Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stark Introduces a Carbon Tax to Combat Climate Change
California Chronicle ^ | April 26, 2007 | --

Posted on 04/27/2007 5:02:32 AM PDT by johnny7

Save Our Climate Act would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. Representative Pete Stark (D-CA), a senior member of the Committee on Ways and Means with jurisdiction over U.S. tax policy, today introduced the Save Our Climate Act. This legislation would impose a tax on carbon-based fossil fuels to slow climate change.

“The question is not if human activity is responsible for global climate change, but how the United States will respond,” said Stark. “Predictable, transparent and universal, a carbon tax is a simple solution to a difficult problem. It would drastically reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by providing an economic disincentive for the use of carbon-based fossil fuels and an incentive for the development and use of cleaner alternative energies. The Save Our Climate Act would establish the United States as a global leader in environmental protection and encourage other nations – most of whom have already acknowledged the climate change threat – to take similar action to reduce emissions. I strongly encourage Congress to pass a carbon tax.”

An initial tax of $10 per ton of carbon content will be assessed on coal, petroleum and natural gas when these fossil fuels are initially removed from the ground or imported into the United States. The tax will increase by $10 each year, freezing when a mandated report by the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Energy determines that carbon dioxide emissions have decreased by 80 percent from 1990 levels.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: carbontax; climatechange; climategrifters; globalwarming; junkscience; petestark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
It's heeeere...
1 posted on 04/27/2007 5:02:33 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Their answer to everything real and unreal. Tax it!


2 posted on 04/27/2007 5:08:03 AM PDT by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I’ve been waiting for it although I thought it would come from the UN and not the US.


3 posted on 04/27/2007 5:08:27 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (Anti Islam and a Global Warming denier - piss on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Is this guy just plain nuts or does he really want to destroy the economy?I can reduce my carbon foot print by not driving to work anymore,but income tax will be drastically reduced.


4 posted on 04/27/2007 5:08:51 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Does his proposal address what would happen if we can’t make the 80% reduction from 1990 levels because the China levels are so high they impact us? Oh, that’s right, we don’t want to offend China by asking them to do anything to “save the planet”...
5 posted on 04/27/2007 5:11:18 AM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Elections have consequences...


6 posted on 04/27/2007 5:11:55 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
Is this guy just plain nuts....

yup, he's a moonbat alright


7 posted on 04/27/2007 5:13:49 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnny7; All
Posted on 3/24/07. I knew it was coming, I just named the wrong politician

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1806124/posts

8 posted on 04/27/2007 5:16:46 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1806124/posts


9 posted on 04/27/2007 5:17:42 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
“The question is not if human activity is responsible for global climate change, but how the United States will respond,” said Stark. “Predictable, transparent and universal, a carbon tax is a simple solution to a difficult problem. It would drastically reduce our carbon dioxide emissions by providing an economic disincentive for the use of carbon-based fossil fuels and an incentive for the development and use of cleaner alternative energies. The Save Our Climate Act would establish the United States as a global leader in environmental protection and encourage other nations – most of whom have already acknowledged the climate change threat – to take similar action to reduce emissions. I strongly encourage Congress to pass a carbon tax.”

Is this moron yet another example of having lawyers lead science policy? The Sun is the source of the climate change, and has been for the past 400,000 years. Taking action to reduce global warming is nonsense. Taking action to adapt to inevitable climate change makes sense. Climate change has been going on for millions of years. If Mars and other planets in our solar system are experiencing global warming, so is the Earth. The Earth has experienced and will continue to experience climate change. Of course, in the study of the origins of religion, pagans started with worship of the Sun, the Earth, and other objects. The pagans are back! Of course if you want to believe that global warming on Mars and the Earth is caused by SUVs, be my guest. Consider joining the Democratic Party, ACLU, and other leftist, socialist organizations where mental disorders are the norm.

10 posted on 04/27/2007 5:19:13 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

So where does the proceeds from the tax go? The article left that part out....


11 posted on 04/27/2007 5:20:57 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
I knew it was coming...

Sheeeit... I knew it was coming over a year ago.

12 posted on 04/27/2007 5:21:01 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Well, this voter didn’t pack up my toys and most certainly didn’t stay home last election. We can’t do this by ourselves unfortunately!


13 posted on 04/27/2007 5:21:49 AM PDT by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
“The question is not if human activity is responsible for global climate change..."

"The debate is over." We will here this constantly. The leftists will be very forceful with this statement...the Republicans will not fight it. Welcome to the new series of tax increases.

14 posted on 04/27/2007 5:22:02 AM PDT by gate2wire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Congress should solve their own carbon problem by cessation of all respiratory activity immediately.


15 posted on 04/27/2007 5:22:38 AM PDT by sono (TITUS PVLLO in MMVIII - Paid for by the Aventine Collegium for Pullo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Is that $10. per year for a household, a vehicle, a person, a business? What?


16 posted on 04/27/2007 5:23:33 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The tax will increase by $10 each year, freezing when a mandated report by the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Energy determines that carbon dioxide emissions have decreased by 80 percent from 1990 levels.

Can someone explain to me how the IRS determines carbon levels?


17 posted on 04/27/2007 5:24:02 AM PDT by Paisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

My guess—$10 per ton of carbon content upon retrival. The company extracting the product from the ground will pay the tax and pass it on to the consumer.


18 posted on 04/27/2007 5:28:10 AM PDT by gate2wire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
The question is not if human activity is responsible for global climate change, but how the United States will respond can we use it as an excuse to increase taxes?

Fixed it.

19 posted on 04/27/2007 5:28:38 AM PDT by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Enact this carbon tax and watch the 13,000 Dow average plummet.


20 posted on 04/27/2007 5:29:37 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson