Boston. She thinks the parents of the players got to the accuser and the other dancer and paid them off. She’s still convinced they’re guilty and that some of the other players were witnesses and will eventually open up with the truth. She’s so hung up on this case. She thinks every accuser is telling the truth.

Wendy "women never lie about rape" Murphy is an embarrassment to the legal profession. KC Johnson has an excellent piece on Her Hissieness here:

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/12/wendy-murphy-file.html

24 posted on 05/01/2007 9:24:07 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Civil suits from the falsely accused should bankrupt and ruin Nifong.

If the courts allow them.

25 posted on 05/01/2007 9:31:26 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

What about that Sutton guy who put those Border Agents in jail?


26 posted on 05/01/2007 9:32:01 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

The job of DA has gigantic powers and vanishingly near zero accountability. If God were to try to design a magnet for psychopaths he could not do much better than that. Robert Hare’s “Without Conscience” is reputed to be the best general book on the nature of psychopaths and Hare, who worked for many years in the Canadian prison system, notes that the two best places to study psychopaths are prison systems and stock markets, but he obviously missed one; DA offices belong on that little list as well.


27 posted on 05/01/2007 9:37:36 AM PDT by jeddavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"He's got some other things in the hopper ... It wouldn't surprise me if he wrote a book made license plates ..."
28 posted on 05/01/2007 9:40:10 AM PDT by PackerBronco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

And rest assured that the Hunt / Easley machine with the Dem controlled legislature, as well as the courts, will only grant Nifong a mild slap on the wrist regardless of how badly he handled the case.


29 posted on 05/01/2007 9:41:57 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Nauseef saw the attorney general's comments as overly harsh -- a move to curry political support and popularity.

There's a certain irony to that...lol.

"I'm shocked that he has been tainted as a 'rogue prosecutor.' It scares me to think that one case can mar you for the rest of your life."

That's the funny thing about breaking trust. It's hard to know whether the event was actually an aberration or whether it's just the first time one was caught. In this case, my bet is on the latter.

30 posted on 05/01/2007 9:44:11 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"I'm shocked that he has been tainted as a 'rogue prosecutor.' It scares me to think that one case can mar you for the rest of your life." So you would let a murderer go free because he is well-respected? That's what this person is saying. I'm not Jewish, but I read an article once by a rabbi that said destroying a person's character is, in some ways, worse than just killing them. They have to live and suffer with what was done to them. I tend to agree, and think hanging is too good for Nifong, Mangum, and the police officers involved. Now Nifong has to live with it, and whatever he gets, it won't be undeserved.
31 posted on 05/01/2007 9:47:00 AM PDT by chesley ("Socialism" - The devil made them do it..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

what this fool does not know is he will be made an example of lieing,stealing and cheating in the guise of an officer of the court. He damaged all of that. He damaged Duke.
He damaged the rape shield law. He damaged Nancy Grace et al.

This fool will roast because he humiliated a liberal
not cheated law.


32 posted on 05/01/2007 9:48:08 AM PDT by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I heard someone say a few nights ago that in North Carolina, the District Attorney isn't required to have a valid law license.

There probably is no law requiring the Prosecuting attorney to be a licensed attorney. But that isn't the entire story. Only the Prosecuting attorney can bring cases to court. His assistants are his agents and have no more authority than he does. So practically speaking he must be licensed to be a prosecuting attorney.

33 posted on 05/01/2007 9:54:56 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
"I'm shocked that he has been tainted as a 'rogue prosecutor.' It scares me to think that one case can mar you for the rest of your life."

If this logic is to be valid, one must assume that a criminal gets a get out of jail free card on his first murder? It must also be noted that the false charges brought against these boys can include penalties as harsh a murder conviction.

Nifong should not get a "get out of jail free card."

34 posted on 05/01/2007 9:55:13 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
They’re right, and an example should be made of Nifong. The example is that if you are a selfish, egotistical, politically motivated, narcissistic prosecutor who ruins 3 boys lives for nothing but political motives, you will not only be disgraced, you will be sued till you’re selling pencils on a street corner. Jerk! No one should get away with ruining peoples lives for an agenda.
35 posted on 05/01/2007 9:56:20 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

The only book he writes should be from prison.

Yeah, make that a collection of love-letters to/from his new boyfriend/cellmate.


36 posted on 05/01/2007 9:57:40 AM PDT by MissEdie (Liberalscostlives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

He ought to be prepping for a date with Bubba.


37 posted on 05/01/2007 9:59:54 AM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

There is no law saying that a District Attorney must have a valid law license. The Assistant DAs under him/her must be licensed to practice in court.


38 posted on 05/01/2007 10:00:38 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jeddavis

The job of DA has gigantic powers and vanishingly near zero accountability. If God were to try to design a magnet for psychopaths he could not do much better than that. Robert Hare’s “Without Conscience” is reputed to be the best general book on the nature of psychopaths and Hare, who worked for many years in the Canadian prison system, notes that the two best places to study psychopaths are prison systems and stock markets, but he obviously missed one; DA offices belong on that little list as well.

Would George Soros be included in the stock market scene? Because I truly belive he is a psychopath! IMHO.


39 posted on 05/01/2007 10:01:33 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
[Nifong does have supporters, among them prosecutor Stormy Ellis. Ellis, who works for Nifong in the Durham district attorney’s office, questions the critics. “Everyone was on the bandwagon at first, criticizing the lacrosse team. Then the winds shifted and everyone’s on the bandwagon to beat Mike [Nifong] up,” she told ABC News.]

Stormy has a point about the media jumping on the bandwagon and then switching bandwagons when it became clear that they were on the wrong one. But the media is not “everyone” and there were many (especially around here on FR) who were right to be skeptical and not condemn the accused without evidence.

40 posted on 05/01/2007 10:02:03 AM PDT by spinestein (By the way, which one's 'Pink'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson