[Jim Robinson]

I posted the following statement to our front page in response to the criticism I’m receiving lately as to not being fair and balanced and perceived mistreatment of trolls and assorted malcontents. Got news for all, I’m NOT fair and balanced. I’m biased toward God, country, family, liberty and freedom and against liberalism, socialism, anarchism, wackoism, global balonyism and any other form of tyranny. Hope this helps.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts

[SJackson]

I've never accused you of being fair and balanced, nor have I questioned your right to make these judgements.

I do disagree, and admit my bias' would include a Republican in the White House in 2008, I sincerely hope not one with so many vowels in his last name. Clearly we disagree about how to accomplish that.

[SJackson]

BTW, does this end the arguement about whether or not the bannings are related to support for a candidate which fits your bias'. Or do we have to continue dancing around the "they said something insulting to someone" or "they posted from a bad site" or "they distorted a quote".

I think it's the candidate, which is your perrogative. You don't need my permission or support, but clarity is helpful.

[Kevmo]

Hi Jim:

You said you posted it in response to criticism you’re receiving “lately” but it’s dated 2004... Is there an updated thread?

[vox_freedom]

Got news for all, I’m NOT fair and balanced. I’m biased toward God, country, family, liberty and freedom and against liberalism, socialism, anarchism, wackoism, global balonyism and any other form of tyranny. Hope this helps.

And there are plenty of us who subscribe to, like, enjoy and appreciate those biases.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Well, the certainly pre-dates all the Rudy stuff, doesn’t it.