Do I smell a BARF ALERT, as I move on to the Continued... portion of the thread? It begins as though guns have legs arms and brains, imbued with an insatiable desire to go off when people are around. Time will tell as I move forward...
Instead of taking my gun away, take the crazy people away, away.
They used to put crazy people in asylums, in the old days. Now, we put crazy people Jerry Springer and the news when they do something stupid; and then cry they need to take my gun away. I am sic of these commie bastards.
Whoa, Dan Simpson actually wrote this:
“Now, how would one disarm the American population? First of all, federal or state laws would need to make it a crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The population would then be given three months to turn in their guns, without penalty.”
Gee, Dan, so what were you gonna do about all the criminals who are going to tell you to, um, reproduce with yourself?
Bump for Burge. This is not his usual but it’s very good.
It sounds like a perfectly logical solution to global warming to me. /sarc
I’ve been thinking about this gun thing, one argument we hear is that guns need to be kept out of the hands of the “rednecks” who would be prone to “blasting everything in sight” if they were in a VT type situation. You see this brought up in nearly every gun control argument. Like on this “progressive” site;
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/145666.html
Clicking through some of those comments we find this;
So if, when the shooter walked into that building...
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/145728.html
“...several students standing up inside a building letting fly with live ammo in all different directions is your idea of *safety*? That’s “doing something,” all right. Something stupid. How many massacres have CCWs affected, anyway?”
There you have it. Next, we find out the progressives, Jack and Silver are expert shots by clicking through this comment;
Make more laws like the gunshow loophole!
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/145798.html
and;
here in the land of “gun & knife” shows . . .
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/145962.html
Notice Silver’s reply to Ricardo B. Largo here;
Hey retard...
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/146029.html
“... but it wasn’t needed. My father was a small arms instructor, and I got my Marksman’s badge aged 14. I also beat a group of Police marksmen last time I guested at a gun club. I am a dead eye SoB, and I don’t need a lecture on the subject, thanks.
PS, I only mention my aptitude with firearms to dispense with the ‘hoplophobe’ label that gets thrown around. I am pro gun control, but certainly no ‘hoplophobe’, I enjoy shooting guns, but in a safe environment surrounded by skilled people. “
And here;
You’re a “dead eye” in the UK?
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/146195.html
“... I could shoot you dead with with a handgun at 100m, 60m if you were running away. With a rifle I could take whichever of your eyeballs I chose at 100m, and kill you easily at 600m.
Skeet shooting with a shotgun I average 6/10 except on the ‘Driven Game’ where my score drops to 4/10. This is because primarily I have shot rifles, and tend to lock my aim, which is detrimental in this case.
But perhaps you weren’t listening, my father was a small arms instructor in Her Majesties Armed Forces. I wasn’t taught by some hick, or 2nd rater, but my father who has survived live fire exchanges.
My experience has shown me just how deadly guns are, and at what range. Therefore, I think it sensible to have controls on them. I am even against the Police carrying guns routinely, but I certainly am not ignorant, nor scared of firearms.
You seem to infer that the lower rate of firerms ownership and use in the UK means that we have less skill in this area. Far from it! What it means is that people who do own firearms have passed safety tests, and are more skilled. Check out the per capita death rates in hunting accidents in the USA, and it’s comparable to our gun homicide rate! You rednecks kill as many people by accident as get killed in the UK by people aiming!”
Also Jack’s comment here;
“Me too.”
http://www.phlogredux.org/messages/146264.html
“We’ve both trotted this - out before, but Scott et al always discount it. I was in the gun club at Uni and I rated Marksman on rifles. I enjoyed guns and shooting. But that has nothing at all to do with my opinions on gun control. A decent person doesn’t think that his personal interests and pleasures should trump the wider issues of society. But then of course, a decent person isn’t a conservative. “
Now I’m suggesting cross-eyed rednecks are not the ones to be afraid of if they go nuts, the people who know how to shoot are. What happens when a expert shot like Silver or Jack goes nuts? The same thing that happened at VT, the guy was a good shot, not a cross-eyed redneck. Gun experts going nuts are the worst case senario, because they are experts. Yet the progressive leftists are afraid of cross-eyed rednecks who can’t hit what they are aiming at - how could you when in the throws of an orgasm from the gun you are holding?
.....continued....
I heard about a robbery this week where the two redneck thugs didn’t know how to open the folding knife they had and had to leave the scene of the crime in shame!
The trouble is no one knows when they or anyone else is at the point of mental breakdown. Some sort of mental breakdown is the common denominator in mass shootings.
Cross eyed rednecks will not do as much damage when/if they have a mental breakdown as an expert would.
So we end up back at the truth, “guns don’t kill people, people do”. Gun experts are far more dangerous than cross eyed rednecks, because they are experts. An smart expert will be able to find a gun anytime, anywhere, and if he reaches the point of a mental breakdown is the one who will do the most damage.
The solution appears to be a ban on learning how to shoot.
for later