[SJackson]

I don't know about cursing and insulting Jim. or Daring and begging to be banned.. Banning for personal attacks, that's laughable. Personal attacks are made all the time, any bannings on that basis are highly selective. I can call you a traitor, or disloyal or gay or an abortionist or post ugly religious slurs all day long without reprecussions as I'm on the "right" side of the "issue".

We're back to support for Rudy.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

You must not of read Al Simmons opus then.

Also, read post #323.

[azhenfud]

Well, some capsized their own ship and begged for a shot in the keel to sink them.

Jim graciously obliged.

[airborne]

I don't know about cursing and insulting Jim. or Daring and begging to be banned.

I'm just relating what I saw. Feel free to check with others who were here.

Banning for personal attacks, that's laughable. Personal attacks are made all the time...

It is subjective, banning, but in many cases the poster was warned to stop and chose not to.

IMHO, Jim was not in the mood to tolerate a whole lot of belligerence, and it was easy to see in his posts.

I may be wrong about this, but it seemed to me that there were some who recognized that Jim had a zero tolerance attitude and purposely goaded him with the intention of getting banned.

We're back to support for Rudy.

Be that as it may, it does all eventually come back to Rudy. But not "just because someone supported him", but because they pleasured in throwing it in Jim's face.

That's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

[Jim Robinson]

I posted the following statement to our front page in response to the criticism I’m receiving lately as to not being fair and balanced and perceived mistreatment of trolls and assorted malcontents. Got news for all, I’m NOT fair and balanced. I’m biased toward God, country, family, liberty and freedom and against liberalism, socialism, anarchism, wackoism, global balonyism and any other form of tyranny. Hope this helps.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts