Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Officer Accuses Generals of 'Intellectual and Moral Failures'
Washington Post ^ | April 27, 2007 | Thomas E. Ricks

Posted on 04/27/2007 1:24:55 AM PDT by Cardhu

An active-duty Army officer is publishing a blistering attack on U.S. generals, saying they have botched the war in Iraq and misled Congress about the situation there.

"America's generals have repeated the mistakes of Vietnam in Iraq," charges Lt. Col. Paul Yingling, an Iraq veteran who is deputy commander of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment. "The intellectual and moral failures . . . constitute a crisis in American generals."

Yingling's comments are especially striking because his unit's performance in securing the northwestern Iraqi city of Tall Afar was cited by President Bush in a March 2006 speech and provided the model for the new security plan underway in Baghdad.

He also holds a high profile for a lieutenant colonel: He attended the Army's elite School for Advanced Military Studies and has written for one of the Army's top professional journals, Military Review.

The article, "General Failure," is to be published today in Armed Forces Journal and is posted at http://www.armedforcesjournal.com. Its appearance signals the public emergence of a split inside the military between younger, mid-career officers and the top brass.

Many majors and lieutenant colonels have privately expressed anger and frustration with the performance of Gen. Tommy R. Franks, Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno and other top commanders in the war, calling them slow to grasp the realities of the war and overly optimistic in their assessments.

Some younger officers have stated privately that more generals should have been taken to task for their handling of the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison, news of which broke in 2004. The young officers also note that the Army's elaborate "lessons learned" process does not criticize generals and that no generals in Iraq have been replaced for poor...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: competence; generals; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: Strategerist

“Patton (who who because he had a good movie made about him and people don’t actually read a lot of military history, is a TAD overrated on FR)...”

Overrated? Patton’s 3rd Army out performed every other European Theater army in WWII. His approach to combat is sorely needed today - “Audacity, audacity, always audacity.”

I believe the officer in question in this thread is saying that unlike Patton, today’s flag rank generals are not willing to take calculated risks necessary to adapt to the skills, tactics, and strategies of the enemy. After this much time in Iraq we know that our soldiers have the heart and the desire to do what is necessary, the senior leadersip needs to catch up and help them get the job done.


41 posted on 04/27/2007 4:04:39 AM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
No wonder the will is weak if the only role models are a Nazi and a yellow journalist. That all goes back to the mindset that propaganda is bad, and only bad guys use it, which hamstrings strategic communication.
42 posted on 04/27/2007 4:06:21 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group -- Distributed IO and counter-propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
However, a survey of Army three- and four-star generals shows that only 25 percent hold advanced degrees from civilian institutions in the social sciences or humanities

And an astonishingly low 0.002% hold advanced degrees in Ballet and Interpretative dance. I think we can live with that.

43 posted on 04/27/2007 4:08:43 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

No. He’ll be protected. This has been long in coming. Too much conventional thinking went into the Iraq Occupation, not enough McMaster and Petraueus.

Perhaps Rumsfeld did not remove enough Colonel Blimps, but rather, enabled them.

Be Seeing You,

Chris


44 posted on 04/27/2007 4:10:03 AM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Propaganda per se is neither good nor bad - no more than breathing or crapping. And to an extent it is a science [applied mass psychology] or a skill, the successful practitioners become not the role models but instructors.


45 posted on 04/27/2007 4:11:32 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
One major factor against motivational efforts is the rampant PC and anti-Patriotism that is so prevalent in the US, and most Western societies.

Every attempt at Patriotism is met with labels of "Nationalism" and equations of this to 'National Socialism - read Nazism.'

This is sad excuse of 'moral relevancy' is engrained in the media reports and at every level of discussion. The academics have worked overtime to instill this deviation from reality.

46 posted on 04/27/2007 4:14:01 AM PDT by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4

The article, “General Failure,” is to be published today in Armed Forces Journal and is posted at http://www.armedforcesjournal.com. Its appearance signals the public emergence of a split inside the military between younger, mid-career officers and the top brass.

Surge strategist Frederick Kagan on how events are unfolding in Iraq.
Hugh Hewitt show ^ | 4/25/07 | Frederick Kagan / Hugh Hewitt
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1823696/posts

(snip)

HH: Can you give us a little circumstances on how you got there? Did you guys ask General Petraeus? Or did he invite a bunch of you to come as one of the architects of the surge? I was fascinated that you would go over.

FK: No, we…I asked to come visit and see what’s going on, try to get an understanding of the situation on the ground, and help me to form my evaluation of how things are going, and where we need to head.

HH: And where did it take you? What did you see?

FK: We went, I went into Baghdad, went into joint security, two joint security stations in the Hurriya area of the Khadimiya neighborhood, went up to Baqubah, to the FOB out there, and then rode in strikers to the joint commander center, listened to the Iraqi division commander out there brief, got up to see our bases at Taji and Balad, and had the opportunity to meet with some former cadets that I’d taught who were also over there, and get their impressions from the lower levels.

HH: Now if you can give us the summary before I get to the specifics, has there in the 100 days since President Bush announced the plan, which is not yet even fully staffed, or even half staffed with the five brigades, et cetera, is there a change in the wind?

FK: There sure is. There are a lot of changes underway. One of the most remarkable things is that sectarian violence in Baghdad dropped almost immediately after the President announced the surge, and has stayed down. And in fact, the command in Iraq has recently announced that the daily murder rate in Baghdad is the lowest it’s been in six months, and it’s down 65% since November. And that’s a really dramatic accomplishment this early into the surge. Probably even more important than that, and this is something that goes back even before the surge, is that the Sunni population in Iraq is really beginning to turn on al Qaeda, and Anbar, which had been their base and stronghold, it’s becoming inhospitable to them, and the Sunnis are joining the police forces and the army, and are starting to attack and kill the terrorists. And that’s an incredibly important development.
(snip)


47 posted on 04/27/2007 4:21:24 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

There is no fact I am aware of that says Abu Ghraib was more than abuse by a very small section of enlisted folks at the prison. Like it or not, that actually does happen.

Present facts that show the complicity of generals in that foolishness in which no one was injured, and someone might be inclined to pursue any generals.

We don’t just convict people on the basis of emotion.


48 posted on 04/27/2007 4:27:44 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL
Overrated? Patton’s 3rd Army out performed every other European Theater army in WWII. His approach to combat is sorely needed today - “Audacity, audacity, always audacity.”

It's impossible to claim someone is overratedm without people misinterpreting that into you saying they're terrible.

There's an element on FR that seem to blindly worship Patton as an infallible military genius who was the greatest general of all time, seemingly, because their only knowledge of either Patton, or military history in general, is the film.

49 posted on 04/27/2007 4:33:20 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I’m hoping to one day see his neck in a noose.

LLS


50 posted on 04/27/2007 4:39:20 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

40 years of enemy IO preparation of the battlefield through cultural Marxism is the primary reason our side does strategic communications so poorly. Tens of millions of our fellow citizens are hard-wired to disbelieve.


51 posted on 04/27/2007 4:49:24 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group -- Distributed IO and counter-propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

He’s not going to be getting any “Stars” now. I suspect he is headed for a quiet retirement and after that, I smell a book deal.


52 posted on 04/27/2007 4:52:25 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“The views of subordinates and peers play no role in an officer’s advancement; to move up he must only please his superiors.”

It’s the Army. The military has always had a command and control structure. Command and control applied to society is socialism/fascism/communism. While it is wrong for society, it seems to be right for the military. In some ways, this sounds like a familiar complaint.

Even outside the military, there often comes a time when one gripes about the boss, or “management,” or about ‘those in control,” etc. Only a few are rewarded for doing so. He may get his 15 minutes of fame. Then in a new administration, who knows?


53 posted on 04/27/2007 4:55:19 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Reagan defeated the Soviet Union despite the Democratic party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

I disagree here. The general in charge of Abu Ghraib prison was removed and forced to retire. Higher up the chain than that it gets murky real fast. Figuring out that a rogue unit is operating inside a prison would be almost impossible for someone higher than the prison commander to determine unless there was a whistleblower.


54 posted on 04/27/2007 4:56:25 AM PDT by rbg81 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Career killer bump!


55 posted on 04/27/2007 5:02:30 AM PDT by Don Carlos (MSgt, USAF (Ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Obviously anyone who doesn’t wave pom poms around blindly and clap their hands together like a trained seal in an anti American surrender monkey. Tell these nay sayers to throw a “I support the troops” magnet on their car, and get back in line behind the military geniuses who knows what they are doing /sarc

calling them slow to grasp the realities of the war and overly optimistic in their assessments.

I know what he means.

We are still only left with the task of getting the Iraq security Forces trained so they can handle the security. There's nothing else we are prepared to do at this point. At the end of the day, we need the area secure.

On a side note, what's going on in Congress isn't helping.

56 posted on 04/27/2007 5:03:17 AM PDT by corlorde (New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

8 Star General John Murtha will probably have a slot open for him.


57 posted on 04/27/2007 5:08:38 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

“Surely he’s asking for court martial”

Yep. He knows his comments undermine our efforts and he needs to be punished. I hope it was worth it.


58 posted on 04/27/2007 5:09:14 AM PDT by RDTF (R.I.P. Blue Angel LCDR Kevin Davis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
The Generals had plenty of opportunity to brief congressional committees, and hence you and I, on the realities.

Rumsfeld set the tone early for what happened to those in uniform who talked out of school. I believe it was just prior to 9-11 when General Kernan (Joint Forces Command) and a Navy flag officer told some House committee that ground forces were too small. Within a day or two, during one of the Rumsfeld/Meyers Pentagon briefs, they were publicly dressed down for what they had said to the committee. A short time later Kernan retired. That, and the way Shinseki was treated by Rumsfelt, left no doubt about how to stay in line.

59 posted on 04/27/2007 5:20:54 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
His career will be shortened I do believe.

I doubt it. He didn't shoot his mouth off to a reporter. He published his criticism in a US Army publication -- this is essentially "official criticism".

He'll get his own stars one day. You don't get to be the XO of an ACR without being well regarded.

60 posted on 04/27/2007 5:29:13 AM PDT by Tallguy (John Corzine: NJ Governor or Crash Test Dummy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson