Posted on 04/27/2007 9:22:47 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
Since the VT shootings in Blacksburg, Virginia, we have seen all manner of wild-eyed, anti-gunners come out of the woodwork to cynically use this crime as a chance to beat their gun grabbing drums. But, proposing that we send government Stormtroopers to smash down the doors of every home with a gun in it to confiscate their Constitutionally legal firearms is a step I haven't seen in a purportedly responsible newspaper. That is, until the Toledo Blade published a proposal for taking away our right to self-protection that included "Special squads of police" with unlimited powers to confiscate all guns. A hit squad that would traipse about the country invading homes at will and accosting peaceful citizens everywhere.
The author of this tyrannical proposal is Dan Simpson, who is described as "a retired Ambassador" and a "member of the editorial boards of The Blade and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. " He is a former US Ambassador to various African states... which can easily be read to mean one who thinks government knows best, darn the citizen's rights, apparently.
The piece that oozes from his pen seems overly long, the first half being an attempt by this anti-gun advocate to make it seem as if he really loves guns. After all, he played Cowboys and Indians as a kid and also had a Red Ryder BB gun. Then, later in life, carried a .357 as a "diplomat". But after the hard to believe disclaimers are dispensed with, Simpson launches into his gun banning proposal.
Now, how would one disarm the American population? First of all, federal or state laws would need to make it a crime punishable by a $1,000 fine and one year in prison per weapon to possess a firearm. The population would then be given three months to turn in their guns, without penalty.There is a major problem legally with this supposed diplomat's plans. He never once mentions that the 2nd Amendment is a Constitutional right of the people to keep and bear arms. His proposal is completely illegal according to the Constitution of the USA unless a Constitutional Convention is called to consider amending the law of the land. One would think that an "Ambassador" would be interested in little things like following the law... but apparently not Mr. Simpson.
Worse, and as mentioned, he wants to form a veritable Stormtrooper army that will maraud throughout the country.
The disarmament process would begin after the initial three-month amnesty. Special squads of police would be formed and trained to carry out the work. Then, on a random basis to permit no advance warning, city blocks and stretches of suburban and rural areas would be cordoned off and searches carried out in every business, dwelling, and empty building. All firearms would be seized. The owners of weapons found in the searches would be prosecuted: $1,000 and one year in prison for each firearm.Perhaps Mr. Simpson became too used to the despotic, all powerful leaders in the failed African states to which he was sent as Ambassador and their style of autocratic government made him envious. But whatever the case, Simpson truly has no grasp of the country in which he lives because he doesn't mention any of it. No mention of the Constitution, our history, world history and the despots who ruled with an iron fist over an unarmed populace, or the principles upon which this country was founded make even a tiny appearance in his piece. Just his desire to hand all power to his hand picked goon squad who will roam about the country attacking law abiding citizens.
... On the streets it would be a question of stop-and-search of anyone, even grandma with her walker, with the same penalties for "carrying."
The hit squad Simpson envisions isn't his only anti-gun measure, of course.
He proposes gun dealers still be "allowed" to sell guns but only to museums. He thinks hunters should still be allowed their gun but he has created his own ideas of a classified "hunting weapon" that will have to be locked up with the police except during "hunting season" -- a vague notion in Simpson's mind obviously. After all, "hunting seasons" are different all over the place and allow for hunting different types of game all year long. Obviously Simpson has no clue of what "hunting season" really means. His idea would necessitate a Federal Hunting law, and would take more power from the various states.
Speaking of hunters, Simpson appears to imagine that all hunters are mass murderers just waiting for their chance to kill all around them, too. But, that their murdering rampages might be a "lesser sort of issue."
There could conceivably also be a rash of score-settling during hunting season as people drew out their weapons, ostensibly to shoot squirrels and deer, and began eliminating various of their perceived two-footed enemies. Given the general nature of hunting weapons and the fact that such killings are frequently time-sensitive, that seems a lesser sort of issue.Simpson also seems to imagine that Mexico and Canada would rush into the gun selling business once we illegally outlaw them and send our Stormtrooping armies throughout the country to confiscate US citizen's firearms.
America's long land and sea borders present another kind of problem. It is easy to imagine mega-gun dealerships installing themselves in Mexico, and perhaps in more remote parts of the Canadian border area, to funnel guns into the United States. That would constitute a problem for American immigration authorities and the U.S. Coast Guard, but not an insurmountable one over time.Yet, both Mexico and Canada have stricter gun laws than do we, so how he imagines that they would suddenly both become the virtual WalMart of guns is hard to imagine.
All in all, Simpson has done nothing but reveal that he thinks he is smarter than everyone around him and that only HE should be allowed to make all the rules. He also imagines himself smarter than the Founders as well as more able than the Supreme Court to adjudicate what should be allowable under the US Constitution.
It is no wonder that this man doesn't understand America, he seems quite unlike one.
What this lowlife Toledo Blade writer wants might be in our best interests - in the longrun. For nothing would start a civil war as surely as repealing the 2nd amendment. It would give patriotic Americans a legitimate chance to route the leftist scum that has invaded our body politic. Our military is sworn to uphold the constitution and this would be a clear violation.
What’s that old saying....Be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.
Mr. Simpleton would need a weapon himself, because I believe a number of people would see him as the root of their problem, and would track him down.
Another elitist puke government bow wow. Did he ever figure out which end of the .357 to point ?
Based on the Australian and British experience, it's scary to contemplate just how many would probably cooperate with the amnesty.
In general, the rural midwest, South, and Intermountain West, would not be a friendly place to the gun grabbers.
Might not be that far a stretch; after all, it was less than 15 years from the time Ralph threatened to send Alice “To the moon!” until Neil Armstrong intoned those fateful and flummoxed words, “One small step for man...”
Even if 90% complied, the remaining 10% of "outlaws" would outnumber the "Special Squads" nearly 10-to-1.
The following is from a very good article about the VT massacre, and the responsibility of gun control and gun controllers (i.e. tyrants) for it.
“Come get them. You can have the bullets first, then if you are still above room temperature you are welcome to pry them out of my cold and stiff fingers. Think for a minute though, dumbass, that I and people like me might be a lot better at this violence thing than you sissies.”
http://gonzosbarandgogogrill.mensnewsdaily.com/2007/04/16/33-dead-at-virginia-tech/
Dan Simpson strikes me as one of the sissies - who wants to have the power to use others to do that which he is unable/unwilling to do for himself.
To quote King Leonidas I of Sparta, responding to the demand of the Persians that he and his men “Lay down your weapons!”: “MOLON LABE!!!” Come and get them!
See the film clip at:
http://www.teentoday.co.uk/films/300trailer.shtml
300 Spartans killed 20,000 Persians to defend their liberties. Just what does Simpson think that 80 million American gun owners would do?
“Frightening to think that moonbats such as him have votes that cancel out the votes of real Americans.”
All the more reason to NEVER waste ones vote on “teaching a lesson”.
His “special squads” should start by kicking in the door at the Toledo Blade in search of his useless butt!
Hooray for the First Amendment!
Allowing mental defectives to publicly expose themselves since 1791.
Entering a domicile would be the perfect opportunity to also seize hate literature (i.e. The Bible).
With extreme prejudice.
I wonder if they want to take my Claymore’s too?!!
SS stood for Schutzstaffel, which usually translates as "protective squad," which makes sense because they started at Hitler's bodyguards. "Gestapo" was a contraction of "Geheime Staatspolize"--Secret State Police. Then there were the Sonderkommando, which translates as "Special Squads"--they were the Jews in the camps forced to aid in the extermination (for a few weeks or months, before being killed themselves because they knew too much). Finally, there were the Einsatzgruppen, which translates to "task force" or "intervention group:. They were the ones travelling the countryside in eastern Europe and the Soviet Union killing "undesirables" without the formality of shipping them to death camps.
A Clinton Appointee calling for massive gun confiscation...
Why am I NOT surprised?
Hitler and Geobbell’s thought it was a great idea, too....
Nazism disguised as Liberalism is knocking at the door, is anyone paying attention?
They would have to be very special squads indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.